Thanks Andrew. I shoot a lot of Superpan 200. Primarily because it has a polyester base but now you seemed to have have verified the extended red properties.
Hmm...I'm not sure what conclusions to draw from that, Andy. I couldn't see much of a Wood effect but maybe it was not the best sort of foliage for it or not yet advanced enough into the Wood season for the IR effect
Hmm...I'm not sure what conclusions to draw from that, Andy. I couldn't see much of a Wood effect but maybe it was not the best sort of foliage for it or not yet advanced enough into the Wood season for the IR effect
I think it was because there wasn't much IR energy about at the time... But there certainly was a lot more Wood Effect than would a conventional film wood, er...would give...
Agfa Aviphot Pan 200 is sold for aerial photography and for this purpose gives a high contrast as the land photographed has relatively low contrast. I believe it is sold in 35mm eg as Rollei Retro 400s.The resolution is up to 181 lppm. For aerial photography it is developed in Agfa G74c plus...
Agfa Aviphot Pan 200 is sold for aerial photography and for this purpose gives a high contrast as the land photographed has relatively low contrast. I believe it is sold in 35mm eg as Rollei Retro 400s.The resolution is up to 181 lppm. For aerial photography it is developed in Agfa G74c plus...
I agree that it is most likely Aviphot 200. The scene I was working with in the video was normal subject brightness range... It was in the morning, so I believe IR energy was quite low. The film performed better at at EI 3, with the 720 filter. I'll be taking this film out, along with Rollei IR, on a bright sunny afternoon very shorty