Combining benzotriazole and bromide

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
200,475
Messages
2,808,570
Members
100,273
Latest member
GreyFelis
Recent bookmarks
0

2F/2F

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
8,031
Location
Los Angeles,
Format
Multi Format
Hello,

I am just starting to experiment with a fridge full of old paper that was "given" to me for $20.00. Lots of old Ilfochrome paper, lots of old black and white, some of it expired in the '40s, most expired in '50s-'70s.

A lot of the paper prints fine in the black and such, but, as expected, is fogged in the highlights. The tonality is great, but I am looking to clear the fog a bit.

I have used Kodak Anti-Fog tablets several times on old film, and it helped. I know they don't have these any more, but they used to have several versions; some for film, some for paper, etc.

I have read on this forum that both benzotriazole and potassium bromide can have anti-fog effects, but work in different ways, and cause cool and warm tones, respectively.

My question is: what happens when you mix them? To try this, how much should I use? My developer is Ilford MG, and I usually use two liters at a time. Will anti-fogging agents work in a diluted A+B litho developer, or will the long developing times pretty much make them useless?

Thank you in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

haryanto

Member
Joined
May 2, 2005
Messages
167
Format
4x5 Format
my paper in rol, i have to trim it, it seem my safelight too bright, so got fog in my Ilford MG, i try a few Bzt n bromide alone n several combinations but couldnt get rid grey in highlight, i read at silvegrain, that's true nothing we can do with paper fog http://silvergrain.org/wiki/Fogged_Paper
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,321
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
In some dev formulae both are used, particularly Ilford PQ paper developers that were the PQ variants of older MQ formulae.

These PQ type developers tend to be cleaner working, less prone to base fog anyway, so if you can use one rather than something like Dektol/D72 and add additional Benzotriazole & KBr that will help and also boost the overall contrast slightly.

There's definitely no problem adding both.

Ian
 

haryanto

Member
Joined
May 2, 2005
Messages
167
Format
4x5 Format
....... and add additional Benzotriazole & KBr that will help and also boost the overall contrast slightly. There's definitely no problem adding both. Ian[/QUOTE said:
that's true Ian, for fresh paper, i used them both, cut the bromide to 1/3 and add Benzotriazole 25ml 1% solutions per liter get good highlight, in my eyes better than if i used it bromide or Benzotriazole alone
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,321
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
With a PQ developer if you use KBr alone you get warmer tones, Benzotriazole alone colder tones. PQ developers are inherently slightly warmer than the equivalent MQ version. This is why both are normally used to give relatively neutral tones.

If it was an aerial fogging question then adding Sodium or Potassium Metabisulphite is highly beneficial, and works exceptionally well.

Ian
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,321
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
I thought it was the other way around.
Wayne

Yes that's right in one respect, but that's because of the addition of Benzotriazole to control the tones.

A typical example is Ilford ID-20, ID-62 & ID-78

All have

Hydroquinone 12g
Sodium Sulphite 50g
Potassium Carbonate 60g (ID-78 62g)

plus

ID-20
Metol 3g
Potassium Bromide 2g

ID-62
Phenidone 0.5g
Potassium Bromide 2g
Benzotriazole 20ml (1% soln)

ID-78 Warm Tone Developer
Phenidone 0.5g
Potassium Bromide 4.5g

There's also a variant of ID-62 published with no Benzotriazole, this gives slightly warmer tones than ID-62 or ID-20

Essentially ID-62 and ID-78 are just PQ variants of the much older Ilford ID-20 formula. To achieve neutral tones with a PQ developer you must add Benzotriazole.

Ian
 

Wayne

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
3,622
Location
USA
Format
Large Format
Yes that's right in one respect, but that's because of the addition of Benzotriazole to control the tones.

I thought the benzotriazole was there because phenidone is not very sensitive to the restraining action of kbr, not to control the tone.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,321
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
Wayne, I have the 1954 article where Ilford describe varios Phenidone developers, they had only begun commercial production of Phenidone a couple of years before. This is what Ilford said:

"For high speed negative materials which tend to run into fog, particularly with forced development, the addition of an organic antifogging agent is an advantage although this is unnecessary where the developer has been buffered to have a pH of less than 9 at working strength. The type of antifogging agent and the concentration employed is a matter of choice depending upon the type of material to be developed and the characteristics required. Benzotriazole, for example, is particularly useful for universal and contact paper developers, since it also has the effect of modifying the tone of the silver image so that this becomes the cold blue-black which is generally considered desirable with contact prints. With developers used for negative materials, other fog restrainers which do not influence the colour of the image can be employed. It should be remembered, however, that too liberal use of any antifogging agent can result in a slowing of development, a drop in speed and a loss in the maximum density of the silver image, so that additions should not exceed those recommended for a particular purpose by the suppliers."

Most published lford PQ developer for papers are generally Universal type developers, so contain Benzotriazole, the exception is ID-78 the warm tone developer.

None of the published Ilford PQ film developers contain Benzotriazole.

Ian
 
OP
OP

2F/2F

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
8,031
Location
Los Angeles,
Format
Multi Format
Thanks Ian.

So, what would be a good PQ developer to use? Right now I use Ilford Multigrade, and I don't know what type of developer it is. Do I need something else (like Ilford PQ, perhaps :smile:)?
 

Nicholas Lindan

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
4,289
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
Format
Multi Format
a fridge full of old paper ... I am looking to clear the fog a bit.

I have had luck clearing fog with a very short 5 second dip in 1/4 strength Farmer's reducer. There was no effect on highlight detail, or none that I could see. Neither benz nor bromide were able to do anything to remove the fog from this particular paper.

YMG2V (Your Mileage Guaranteed to Vary).
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,321
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
PQ Universal was always my main print developer and it gives fairly neutral tones, it's an excellent developer. Multigrade is fairly similar but slightly warmer working with some papers.

Now I no longer have a commercial darkroom my work-flow has dropped and I just make up whatever developer I require, which is usually warm-tone so ID-78.

Ian
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom