Can you re-use hypo-clear and photo-flo?

Hydrangeas from the garden

A
Hydrangeas from the garden

  • 2
  • 2
  • 65
Field #6

D
Field #6

  • 7
  • 1
  • 78
Hosta

A
Hosta

  • 16
  • 10
  • 157
Water Orchids

A
Water Orchids

  • 5
  • 1
  • 90

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,923
Messages
2,766,906
Members
99,505
Latest member
juanfra
Recent bookmarks
0

brian steinberger

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 5, 2007
Messages
2,999
Location
Pennsylvania
Format
Med. Format RF
I've been using both one-shot since I started. I also mix both with distilled water. I was wondering if I could get away with reusing either solution and what the limit is. I'm talking about using these solutions for film development.
 

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,449
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
Photo-flo can be re-used, though lots of people do not. I'm not sure about hypo-clear, the manufacturers information sheet should say if you can and what the capacity would be.
 

Kilgallb

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Messages
808
Location
Calgary AB C
Format
4x5 Format
Kodak Hypo Clear specifically mentions capacity per gallon. It is about 100 to 150 8x10 sheets of film or the same number of 36 exposure 35 mm rolls per gallon. This assumes you pre-rinse the film before placing in the hypo clear.

I am not sure about paper as I amm strictly an RC man.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
Hypo-clear has a tendency to degrade after a while. Personally, I went the "expensive" way and mixes working strength solution each time I print FB. I try to print a decent number of prints, but nevertheless I discard the used HCA after the session.

If you buy the liquid versions, it's not that inconvenient, and is only a minor expense for your processing. You don't need distilled water for HCA, unless your tap is really bad. Tap water is already is a better fixer removal agent than distilled water anyway, and using it won't deplete your distilled water stock for nothing.

Photo-flo I will use for more than one roll only within the same session. Whether I develop 10 rolls or 2 rolls, I will dunk them one by one in the 500mL of photo-flo I prepared and then throw it away after use because I don't care enough to keep yet another bottle for it in my cabinet. Again, this is such a low expense, that I prefer being overly safe.
 

jeroldharter

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
1,955
Location
Wisconsin
Format
4x5 Format
Don't re-use hypo-clear. I can't remember the exact reasons, but it has a shelf life of about one day. I tried that in my Nova slot processor and it developed an awful scum that was hard to clean. Also, PermaWash is very cheap.

Likewise with PhotoFlo. A 16 oz bottle seems to last for life so why try it?
 

dpurdy

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2006
Messages
2,673
Location
Portland OR
Format
8x10 Format
Hypo clear does go bad in 24 hours if left in a tray. However you can pur it off in a bottle and keep using it about a month I think. The same is true for Orbit Bath which seems much more expensive untill you figure in dilutions and if you pour it off in a bottle after use, then it is pretty cheap.
 

PHOTOTONE

Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
2,412
Location
Van Buren, A
Format
Large Format
Photo-flo attracts dust. Best to use it once. It is very inexpensive. By attracting dust, I mean that any dust that comes in contact with it will sink, as Photo-flo reduces the surface tension of water. So there can be lots of dust in the solution if you reuse it much.
 

Tom Hoskinson

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
3,867
Location
Southern Cal
Format
Multi Format
I've been using both one-shot since I started. I also mix both with distilled water. I was wondering if I could get away with reusing either solution and what the limit is. I'm talking about using these solutions for film development.

HCA in its simplest form is a solution of Sodium Sulfite dissolved in water.

Sodium Sulfite solutions exposed to air are eventually oxidized to sodium sulfate.

If for some reason you feel you must use an HCA, I recommend using it as a one shot.
 

Kilgallb

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Messages
808
Location
Calgary AB C
Format
4x5 Format
Doesn't using Hypo Clear reduce the amount of water you use to wash your film or paper. This alone should be enough reason to use the stuff.
 

Tom Hoskinson

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
3,867
Location
Southern Cal
Format
Multi Format
How you wash depends a lot on how you fixed

Doesn't using Hypo Clear reduce the amount of water you use to wash your film or paper. This alone should be enough reason to use the stuff.

No, How you wash your film or paper depends a lot on how you fixed it. Film washes very quickly in a minimum amount of water if it was fixed in a rapid fixer that contained ammonium ion (no HCA bath needed).

Fiber base paper washes with the least water if it is fixed properly in a 2 fixing bath process. Selenium (or other) toning is required for best Fiber Print archival characteristics.
 
