Concerning long exposure photography for a beginner

Lacock Abbey detail

A
Lacock Abbey detail

  • 0
  • 1
  • 21
Tyndall Bruce

A
Tyndall Bruce

  • 0
  • 0
  • 39
TEXTURES

A
TEXTURES

  • 4
  • 0
  • 65
Small Craft Club

A
Small Craft Club

  • 2
  • 0
  • 60
RED FILTER

A
RED FILTER

  • 1
  • 0
  • 51

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,905
Messages
2,782,826
Members
99,743
Latest member
HypnoRospo
Recent bookmarks
0

Neil Kelly

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2016
Messages
18
Location
Bath, England
Format
35mm
Hi all,

I'll be going away for a long weekend to Oslo this coming weekend, and I'd like to try and do some long exposures of the city/water/sky etc. I've not done this before so I'm trying to wrap my head around the calculations and where reciprocity failure comes into things

If for example, I have a metered exposure time of say 1/10th second, and I want to use a 6 stop ND filter (ND64) - giving an exposure time of 6.4 seconds according to this page - http://www.vassilistangoulis.com/gr/?p=4958

Do I then count this extended time as the psuedo metered time for calculating reciprocity failure correction?

In this example, if I were using Ilford Delta 100, this would then give a corrected exposure time of 10.4 seconds (per the document on the Ilford website here (https://www.ilfordphoto.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Reciprocity-Failure-Compensation.pdf)

Does this workflow and method of working make sense? I can find information on reciprocity failure corrections and on using ND filters separately but I can't seem to find much on both together (if I'm being a bit simple, I apologise!)

I know this might seem very simple, but I just wanted to double check with the gurus here before I go off and make a fool of myself (and waste film!)

All replies and advice greatly appreciated :smile:
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,008
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Do I then count this extended time as the psuedo metered time for calculating reciprocity failure correction?
Yes.
One thing to remember when you start working with materials that suffer from reciprocity failure is that although we often talk about that failure in terms of long exposure times, the cause of that failure is actually due to the intensity of the light hitting the film being too low to cause the film to respond "normally". Anything that reduces that intensity of light at the film - small apertures, bellows extension, ND filters - can force you into making reciprocity failure adjustments.
Of course, this only applies to the sort of reciprocity failure that occurs with long, dim exposures. There are different considerations with the sort of reciprocity failure that occurs with very short, very intense exposures (like high power electronic flashes).
 

jonasfj

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2013
Messages
198
Format
35mm
There is a smartphone app called Reciprocity Timer for $1.99. It contains a database of the most common films and I have used it with pretty good results. I always bracket my shots with additonal -30% and +30% exposure times.
 

bernard_L

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
2,038
Format
Multi Format
Your first reference is just a long write-up of the equation 10ND. The real tricky part, reciprocity failure, is not addressed.
If you use Ilford film, just use the extra correction as per Ilford recommendation. They should know. Other films: Foma films are worse (larger corrections). Acros is better (smaller correction).

Something else: in night shots, quite often, the light sources are in the field of view, like metering by pointing the meter at the sun. In that respect, the table indicated by Sirius Glass might be more reliable than a light meter. But, your OP mentions long exposures, not night shots.

Finally, IMHO, +/-30% bracket is virtually insignificant for b/w negative You would not see the difference between two frames on the negative. If your don't believe me, just try. In your situation, I would just shoot nominal and +2 stops. Negative b/w (except slow films like PanF) is extremely tolerant of overexposure.
 

jonasfj

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2013
Messages
198
Format
35mm
Finally, IMHO, +/-30% bracket is virtually insignificant for b/w negative You would not see the difference between two frames on the negative. If your don't believe me, just try. In your situation, I would just shoot nominal and +2 stops. Negative b/w (except slow films like PanF) is extremely tolerant of overexposure.

I have tried many times and the 30% bracketing works very well for me and I see a significant difference:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/jonas_fjellstedt/28945704312/in/dateposted-public/
 

Ste_S

Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2017
Messages
396
Location
Birmingham, UK
Format
Multi Format
I wouldn't worry too much about being spot on - as others have said modern film has a very forgiving latitude.
I've just started going out myself at night with a tripod, cable release and Mamiya C330. I measure my exposure times from Lightmeter Pro iPhone app and anything less than 10secs I'll count in my head, otherwise I'll use the timer on my phone.
So for the results have been good, although I'm started experimenting with 5min+ exposures so will see how those turn out..
 

bernard_L

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
2,038
Format
Multi Format

MrBrowning

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
681
Location
Upstate NY
Format
Multi Format
Here is a chart I made up for most Ilford films based on the new reciprocity numbers they provide for night photography. It's easier to carry the chart than to have to pull my phone out to do the math on a cold night. So far It's worked well for me. Delta 3200 should have been grouped with Pan F and I forgot to add SFX on there when I made it up. At some point I'll make those correction.

Edit: If you are using a filter the Metered time in the chart would be the actual metered time + your filter. As said I made this with night photography in mind.
 

Attachments

  • output.jpg
    output.jpg
    107.4 KB · Views: 105

jonasfj

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2013
Messages
198
Format
35mm
Congratulations for the really nice pictures. However, I cannot see how they support the statement that +30% exposure makes a visible difference on a b/w negative.
You just have to take my word for it. I'm bothering scanning and processing the lesser negatives. Obviously, if I did not see a benefit from my way of bracketing.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom