Comparison of UK / EU market selenium toners

Fantasyland!

D
Fantasyland!

  • 7
  • 1
  • 59
perfect cirkel

D
perfect cirkel

  • 2
  • 1
  • 111
Thomas J Walls cafe.

A
Thomas J Walls cafe.

  • 4
  • 5
  • 207

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,743
Messages
2,780,191
Members
99,690
Latest member
besmith
Recent bookmarks
0

Tom Kershaw

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
4,974
Location
Norfolk, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
I realise product comparison posts have caused problems in the past so I hope this thread is reasonable.

In his toning book, Tim Rudman gives a particular recommendation for the Maco selenium toner. I have been using the Fotospeed product. Has anyone made a comparison of selenium toners, or noticed any significant differences between the various brands?

I'm aware of these brands on the UK market:

- Kodak KRST

- Fotospeed SLT20

- Maco selenium toner (apparently contains 3% sodium selenite)

- ILFORD Harman selenium toner

- Moersch MT1 (via Germany)

Tom.
 

Martin Aislabie

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 17, 2007
Messages
1,413
Location
Stratford-up
Format
4x5 Format
Tom, I haven't done a print comparison of the various toners - so thanks for posting first - you can draw all the flak :D

But I have been wondering the same thing as you

The only thing I have noticed was that the Maco is 3% and all the others are 2% strength.

From reading Tim Rudmans’ book it seem that there are just too many factors affecting Toning performance that my comparisons are only good for me & may well be very different from yours - yet both equally true :confused:

Good luck

Martin
 
OP
OP

Tom Kershaw

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
4,974
Location
Norfolk, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
Tom, I haven't done a print comparison of the various toners - so thanks for posting first - you can draw all the flak :D
Good luck

Martin

As selenium toner is both long lasting and relatively expensive, I may purchase a bottle of another brand, e.g. the Maco product, and make some not exactly scientific comparisons. You're right to mention all the variables in the toning process making comparisons difficult.

Tom.
 

Leon

Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2003
Messages
2,075
Location
UK
Format
Medium Format
In my unscientific opinion, based on using the maco and harman products a lot recently and some advice from others - If you're looking for dramatic colour shifts etc - get the Maco - it is much easier to force split tones and strong effects using it. I dont know if this is purely down to it's strength, or other factors, but it works. The effects I get with it mixed at 1:10-1:15 are more pronounced than I experience with the Harman toner at strengths of 1:5ish.

I have used the kodak and fotospeed toners, but not for about 5 years. The fotospeed was similar to the harman IIRC - needed quite strong solutions to get any colour shifts.

I'd get some and give it a go - best way is to find out for yourself.
 

ath

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2006
Messages
844
Location
Germany
Format
35mm
- Maco selenium toner (apparently contains 3% sodium selenite)

Maco has reformulated their selenium toner due to new laws in the EU. According to this post of MACOs marketing guy the content has been reduced under 1%.

It is not clear, if this is really mandatory; Fotoimpex (Adox) states that a higher content is ok as long as it is documented properly.

You might want to check twice before buying when you are after a high selenium content.
 

Leon

Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2003
Messages
2,075
Location
UK
Format
Medium Format
Maco has reformulated their selenium toner due to new laws in the EU. According to this post of MACOs marketing guy the content has been reduced under 1%.

It is not clear, if this is really mandatory; Fotoimpex (Adox) states that a higher content is ok as long as it is documented properly.

You might want to check twice before buying when you are after a high selenium content.

that is bad news and I imagine it's bound to affect how it works
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,586
Location
Eugene, Oregon
Format
4x5 Format
The EU has standardized everything from condom size to the amount of curve allowed in bananas offered for sale. There is a real standardization mania here that often stifles variety and individuality. That said, since selenium is toxic and bad for the environment, it makes sense to set limits for the strength of a solution that gets sent through the mail and shipped without any hazmat considerations. The Europeans seem to be a little more careful than we in the US. A similar thing happens with developer concentrates: the Euro HC-110 is much less concentrated and needs to be diluted much less than the North American variety.

Best,

Doremus Scudder
www.DoremusScudder.com
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom