jtk
Member
Rigid notions of "subject" are not a rule, they are just the way some people think.
What flavor of fanatic theology entitles some folks to define "apology" for everyone else?
America has even more innocent blood on its hands as a result of mass genocide of Native Americans than Japan has for its Philippine atrocities.
Sorry, you are wrong. We didn't slaughter Native Americans in a mass genocide, 90% died out as a result of being infected with diseases that they were not immune to. Certainly we didn't treat them as well as we should have, in many cases they were treated horribly but that doesn't equate to a genocide. The issue is MUCH more complex than "Europeans came to America and slaughtered everyone in their path..."
Not even close.
But as a rule especially in political argument the much weaker side tries to shift the subject to a different arena with the "But what about ... ?" tactic because they are loosing.
Sorry, you are wrong. We didn't slaughter Native Americans in a mass genocide, 90% died out as a result of being infected with diseases that they were not immune to. Certainly we didn't treat them as well as we should have, in many cases they were treated horribly but that doesn't equate to a genocide. The issue is MUCH more complex than "Europeans came to America and slaughtered everyone in their path..."
Not even close.
May we assume you mean "losing" ?
of captured American soldiersOn the death marches the Japanese officers on horse back just lopped of heads of captured soldiers, a violation of Geneva convents. Japan also tortured, enslaved and staved captured solders which was a violation of the Geneva conventions. The Japanese army also committed mass rape in China which is a violation of the Geneva conventions. Those are war crimes. And the list is quite long. What you are talking about is a war that the US should not have entered, but that is not a war crime. You need to do a little research before you post.
... blah blah blahviolation of the Geneva conventions
blah blah blah
... blah blah blah
you actually think people who commit autrocities care about geneva conventions ?
even bofore hte geneva conventions exixted and there were were war crimes tribunals
for example regarding the turks and the genocide they committed ( the word genocide was coined because of them )
nothing happened .. and the world shurgged its shoulders. and STILL 100+ years later the no admission of guilt / acknowledgment ...
people who commit autrocitities couldn't care less about international conventions .. genocidal mainiacs
even use them as examples ( hitler saying " the turks did it no one remembers the armenians " )
look at africa, the balkan wars .. the current thing in the middle east /south-central asia ///
if people cared about the geneva covention they wouldnt' do the stuff they do ...
and yes people living in the USA committed genocide against the aboriginal population.
no clue how anyone could say anythng different than that. massacring women and children in a swamp ?
using a small pox infected blanket as chemical warefare ?
revisionist histury is a real drag.
Of course any country violating the Geneva Conventions will not care. But that is not the point. The point is that General MacArthur gave the Japanese a pass on War crimes including the comfort women while General Eisenhower made sure that the local people saw the death camps and General Marshall had the war trails. Germany faced their past directly. Japan has only recently faced it and is still in denial.
exactly they don't care, so, whats the point ? higher ground ?
especially by a country that dropped atomic bombs on another country ..
Like it or not dropping the atomic bomb in not a war crime and never was. If the bomb had been perfected sooner it would have been dropped on Germany. It either case it would have shortened the war and saved lives.
May we assume you mean "losing" ?
Truly attempting to be helpful. We all make mistakes, certainly I do and I get called on them. When I am corrected I take it as a learning experience, or because I truly should have known better I slap my forehead calling myself a dumbo. Yes, my forehead has a permanent dent.@Ranger Ric thank you ! mr sirius glass made it a point to lambast me several months ago because
i spelled some words wrong ... too funny.
@Ranger Ric thank you ! mr sirius glass made it a point to lambast me several months ago because
i spelled some words wrong ... too funny.
And I see that you managed to survive.
Yes, I made a typo. It just shows that like most of the rest of us that we are all human. At least I am able to figure out the intricacies of the shift key.
Yes, but I assumed that you could figure that out.
@Sirius Glass: There is not a word in the English language, loosing. Think lose as in lost, loss, losing, all with a singular letter o.
As for figuring it out, that is not a readers job. Loosing for losing is a common spelling error, and many folks do not know that difference. You should see the spelling errors, punctuation errors and grammar errors coming across our desk; appalling. Thus JTK is attempting to be helpful; politely say "thank you" and learn from it.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |