If you want grey images, stick with Wal-Mart or Wal-greens processing and save yourself the trouble of scanning and posting.
Also what's up with the non-critique gallery??? Are we only supposed gush over them? Get rid of it.
Cheryl Jacobs said:some people don't want critique, so why waste peoples time by forcing it into a critique gallery?
Waste their time? I'm not sure I follow you.
Nige said:I've decided "Critique" galleries don't really work because the participants aren't prepared to put in the time, thought, whatever... that's needed to analyse every image posted.
Robert,roteague said:Nige,
I can understand where what you are trying to say, it is easy to get frustrated with the "Nice photo" type of comment. But, that is part of the critque process as well, sometimes a photo doesn't really require a "critical" comment. For example, Graeme Hird just posted some images to the Critique gallery, and I can't for the life of me see where they could be improved any.
Take heart,
Graeme Hird said:People are posting there because they think the image is lacking something (very few images are perfect) and they want help to improve.
Thank yourogueish said:Oh and TPPhotog, nice shot! Like the tones and the way you captured her concentration. I like yours better.
My apologies Art, I made a gross generalisation by projecting my own motivations.Art Vandalay said:That's not why I post there, necessarily. I feel good about the photo but I'm interested to see how others view it, even if it's not well received. However, I suppose if I got lambasted enough I might switch to the standard gallery...or not post at all!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?