Condenser vs Diffusion

Branches

A
Branches

  • 5
  • 0
  • 50
St. Clair Beach Solitude

D
St. Clair Beach Solitude

  • 10
  • 3
  • 151
Reach for the sky

H
Reach for the sky

  • 4
  • 4
  • 187
Agawa Canyon

A
Agawa Canyon

  • 4
  • 3
  • 228

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,892
Messages
2,782,655
Members
99,742
Latest member
lekhaiya
Recent bookmarks
0

Donald Miller

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2002
Messages
6,230
Format
Large Format
If you want maximum grain, accutance, and resolution forget about diffusion enlargers. The nearer that you get to a point light source the more you will notice the increase of each of these. I speak from my own personal experience having used everything from a cold light head to a point light source condenser enlarger.
 

eclarke

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
1,950
Location
New Berlin,
Format
ULarge Format
I think you need to have a vision for the final print and use the tool you have to accomplish the objective. The great printers of the past just used what they had available to make their great prints...EC
 

vet173

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2005
Messages
1,209
Location
Seattle
Format
8x10 Format
A condencer will lend itself to getting the seperation in the bottem easier, a diffusion will lend itself to getting better seperation in the highs. I have both. I prefer the diffused colorhead for the ease of use and my negs are keyed to it. Standard developing times are usually for a condencer enlarger at a CI of 4.5. Increase developing times to get a CI of .6 for a diffused light source.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom