Cinestill 50D

Icy Slough.jpg

H
Icy Slough.jpg

  • 0
  • 0
  • 9
Roses

A
Roses

  • 6
  • 0
  • 105
Rebel

A
Rebel

  • 6
  • 4
  • 127
Watch That First Step

A
Watch That First Step

  • 2
  • 0
  • 85
Barn Curves

A
Barn Curves

  • 3
  • 1
  • 72

Forum statistics

Threads
197,490
Messages
2,759,902
Members
99,517
Latest member
RichardWest
Recent bookmarks
1

George Mann

Member
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
2,837
Location
Denver
Format
35mm
This is a great film, which blows me away. It has a more subdued version of the Fuji color pallet (which I don't normally like).

Anyone else like or use it?
 

Mesabound

Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2020
Messages
50
Location
US
Format
Multi Format
I was just thinking about picking up another roll. I found the contrast a little too muted and the colors a little too pastel on first go-around, but did get some nice images. Just got some great results w/ 800T under studio lights so I'm definitely going to give each some more experimentation. I've attached my favorite image from the first 50D roll I shot (35mm). The contrast and saturation were better for me in shade.

The grain is finer than any other color film I've shot
 

Attachments

  • scan0162.jpg
    scan0162.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 100

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,950
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I experimented with it (actually Vision 3 50D, which is the same but with the remjet still on), but have up on it as the color balance wouldn't play nice with RA4 paper. The crossover was unmanageable.
Would I be correct in assuming you developed the film in C41?
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,950
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Apart from a single try which was utterly hopeless, no. It was ecn2 developed.
Thanks.
That really highlights how different motion picture (ECN2) and still film negative (C41) films are.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,950
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
What is the reason for this difference? The desired output or the need for different processing for logistical reasons? (I know nothing about ECN2)
ECN2 film is designed to be printed to different media - projection stock, designed for ECP development.
The film's three colour emulsions are contrast matched to the colour emulsions in that projection material.
C41 films are designed to be printed to paper that is designed for RA4 development.
Their three colour emulsions are contrast matched to the colour emulsions in that material.
Optimizing something for a projection medium is always going to lead to major differences from something optimized for a reflective medium.
In the real world now, both types of films are also set up for digital intermediate steps, but the optimizations are still very different.
And you get crossover when the contrast behavior of the three colour emulsions isn't well matched to each other, when the characteristics of the presentation medium are taken into account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom