Hi i know a few people on here have both which do you prefer for everyday use . I already have the F1n is it worth getting the New F1 .From what i have been able to glean from old reviews on the net they are two very different cameras .
They are very different. I own both. This is my take on it:
If you are comforable with partial metering and wish for no other kind of metering,
if you think the response speed of the F1n 's meter is good enough,
if you think the brightness of the F1n finder is good enough*,
If you have no need for knowing the aperture of the lens by looking at the viewfinder,
and you don't need aperture-priority automation,
if you need all speeds working without use of battery,
if you really really need mirror-lock-up,
if you don't wish the camera had better weather sealing,
if you value smooth winding film advance levers,
... Then stay with the F-1n.
Otherwise you'll prefer the Canon New F-1.
Both are great cameras, though. The above poster wrote:
"I'd say in real life usage, they're about equal"
I think that if the light conditions are favorable (that is, during the day) and you have no need of AE, and you like Partial metering, then yes, they are about equal in real life usage.
Internally, they are totally different.
* it can be upgraded by installing a Laser-matte screen.