Cibachrome/Ilfochrome

Mansion

A
Mansion

  • 0
  • 0
  • 11
Lake

A
Lake

  • 1
  • 0
  • 10
One cloud, four windmills

D
One cloud, four windmills

  • 0
  • 0
  • 10
Priorities #2

D
Priorities #2

  • 0
  • 0
  • 8
Priorities

D
Priorities

  • 0
  • 0
  • 9

Forum statistics

Threads
199,015
Messages
2,784,653
Members
99,772
Latest member
samiams
Recent bookmarks
0

reinierv

Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
25
Format
Large Format
Anyone ever thought if it would be possible to recreate this?
Would it be very complex?
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
The chemistry is rather straight forward however recreating the paper would be a problem. Are the Ciba and Ilford patents still in effect? You would also have to find a company willing to manufacture the paper. This would be very difficult with the diminishing interest in analog photography.
 

Rudeofus

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
5,081
Location
EU
Format
Medium Format
PhotoEngineer claims it's one of the easiest color processes to fully create yourself, but that doesn't mean one can do it as a first time home brew project. Expect a few years of learning, researching and experimenting before you have something worthwhile, but according to him it can be done without special facilities.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Ilford did not invent Silver-dye-bleach materials nor have they been the only ones to make such.

As with all these type of resurection questions: a lot had been made and a lot can be made.

But, will it be made?
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Kodachrome, like Dye Bleach is easy to re-create - when compared to E6 and C41 type materials. It is still a lengthy and complex job. I know intellectually how to do the DB, and in-fact have done it at EK. Here at home I have made a single color layer and it worked, so it is doable. Same with KChrome. Do able. I have not tried, but I hear of experimenters who are trying to do it, but not commercially.

PE
 

Athiril

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
3,062
Location
Tokyo
Format
Medium Format
Kodachrome, like Dye Bleach is easy to re-create - when compared to E6 and C41 type materials. It is still a lengthy and complex job. I know intellectually how to do the DB, and in-fact have done it at EK. Here at home I have made a single color layer and it worked, so it is doable. Same with KChrome. Do able. I have not tried, but I hear of experimenters who are trying to do it, but not commercially.

PE

If someone can make a Kodachrome type film... that is multilayer B&W that's split with spectral sensitisation.. couldn't they just add rudimentary dye couplers in each layer? Ones that aren't water soluble for some basic colour film not necessarily matched to E-6 or C-41 process.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Making the coupler dispersions (if the chemicals were obtainable) would be the problem there. There is no such thing as a "rudimentary" coupler, but there are "rudimentary" azo dyes.

PE
 
OP
OP

reinierv

Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
25
Format
Large Format
@photo engineer

You say it would be possible and not too complex...
would it be possible to make it like liquid emulsion? BW is easy to put on all sorts of materials, but for color I found nothing.
I think there would be a market for that
 

Rudeofus

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
5,081
Location
EU
Format
Medium Format
You'd have to make it at least "three liquid emulsions", one for each color channel.
 
Joined
Mar 2, 2007
Messages
1,464
Format
Medium Format
I thought Stephen Frizza was working on this... ?

Maybe one day! At the moment I'm quietly trying to teach myself Dye Transfer Printing.
 
Joined
Dec 2, 2011
Messages
693
Location
Memphis, TN
Format
35mm
A few months ago, I received a small supply of Cibachrome/Ilfochrome paper in a trade. Without the required chemistry, can I do anything with it at all with regular B&W or C-41 chemistry at all, even experimenting? Or is it good for nothing at this point?
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
You cannot get any sort of image from B&W or chromogenic color development using dye bleach materials. The material will remain totally black. Only with the special bleach solution will there be color. And the imaging dyes are all azo dyes, which are a special class of colored organic chemicals. I use Solantine Yellow, Solantine Pink and Chicago Blue. None of these are noted for good light stability, and the Chicago Blue is, as its name says, blue and not cyan. So my images are not perfect.

