The main reasons I use a rangefinder camera:
1) The camera will work just fine with the lens cap on
2) The viewfinder is always sharp and clear, even when the lens is not focused properly
3) The viewfinder shows what exists to the upper left of your intended image
4) You can use a big wide-angle lenshood to block the lower part of the viewfinder if needed
6) You can block the lens with your fingers without ruining the image in the viewfinder
So pretty much from the above points, you better be smarter than average photographer.
As for burning hole in shutter, my Pentax MX has the same type of shutter as Leica. So far no issues...
Same shutter curtain type maybe, but in an SLR, it is protected by the mirror.
For me Olympus OM-1n + 28mm f/3.5 on street, but there are other SLRs which may be smaller in size.
A big thanks for all replies received so far. Apparently you need to use one to be able to fully appreciate its advantages. So far I have been using a Pentax MX + 50mm f1.9 for all street work with no problems. To be fair the MX is indeed very small by old-SLR standards.
Unfortunately the old GAS is kicking in so I might have a look at budget RF options out there. Any recommendations?
Unfortunately the old GAS is kicking in so I might have a look at budget RF options out there. Any recommendations?
The camera is uber reliable and cheap but some people cannot tolerate the eye position dependency.
Try
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonet_G-III_QL17
mine was 25GBP... only needed new foam in 10 years
Well apparently things have changed from when you got yours as prices have soared upwards. With 25 GBP you can only get one in "for parts only" condition...
Only significant advantage (for street) is the supposedly smaller size but a Fuji x100(digital) is about same size as my Nikon fg20! (electro-Gsn not much smaller)
The speed of shooting is not gonna matter in milli-seconds because the photographers reaction time is usually >.6/.7s (600-700 milli-seconds) not including the focus time or the composing time.
For street, unless it's a very quiet one you'll not find SLR shutters obtrusive.
As mentioned above - rangefinder vf is usually brighter than SLR so you'll have to learn to see stopped down yourself or you'll be quite disappointed with how the image turns out.
Sent from Tap-a-talk
Sometimes you need to anticipate what is about to happen but allow for the visual delay between the event and your perception.
Typically this delay is about 300ms but can be larger with fatigue or lack of concentration. Everything you see is historical!
Pre focus and use a wide angle then crop on easel.
The noise from a rangefinder is only the shutter. The SLR has the mirror, iris and shutter.
If you lock up the mirror on a OM1 you still get iris and shutter. (Some cameras have a lotta iris noise.)
If you lock up the mirror on a F2 you only get the shutter.
But the noise reaches the subject after the shot is 'in the can', all a quiet camera allows is a sequence of non situation aware subjects.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?