Carl zeiss 35mm f/1.4 or f/2.0?

[Diapositivo]

Yes the site is digital oriented but is also hosts articles about films. I certainly don't agree with everything Michael Reichmann writes but I normally find him interesting.

The eternal diatribe about digital - film was conducted with "true pixels" web comparisons in any case. I don't think the test was well conducted (and in any case only tested for resolution) but he never compared Canon 1DsI and 6x7 film by showing the images reduced to 1mp.

I just read, on that site, a nice article about the superior image experience given by a slide:

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/what_slide_film_taught_me.shtml

Photographers of all persuasions collaborate with the site although it is, in general, more digital oriented.

 

[dreamingartemis]

Hi,
Thanks for all the info, I've more or less made my decision on which one to get since I'm predominantly a film user. Will post pics back here once I've run it through it paces.

 

[Richard S. (rich815)]

Hi,
Thanks for all the info, I've more or less made my decision on which one to get since I'm predominantly a film user. Will post pics back here once I've run it through it paces.

So? Which is it??

 

[dreamingartemis]

So? Which is it??

At the risk of reviving a zombie thread, in the end I bough the 35mm f/2. Heaps lighter physically and on the wallet as well