PE
 

Rudeofus

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
5,081
Location
EU
Format
Medium Format
Can I buy the dyes and inkjet on paper ? Or Can I inject the emulsions ? How many dyes per emulsion ? One or more ?

I have very little (and unsuccessful) experience with B&W liquid emulsion so far, but the biggest challenge I see with inkjetting it will be the required temperature. Liquid emulsion is not liquid at room temperature, and I predict this will cause all kinds of issues with inkjet nozzles.
 
Joined
Dec 2, 2011
Messages
693
Location
Memphis, TN
Format
35mm
Thanks for the info. I was hoping I could at least use it for photograms, contact prints, or some such. Sounds like it's totally worthless, then.
 

Wayne

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
3,614
Location
USA
Format
Large Format
You could trade for some worthless p30 chemicals
 
Joined
Nov 2, 2005
Messages
2,034
Location
Cheshire UK
Format
Medium Format
Dear All,

SDB Silver Dye Bleach process is very easily understood... anybody out there who can coat 19 distinct layers in two passes through a coating machine at 70m per minute.......should be a piece of cake.....?

Anyone could do it as long as they were called ILFORD / Eastman KODAK / FUJI / Agfa Gaveart.

Simon ILFORD Photo / HARMAN technology Limited :
 

Rudeofus

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
5,081
Location
EU
Format
Medium Format
Anyone could do it as long as they were called ILFORD / Eastman KODAK / FUJI / Agfa Gaveart.

The question remains: for how many minutes would this machine have to run to make this a worthwhile effort for Harman/Ilford? And how much would such a minimal run cost (an order of magnitude estimate would probably do)?
 

eng1er

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
105
Format
Multi Format
I would love to have me some Cibachrome again. Unfortunately, even 10,000 like-minded individuals probably wouldn't justify Ilford's rereleasing it. Once galleries/museums/archives (or their budgets) decided that digitization and it's attendant printing options was the best workflow for transparencies, there was no going back. Close enough for government work as they say. Seems to be the way of the world these days. Sad to lose those processes.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Dear All,

SDB Silver Dye Bleach process is very easily understood... anybody out there who can coat 19 distinct layers in two passes through a coating machine at 70m per minute.......should be a piece of cake.....?

Anyone could do it as long as they were called ILFORD / Eastman KODAK / FUJI / Agfa Gaveart.

Simon ILFORD Photo / HARMAN technology Limited :

And I just did a 6 layer coating for demonstration purposes! I know how hard it is. But, I can do it at home, handcoating one layer at a time, and I can do it with 9 layers or less. However, I never will claim that it has the quality of Ilfords product. Just as a chromogenic color product would be far worse than any E6 or C41 product. The defects alone, which accumulate with handcoating many layers will set you back.

Even so, dye bleach is possible, but no color material will be "good" if made at home.

PE
 

Bob Carnie

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
7,735
Location
toronto
Format
Med. Format RF
Labs world wide were making Cibachromes via laser printers for years... Ilford (Switzerland) were basically incompetent in their marketing and delivery of the product.

I had orders to complete and would be consistently screwed over in material supply problems... Finally it was impossible to get timely product and therefore my lab and others decided it was an impossible product to deliver and make profitable.

I had been printing Cibachrome optically with complex masking for over 20 years before I started printing them digitally.. the digital prints actually were better IMO . Budget was not a concern as optical prints with masks were every bit as expensive as digital print.. the price did not go down.

I do not miss Cibachrome.. for example people will boast that they were more permanent than RA4- in light both have the same basic problems.. ciba's secret were their dark storage capabilities.





I would love to have me some Cibachrome again. Unfortunately, even 10,000 like-minded individuals probably wouldn't justify Ilford's rereleasing it. Once galleries/museums/archives (or their budgets) decided that digitization and it's attendant printing options was the best workflow for transparencies, there was no going back. Close enough for government work as they say. Seems to be the way of the world these days. Sad to lose those processes.
 

eng1er

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
105
Format
Multi Format
I wish I had any optical printing process available for transparencies.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom