Can a Leica Summitar Be Restored?

Higher ups

D
Higher ups

  • 1
  • 0
  • 21
Approx. point-75

D
Approx. point-75

  • 3
  • 0
  • 29
Coal Harbour

H
Coal Harbour

  • 4
  • 2
  • 60
Aglow

D
Aglow

  • 0
  • 0
  • 55
Gilding the Lily Pads

H
Gilding the Lily Pads

  • 5
  • 2
  • 74

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
200,576
Messages
2,810,326
Members
100,305
Latest member
Owlch
Recent bookmarks
0

reddesert

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
2,549
Location
SAZ
Format
Hybrid
Not all radiation is the same. Both the energy and the type of particle matter; particle type matters because of the penetrating power - or lack thereof. The alpha particles from thorium are easily stopped by your skin, as others said up thread. For this reason owning a thoriated glass lens isn't particularly risky. (Reference for does estimates: https://www.orau.org/health-physics.../products-containing-thorium/camera-lens.html ) But modifying it in such a way that you could ingest some of the glass by breathing (such as polishing, grinding, breaking it) is not a good idea.

The reason radon gas is of concern in people's houses is because it is a gas, and thus can migrate out of the soil into your house air, at some low but measurable concentration, and be breathed in. And people spend a lot of time in their houses so both the concentration and exposure are significantly higher than they are outdoors.

Radiation and carcinogen risk are generally cumulative - for ex, radon exposure is much worse for people who are already smokers. So "There's radon in basements anyway so it doesn't hurt any more if I grind on a radioactive Summicron" is not a valid argument. Just use the Summicron (which I realize is a different lens from the OP's lens), but don't polish it.

Disclaimer: I am a physicist, but not a health physicist.
 

matreve

Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2013
Messages
5
Format
Multi Format
The first two groups are air-spaced doublets.

This is the front group with the fixture taken apart, elements separated, and spacer shown.




If you look closely at the diagram from Minolta in the link, you see a Black line for the two air-spaced doublets and a white line for the cemented rear doublet. You also will note that I bought one and took it apart.

The rendering of the Minolta lens is much closer to the Summitar than it is the Summicron. The Summicron used high index of refraction/ low dispersion glass. The original version uses Thoriated glass.

Minolta, wide-open. "Swirlies" like the Summitar.



"Lens Groups are defined as being cemented, air-spaced, and oil-spaced. The Minolta Chiyoko 5cm F2 is a 2-2-2-1: 7 element in 4 groups. The 1st and 2nd doublet are air-spaced groups, the doublet behind the aperture is cemented. Air-spaced doublets allow 4 radii to be used for better control of spherical aberration. As this lens was always coated, the designers apparently felt the extra degree of freedom was worth the extra air/glass interfaces. A second reason to use air-spaced (and oil spaced) groups is to accommodate different coefficients of expansion of glass elements used in the group."

As to the brochure you posted- note the heavy black lines for the two front doublets, and the thin line for the rear doublet. Minolta is showing the air-spacing between the elements, but 70 years later- unless you take one apart you will not know why they did this.

Minolta_Chiyoko_Collection by fiftyonepointsix, on Flickr

The more common 5cm F2 that uses 43mm filters shown in this picture.
I stand corrected. Ahhh...Minolta, always surprises me.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom