Camera Romance

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,133
Messages
2,786,776
Members
99,820
Latest member
Sara783210
Recent bookmarks
0

Jim Jones

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
3,740
Location
Chillicothe MO
Format
Multi Format
Did you start with the early Leica IIIs?

I'm just wondering if the move to the M-series was as big an evolution as it seems to me.

Did your photography get better?

The Leica IIIf bought new in 1953 was like a sports car; my current M4 is more like a SUV, practical rather than elegant.
 

markbarendt

Member
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
9,422
Location
Beaverton, OR
Format
Multi Format
Each to their own.

But I work quite the opposite. When a camera works really well for me, I forget it's there.

That means I am only thinking about the photo and operating the camera without any conscious thought about it.

I don't have any emotional relationships with objects, except maybe that I get frustrated if they break.

I know my cameras well enough to work them with little if any thought too. But objects do affect emotions.

For better or worse each camera has it's strengths and it's stereotypes in our worlds and those translate into how I relate to the world and how those around me relate to me.

In a sense picking a camera is like choosing which "friend" you want to spend the day with.

For example choosing an RB is for me a commitment to a more planned or formal "date" with a serious-minded city girl, where grabbing my Holga is more of partying by the lake with the girl from next door "date".

I'm not the only one that gets this either, the "girls" I hang with have a distinct affect on how the people around me act. Think Michelle Obama vs. P!nk. I'd happily spend separate afternoons with either, each afternoon would be a very different experience.
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
I feel this way about my Rolleiflex. In the beginning, I wasn't sure how I felt about it - did it work well with me, was the twin-lens thing a good idea or a bad idea? But after putting some film through it, and taking it out on 'dates', I got to know it and realized it was probably the best camera for me that I've ever owned (no slight to my large format stuff - they're the friends-with-benefits when I need some spice or want to do something I can't do with the Rollei). But it does just get out of the way and let me take the images I want to take. I would say it does love me back, because I get the best pictures from it.
 

Jaf-Photo

Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
495
Format
Medium Format
I know my cameras well enough to work them with little if any thought too. But objects do affect emotions.

For better or worse each camera has it's strengths and it's stereotypes in our worlds and those translate into how I relate to the world and how those around me relate to me.

In a sense picking a camera is like choosing which "friend" you want to spend the day with.

For example choosing an RB is for me a commitment to a more planned or formal "date" with a serious-minded city girl, where grabbing my Holga is more of partying by the lake with the girl from next door "date".

I'm not the only one that gets this either, the "girls" I hang with have a distinct affect on how the people around me act. Think Michelle Obama vs. P!nk. I'd happily spend separate afternoons with either, each afternoon would be a very different experience.


I think all my efforts to convince people that avid photographers aren't kooks just went out the window :wink:
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,708
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
I think all my efforts to convince people that avid photographers aren't kooks just went out the window :wink:

We are all perfectly normal. It's 'they' who are bananas. :whistling:
 

Jaf-Photo

Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
495
Format
Medium Format
We are all perfectly normal. It's 'they' who are bananas. :whistling:

Well, I had a friend at university who coined the phrase:

"I thought everyone else was nuts, until I realised it was me."

That was after they put him on Lithium. Great guy, though.

But more seriously, I think everyone who has an all-overriding interest should watch out little bit.

I've seen people get kooky over the silliest hobbies, such as stamp collecting, jogging, video games, hifi ... or photography.
 

markbarendt

Member
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
9,422
Location
Beaverton, OR
Format
Multi Format
I feel this way about my Rolleiflex. In the beginning, I wasn't sure how I felt about it - did it work well with me, was the twin-lens thing a good idea or a bad idea? But after putting some film through it, and taking it out on 'dates', I got to know it and realized it was probably the best camera for me that I've ever owned (no slight to my large format stuff - they're the friends-with-benefits when I need some spice or want to do something I can't do with the Rollei). But it does just get out of the way and let me take the images I want to take. I would say it does love me back, because I get the best pictures from it.

A TLR is on my bucket list.
 

JDW22

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2013
Messages
119
Location
Mesa, AZ
Format
4x5 Format
I'm the son of an retired pro shooter. I grew up watching my father use a variety of Linhof's, Hasselblad's, and Rollei's. For reasons I can't rationally explain, the Hasselblad's always were my favorite. Although I own more digital camera gear than I have a right to, my photography dreams always involved Hasselblad. A few months ago I finally purchased a 500CM and a couple of Zeiss lenses. The minute that chrome and black camera arrived at my home, it felt like I'd come full circle. I continue to enjoy my DSLR gear, but it doesn't come close to having mojo like that 500CM. There is something about Victor's design that just feels magical to me.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,194
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Is it a coincidence that there doesn't seem to be a single female member of APUG posting to this thread?
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,708
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
Is it a coincidence that there doesn't seem to be a single female member of APUG posting to this thread?

:laugh:

I think it's a total fluke.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
4,942
Location
Monroe, WA, USA
Format
Multi Format
Real Camera Romance??

From the days when cameras were cameras, men were men, and sheep were scared...

NewSpeeds.jpg


Just look at those faces.

:w00t:

Ken
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Markauf

Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2006
Messages
62
Location
Chicagoland
Format
Multi Format
Analog cameras are sexy machines! There's a sensuality to them when cradled in your hands. They're seductive with their burled knobs and finely crafted mechanisms as they whisper, snap and clap while you manipulate their controls. A digital camera seems to me to be otherwise, a lifeless drone, robotic and cold. Just my (perhaps strange) thoughts....
 

pstake

Subscriber
Joined
May 5, 2005
Messages
728
Format
Multi Format
A digital camera seems to me to be otherwise, a lifeless drone, robotic and cold. Just my (perhaps strange) thoughts....

I have this feeling about most autofocus SLRs, digital or not.
 

jovo

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2004
Messages
4,120
Location
Jacksonville
Format
Multi Format
In a human romance, there is always a degree of mystery and not all is ever fully revealed. As sincere and open a bond as one feels they have with their beloved, one can never truly know another's mind all the time. Chimping at the screen of a DSLR is mindreading. There's no mystery, no romance, no spark. It's all out there. As competent as I try to be with my film cameras, I never truly know what I've got until the film is dry and sitting on my lightpad. That frizzante quality keeps the love alive! I love my P67 even though I wish she would lose some weight, and not be so cranky when loading film. But, we're a pair...an item....a couple! :laugh:
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,411
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
You named your cameras and call them by their names? :confused:

Yes, the 503 CX is Victor, naturally.
The 903 SWC is Wide Willy because he is such a braggart.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
5,462
Location
.
Format
Digital
Nice to know that I'm not alone with names for cameras.
I have 'Pentaximus' the 67, 'Brutus' the EOS 1N, 'Ollie' the XA, 'Nil' for the ZeroImage pinhole and 'Nix' for the Nikon digi.
When I called out to myself in a café last week, 'where is 'Brutus'!?', the girl looked up at me: "you didn't bring a dog in here, did you?". "No! I'm referring to my camera.". :confused:
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,411
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Tessina Auto is Tessie.
Nikon N75 is Nick
Nikon F100 is Frank
WideLux 7 wants to be called Roving Eye.
Voitlander Vito II is Vinny
4"x5" Pacemaker Speed Graphic is "Speedy" as in Alka-Seltzer.
4"x5" Graflex Model D is Dov, meaning Bear.
Kodak Brownie Hawkeye has the cleaver original name Brownie.
 
OP
OP
RalphLambrecht

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,658
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
Analog cameras are sexy machines! There's a sensuality to them when cradled in your hands. They're seductive with their burled knobs and finely crafted mechanisms as they whisper, snap and clap while you manipulate their controls. A digital camera seems to me to be otherwise, a lifeless drone, robotic and cold. Just my (perhaps strange) thoughts....

nono,I think you hit the nail on the head.I'll go and hug one right now:D
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom