• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Concert in Los Angeles bans professional cameras

Moment of Spin

A
Moment of Spin

  • 0
  • 0
  • 44
Bad patch

H
Bad patch

  • 1
  • 0
  • 33

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
203,099
Messages
2,849,821
Members
101,667
Latest member
zappy
Recent bookmarks
0

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,915
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Los Angeles has banned all professional cameras at the Pershing Square concert. Originally meant to ban only video cameras, it now extends to analog and digital cameras that are not cell phones. The ACLU has joined the fight calling the move unconstitutional.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-pershing-photography-20170818-story.html
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-aclu-pershing-square-photos-20170812-story.html
https://petapixel.com/2017/08/07/los-angeles-bans-photos-concerts-public-park/
http://laist.com/2017/08/18/aclu_pershing_photo_ban.php
 
Whats the diff between a pro and non-pro camera? I certainly see lots of paid work done with iPhone's these days.
 
Any camera that is not a phone is being turned away.
 
This is a fairly routine practice at most concerts.

This case is a little different as it involves a public concert.
 
The difference here is the concerts are free concerts, paid for with taxpayers' money, being held in a public park. This is not a concert being put on by private business where there is an admission charge to get in a private venue.
 
After seeing ticket prices for concerts lately autographed photos should be handed out at the gate. Seems like my concert going days are over. I have a ticket stub from 1974 where I paid $4 USD to see Pink Floyd.
 
The only info google was able to find on this event is what it is free. Last time I went to free music it was not worth of listening, but to photograph people around. I think, organizers in LA are well aware of it. :smile:
 
We had Ted Nugent play the anniversary celebration where I work a few weeks ago. I had my D90 and was told no professional photos by a fellow employee! I'm obviously not a professional but Uncle Ted was such an anal portal it was unreal. In spite I took over a hundred photos too. :D
 
I can understand banning the click and clack of cameras at a music concert but I don't see what difference a camera would make at a rock concert.
 
This is quite normal at many concerts,...
But to my understanding in this case it is a free accessible concert on public ground. (I would not know how to ban photographing and even publication [with some restrictions] if it happened over here.)
 
If it is a free concert and camera phones are allowed, are the organisers able to give any kind of sensible explanation for their reasons?
...

It's just like pro golf or baseball. Apparently they're afraid that someone with a $50 Nikon D50 from 2005 will make a photo that outclasses the shots from their hired publicity photographers and they'll lose money. It doesn't occur to them that someone would even have a film camera.
 
It's just like pro golf or baseball. Apparently they're afraid that someone with a $50 Nikon D50 from 2005 will make a photo that outclasses the shots from their hired publicity photographers and they'll lose money. It doesn't occur to them that someone would even have a film camera.
However it appears that they are not afraid of anyone with a camera phone being able to outclass them? With that many people using camera phones and depending on how close anyone can get I'd have thought we are into the territory of the million monkeys on a million typewriters eventually typing "Hamlet"

pentaxuser
 
So any Cameracamera is being turned away? Pocket point and shoots? Or just SLR style cameras?
 
I can understand banning the click and clack of cameras at a music concert but I don't see what difference a camera would make at a rock concert.
These? :D


1200px-Agfa-clack.jpg

216721a3bf09163b80020aa3dbb2b0f5.jpg
 
Last edited:
Well yes thanks but that came by because I dont know what is meant by the "click and clack cameras" in your post. :smile: You know you can allways come around ignorance by being the fool of the class :D
 
I can understand banning the click and clack of cameras at a music concert but I don't see what difference a camera would make at a rock concert.

There can be a multitude of reasons, often performers want to look their best and may only permit accredited photographers shooting in the first two or three songs/numbers, that's not happened to me but I know it goes on.

I've shot many concerts where the no professional camera rule has been very strictly applied, and they mean any camera capable of high quality results even an old SLR film or digital.

Ian
 
Concerts for Ariana Grande have banned cameras and a lot of other stuff at all venues here in Australia, consistent with a worldwide movement in view of recent events.
 
That's the thing abut terrorism. It cannot be stopped,even curtailing it is a futile effort. I believe having more cameras/photographers about would make it easier to capture any wrongdoers. It is unfortunate that the law abiding lose out in this era.
 
I believe in the Pershing Square case because it is a free public concert series, by limiting the concertgoers rights to bring cameras, it infringes on their right to free speech/expression.
 
I have a radical idea: allow cameras at such events and see what happens.
 
It may just be they think it will enhance the concert for non-photographers.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom