• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Contact sheets: MCP 312 without filter.

Manners street Lads

A
Manners street Lads

  • 0
  • 0
  • 13
Arkansas Ent

A
Arkansas Ent

  • 3
  • 2
  • 41

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
203,047
Messages
2,849,117
Members
101,621
Latest member
Victor1
Recent bookmarks
0

baachitraka

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
3,651
Location
Bremen, Germany.
Format
Multi Format
I have made contact sheets of 35mm negs with base exposure of 20.2 seconds @f/11 without Filter.

Paper: MCP 312 semi-matte

Developer: Adotol NE - 1 min.

Enlarger: Focomat Ic.

Film: APX 100 and Fomapan 100 developed with Rodinal 1+50.

Contact sheets gave an overall idea about the print exposures and as well as neg exposures(APX is lossy compared to Fomapan).

Now I am curious about the effect of filters(atleast Grade 3) before I burn some more paper.

One thing for sure is it will affect the contrast but I wonder whether it will effect the base exposure too...if so, how much? Provided the height, the lens opening and other variables are kept constant.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
> effect of filters(atleast Grade 3).

Usually you wish the contact sheets to bee flat - to see what is in the negative.
 
No reason ever to expose multigrade paper without any filter. Contact sheets always show less information than contained in the negatives. I find their utility questionable.
 
We all do it differently. I find soft grade contacts pointless, because they tell everything and nothing. I prefer to do it as Barry Thornton suggested in his article: Dead Link Removed
 
From the article, I understood as follows

* Make test strips of film base + fog and find the minimum time for maximum black. For 35mm with Grade 3 filter.
* Make contact sheet with minimum time.
* Shadows will tell how much correction is required in the exposure.
* Highlights will teach about the development times.

** I conclude that overexposed and under developed will print with good tonal seperation.

Do I miss anything...
 
Do I miss anything...

No, I don't think you did miss anything. I came to the same conclusions as you. The only issue I can see is that contacts of 135 negs are so small that you might need a magnifying glass/loupe to check if shadows and highlights are as they should be. 1x1.5 inches isn't much of an area for a good examination.

pentaxuser
 
I try to print that at-least impresses my wife. Everytime I show her something and she goes like 'Well, you can take to a lab for printing...in indian accent'

:-(
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom