removedacct1
Member
Likewise today a lot of wet plate photographers don't bother too much about comets (little flakes of dried collodion that streak) and other defects because part of the charm is imperfect images in the era of digital perfection. Back then making perfect plates was a huge deal.
On the other hand, embracing poor technique for sake of incorporating artifacts into your work is about as genuine as highly processed HDR photos. If its not enhancing your work in any way other than "dirtying up" the image, then including a lot of sloppy artifacts for their own sake isn't a meaningful practice. Too many people learn how to make sloppy, artifact-heavy work without ever learning how to make clean work and I think that's a shame. They will have to unlearn bad habits when/if they decide that dirty plates are a gimmick that no longer serves their purpose. Knowing how to make both clean and dirty plates is a skill set all wet plate photographers should have at their disposal.
I'm not suggesting that there is no place for wet plate photos that make use of process-driven artifacts, but what I do think is that a person can make great wet plate photographs that do not rely on artifacts to identify the work as uniquely "wet plate".