OP
OP
brian steinberger

brian steinberger

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 5, 2007
Messages
2,999
Location
Pennsylvania
Format
Med. Format RF
No, How you wash your film or paper depends a lot on how you fixed it. Film washes very quickly in a minimum amount of water if it was fixed in a rapid fixer that contained ammonium ion (no HCA bath needed).

Fiber base paper washes with the least water if it is fixed properly in a 2 fixing bath process. Selenium (or other) toning is required for best Fiber Print archival characteristics.

Tom,

What amount of time do you recommend washing film without a HCA? Also, what's the harm in using one?

Brian
 

Tom Hoskinson

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
3,867
Location
Southern Cal
Format
Multi Format
Tom,

What amount of time do you recommend washing film without a HCA? Also, what's the harm in using one?

Brian

Brian, IMHO it is best to determine the washing time required for your individual system based on residual Hypo testing.

What harm in using HCA? HCA's can cause their own problems if you do not wash them out properly.

I recommend that you read P.E.'s post on Fixing and Washing:
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
 

mmcclellan

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Messages
461
Location
Ann Arbor, M
Format
4x5 Format
Both of these are so cheap that it's hardly worth the risk to screw up processing by scrimping on the money side. Toss them both after a good use and don't risk any short or long term damage to a single print or piece of film.
 

dancqu

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
3,649
Location
Willamette V
Format
Medium Format
Dan, What's your reasoning for not using
a hypo clearing agent with film?

Hypo clearing agent is optional even with paper.
Ilford does not suggest the use of hca with film.
I use a little modified Ilford wash sequence;
allowing some time for soaking. Also the
wash water is at room temperature.

On reflection I do not recall any instructions calling
for the use of hca with film. RC paper is like film; an
emulsion on plastic. Dan
 

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
Selenium (or other) toning is required for best Fiber Print archival characteristics.

Only insofar as selenium toning is not partial. Polysulphide (brown toner) gives much better protection for partial toning.
 
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
105
Format
35mm
Hypo clear works great for getting rid of that purple cast in Tmax films. After 10+ years of using Hypo clear I found that it lasts about as long as rapid fixer. When the fixer is finally exhausted I change the hypo clear. Photo-flo is good for at least a week, depends on how much film you process and you should definitely use distilled water. Hypo-clear and photo-flo are cheap, but I don't think you really need to dump them every time you process film. I tend to use Kodak film due to it availability in may city so I can't really say what the best methods for Ilford film are.
 

dancqu

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
3,649
Location
Willamette V
Format
Medium Format
Only insofar as selenium toning is not partial.
Polysulphide (brown toner) gives much better
protection for partial toning.

The IPI has reported that sodium sulfide at 1:9,999
gives complete protection to microfilm. Microfilm's
emulsion is considered similar to paper's. Dan
 

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
The IPI has reported that sodium sulfide at 1:9,999
gives complete protection to microfilm. Microfilm's
emulsion is considered similar to paper's. Dan

Amazing, isn't it? I've also read that even merely dipping the negs for a few seconds in sulfide was already giving a huge protection boost. Not sure if that was in Haist or in Rudman's book.

I'm tempted to start sloshing my negs for about a minute in working strength brown toner before the final wash. Of course, after that I should start putting my negs in polyester sleeves instead of printfiles, according to Henry Whilhem anyway... Damn, it's a slippery slope!
 
Joined
Oct 25, 2004
Messages
1,057
Location
Westport, MA
Format
Large Format
I use hypo one-shot. I don't even mix a working solution, I take a tablespoon or so of the powder and mix it in hot water before use. I'm not sure if i'm mixing it too strongly or too weakly but it seems to work.. *shrug*
 

Kilgallb

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Messages
808
Location
Calgary AB C
Format
4x5 Format
I find Delta 100 sheets processed in a roller drum require double strength Hypo clear just to clear the anti-halation layer. If you do not use Hypo clear no amount of washing gets rid of that screen door effect on the back of the negative.
 

Tom Hoskinson

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
3,867
Location
Southern Cal
Format
Multi Format
I find Delta 100 sheets processed in a roller drum require double strength Hypo clear just to clear the anti-halation layer. If you do not use Hypo clear no amount of washing gets rid of that screen door effect on the back of the negative.
.

The rapid fixer that I use removes the antihalation and sensitizing dyes without using any HCA.

One or two tablespoons of Sodium Carbonate dissolved in a liter of water will remove the antihalation dye residue and the residual sensitizing dye as well. Sodium Carbonate is much better than HCA (i.e. Sodium Sulfite) for this purpose).

To get the dye off of the back of the negative you need to make sure you soak the back of the negative.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom