I had the same experience two days ago with an electronic flash unit made around 1985 that had sat unused for years. At first, it took a long time to charge its main capacitor, but after being charged and discharged a few times, it was fine and would recharge in a few seconds. I've heard this called "forming a capacitor".
Electrolytic capacitors can also dry out. In Minolta X-series cameras, the symptom is the shutter won't fire. In flash units, as parts of the capacitor short out, you hear loud POPs that you'll never forget. Don't ask me how I know...
I've been in the habit of removing batteries from all my cameras after use. I do that to avoid battery leakage damage, since I have too many cameras that I rarely use (who woulda thunk).
This habit has served me well, for the most part, but I've recently discovered an unexpected downside.
It appears that some of the electronics in cameras does not like to remain unpowered for long periods of time (years). I suspect it may be the capacitors. I say this, since I've had three recent cases where the metering system was wonky after installing fresh batteries on a camera that was stored for long periods without batteries. They were a Minolta XE-7, Minolta XD-11, and an Olympus OM-4. After installing the batteries the meter system was very unstable, and the camera just wouldn't work properly. If I leave the batteries in the camera, in the "on" position overnight, then they all worked fine the next morning.
My suspicion is that the capacitors need some time to refresh themselves after long periods of dormancy, so leaving the camera powered overnight helped to do that.
Has anyone else had the same experience? Does anyone have a better explanation about what might be happening?
I try out my flashguns every few months, but never gave a thought about trying cameras as well.
The troublesome capacitors are most probably the big electrolytics, though there is nothing to be lost by running a dummy film through unused cameras with batteries in.
Thank you for the prompt.
I have an Olympus OM2n.Why use film at all -- unless the camera won't work without it?
I have an Olympus OM2n.
It has a clever metering system. Two systems in fact. One conventional in the viewfinder and the other off the film itself.
If the light changes on long exposures with the mirror up the reading is compensated by the system that uses the film plane to read from.
It's very ingenious.
I've been in the habit of removing batteries from all my cameras after use. I do that to avoid battery leakage damage, since I have too many cameras that I rarely use (who woulda thunk).
This habit has served me well, for the most part, but I've recently discovered an unexpected downside.
It appears that some of the electronics in cameras does not like to remain unpowered for long periods of time (years). I suspect it may be the capacitors. I say this, since I've had three recent cases where the metering system was wonky after installing fresh batteries on a camera that was stored for long periods without batteries. They were a Minolta XE-7, Minolta XD-11, and an Olympus OM-4. After installing the batteries the meter system was very unstable, and the camera just wouldn't work properly. If I leave the batteries in the camera, in the "on" position overnight, then they all worked fine the next morning.
My suspicion is that the capacitors need some time to refresh themselves after long periods of dormancy, so leaving the camera powered overnight helped to do that.
Has anyone else had the same experience? Does anyone have a better explanation about what might be happening?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?