There are cameras whose metering circuits work with cells whose voltage changes over time - with those cameras, an alkaline battery like an LR44 is suitable, assuming either that the nominal voltage of ~1.55V of the LR44 is suitable, or that the circuit has either been adjusted, or a voltage dropping adapter has been installed. As I understand it, _Brian is telling us that the Canonet QL17 GIII is one of those cameras.
That surprises me, because I was under the impression that the circuitry in that Canonet required a battery that supplied a more consistent voltage - either a higher voltage silver oxide cell, or the lower voltage zinc air substitute for the even more consistent mercury cells.
But I'm prepared to learn.
I used a Canonet QL17 G-III as a travel camera with alkaline batteries, for years after mercury batteries went away. I used the PX625A that is shaped like the original battery, and if I didn't have one of those I used the LR44 with a shim (aluminum foil or similar) because the LR44 is a little shorter. On these last small-body generation of Canonets, the battery inserts sideways, so it is real easy to shim. I usually adjusted the ISO setting by about a half stop to compensate. I only shot B&W and color negative film so it was less picky than slides.
My Canonet now has an issue with the meter where the needle stops at f/8, so I haven't been using the meter recently. My point here is that people make a huge deal out of the battery voltage thing when:
1. Many cameras work at least ok by just compensating the ISO, especially if you shoot film with latitude and use your brain when metering, since it isn't TTL, isn't fancy matrix metering, can be fooled by backlighting or bright sky like any meter, etc.
2. The working condition of the meter in a 40+ year old camera is at least as important as the battery voltage. If you don't at least test the meter (try a typical outdoor scene and an indoor scene), you don't know what you are going to get, regardless of battery.