Contact Printing - A Revelation

Cafe Art

A
Cafe Art

  • 7
  • 3
  • 109
Sciuridae

A
Sciuridae

  • 5
  • 2
  • 137
Takatoriyama

D
Takatoriyama

  • 6
  • 3
  • 144
Tree and reflection

H
Tree and reflection

  • 2
  • 0
  • 115

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,643
Messages
2,762,355
Members
99,426
Latest member
subtlelikeatrex
Recent bookmarks
1

Alex Hawley

Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2003
Messages
2,892
Location
Kansas, USA
Format
Large Format
John McCallum said:
Ahuh - so you guys don't miss enlarging / or having large prints then? (assuming you don't have monster enlarger :smile:.

John, I still do some enlarging because I have a few prints from smaller formats that I still like. But, going back to the enlarger after contact printing makes me appreciate how easy and pleasurable contact printing is.

My mistake was going to 4x5 before 8x10. That little excursion caused be to get a LF enlarger and produce a few 4x5 negs that are some of my best. If I had it to do over again, I would just jump right in to 8x10. I also found that the 8x10 is easier to work with than any other camera I've used. Sure, it weighs more and takes up more room, but I don't have to squint down to see the image. I can look at it with both eyes open and at a more natural viewing distance.
 

John McCallum

Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2004
Messages
2,407
Location
New Zealand
Format
Multi Format
Alex you make a very interesting case.

Argghhhh - wife's going to kill me!!! Mind you, bought her a really nice pair of shoes for her birthday yesterday. :rolleyes: ... and we *are* going to get the Flaming Chicken at the Thai Classic on Sat night!!!!

Yup fair trade! I will start thinking about it seriously.

John.

boy somone can get in trouble hanging 'round this place....
 

Alex Hawley

Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2003
Messages
2,892
Location
Kansas, USA
Format
Large Format
John McCallum said:
Alex you make a very interesting case.

Just to prod you a little more John, 8x10 is not much more expensive than 4x5. Film and film holders cost more, Azo paper costs more per box, but one needs fewer sheets of paper to get a good print than with enlarging paper. As an example, just yesterday, I blew probably 10 sheets trying to get the print I wanted on an enlargement. With Azo, its never been more than five sheets, typically only three or four.

Second prod: another big benefit of the 8x10, IMO, is that the effects of the view camera movements are much easier to see than with 4x5.

Good luck with the Better Half!
 

John McCallum

Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2004
Messages
2,407
Location
New Zealand
Format
Multi Format
Alex Hawley said:
.....
Second prod: another big benefit of the 8x10, IMO, is that the effects of the view camera movements are much easier to see than with 4x5.

Good luck with the Better Half!
Really!? You mean selective focusing and that sort of thing?

John.

Argh stop it! stop it!
 
OP
OP

Francesco

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2003
Messages
1,016
Location
Düsseldorf,
Format
8x10 Format
Jorge said:
I dont miss enlarging at all, and after my tests with JandC 400 I think I will be packing my enlarger for good.

What, you still have enlarging equipment? Surely they are covered in dust by now.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom