LOL, I actually have quite a flat belly at the moment due to training and eating judiciously. I mostly use my 80mm when out and about, but also have a 150mm and now in the market for a 50mm to complete the "holy trinity".
Calling All Hasselblad 500 c/m Owners
-
A
- Thread starter Hubigpielover
- Start date
Recent Classifieds
-
Want to Buy JOBO ATL 1500/1000 or JOBO CPP2
- Started by balazsfff
-
For Sale Foto-100 bulk roll, 100'
- Started by MCB18
-
Free Hasselblad ELM battery adapters x2
- Started by blee1996
-
For Sale Leica 14510 leather case for R-E, R4, R5, R6.
- Started by Chrismat
-
For Sale FS: A Pair of NORMAN Flash Tube Covers
- Started by AnselMortensen
Forum statistics
LOL, I actually have quite a flat belly at the moment due to training and eating judiciously. I mostly use my 80mm when out and about, but also have a 150mm and now in the market for a 50mm to complete the "holy trinity".
Agree on this. I recycled that same strap from my DSLR, just buying the appropriate attachments for the Hasselblad (they are not that expensive).
Here's the actual link, i typed it in cold earlier and forgot www, http://www.hasselbladhistorical.eu
Nothing wrong with the 60 for getting your feet wet, I have a 3 lens kit with 60, 80 and 150, if I had to ditch one, it would likely be the 80. As for 60 vs 80, the 80 is faster which can be nice, but the 60 is slightly sharper. If your vision likes wide, it would be a good way to start.
I use the Hasselblad straps, because I like the fastening clips on them better than the op tech, but the op techs are nice otherwise.
It's just another format you can shoot with the Hasselblad V series, same 120 roll film but 16 images to a roll in a rectangular format . . . 6x4.5. Like I said . . . some compositions work better in a rectangular vs square format. I like having the choice . . YMMV
Like this one . . .
https://www.photrio.com/forum/media/summer-stream-hillsborough-nh.58876/
I cannot agree more with this ^^^^^
MattKing
Moderator
IIRC, there are distinct differences between the 60mm and 80mm lenses when it comes to minimum focusing distance and length of focus "throw".
The Hasselblad users here will correct me if I am wrong.
But if I am right, if either of those characteristics matter to you, you may wish to factor them in to your choice(s).
Personally I tend to lean toward the 60mm focal length - my square format "standard" lens is a 65mm (Mamiya) lens.
The Hasselblad users here will correct me if I am wrong.
But if I am right, if either of those characteristics matter to you, you may wish to factor them in to your choice(s).
Personally I tend to lean toward the 60mm focal length - my square format "standard" lens is a 65mm (Mamiya) lens.
The 60mm lens is too close to the 80mm lens so I recommend the 50mm and 80mm or 50mm and 100mm lenses. I recommend:
I have a 503 CX and 903, not a 500 C/M.
38mm [SWC]. 50mm, 80mm, 150mm [or 180mm], 250mm or
38mm [SWC]. 50mm, 100mm, 150mm [or 180mm], 250mm
I own the 30mm [Fisheye]; 38mm [SWC]. 50mm, 80mm, 100mm,150mm, 250mm, 500mm and 3XE. I do not have the 120mm or 135mm because I would not use them enough for close up work. Instead I use fixed length extension tubes.38mm [SWC]. 50mm, 100mm, 150mm [or 180mm], 250mm
I have a 503 CX and 903, not a 500 C/M.
Consider getting a prism finder if you want to shoot (relatively) quickly and easily. I never got on very well with the WLF myself.
Also I agree if you think 80% of your shots will be of buildings you will find the 80mm a bit limiting FOV-wise. The 60mm or 50mm FLE may be a better option there, although they are slower. They are both optically better than the 80mm though. Also consider that the 80mm isn't really a very flattering focal length for close up shots of people (say, head and shoulders type shots); for that 120mm+ is more effective. The 120mm Makro and 180mm Sonnar are superlative portrait lenses.
Also I agree if you think 80% of your shots will be of buildings you will find the 80mm a bit limiting FOV-wise. The 60mm or 50mm FLE may be a better option there, although they are slower. They are both optically better than the 80mm though. Also consider that the 80mm isn't really a very flattering focal length for close up shots of people (say, head and shoulders type shots); for that 120mm+ is more effective. The 120mm Makro and 180mm Sonnar are superlative portrait lenses.
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 3,589
- Format
- Medium Format
Hasselblad lenses shorter than 60mm are huge hunks of glass. The beauty of the Hasselblad design is compactness and not being too heavy for using hand held. The 150mm, like the 80mm, is easy to hand hold. The 60mm is a nice compromise and makes a compact, easy to carry package. Lenses shorter than 60mm are heavy.
I use heavy 300mm Olympic Sonnar and 400mm Leitz and Kilfit lenses on tripod mounted 2000FCM, but that’s a completely different topic. If my 2000FCM outlasts me (fingers crossed) I doubt a longer Hasselblad lens is in my future.
I use heavy 300mm Olympic Sonnar and 400mm Leitz and Kilfit lenses on tripod mounted 2000FCM, but that’s a completely different topic. If my 2000FCM outlasts me (fingers crossed) I doubt a longer Hasselblad lens is in my future.
Autocords have 75mm lenses which are just slightly wider than the Zeiss 80mm. If you feel that you need something just a little wider then try a 60mm.
Used Zeiss lenses have stabilized in price. If you buy a lens and after trying it, decide that you don't want it, you can always sell and get most of your money back. Any little bit you lose just figure it as a cheap rental fee.
The 60mm is a marvelous and often overlooked lens. I advise many folks to consider the 100mm Planar and the 60mm Distagon. The 100mm is one of the standout Hasselblad choices, and the 60 is a nice all rounder. I even bought the Rollei version when I moved onto the Hy6.
After I got the swc, I concluded that the 50mm was rather useless, so I sold it and never regretted it. But I like wide angle and I like the convenience of having two camera’s instead of having to change lenses.
Regards,
Frank
For travel to Europe I use the 38mm [SWC], 50mm and 80mm lenses.
It's all relative. As soon as your kit grows beyond a Hassy with a single lens you have to accept the fact you'll be lugging some weight around, but it's still not so bad compared to some systems. I have absolutely no issue using the 50mm hand held either, and from what I understand the 40mm is only marginally heavier.
The 40mm lens has the advantage of being with shift and tilt with the FlexBody. On the other hand the 40mm lens is not rectilinearly correct like the SWC. I prefer the SWC.
The focal length range of the Hasselblad Rodenstock zoom lenses is very limited, so I never considered buying them. When I carry all my lenses, I consider it part of my physical fitness program. When I am traveling by air I take the SWC, 50mm lens and the 80mm [or 100mm] lens OR the 50mm lens, the 80mm [or 100mm] lens and the 250mm lens.
The focal length range of the Hasselblad Rodenstock zoom lenses is very limited, so I never considered buying them. When I carry all my lenses, I consider it part of my physical fitness program. When I am traveling by air I take the SWC, 50mm lens and the 80mm [or 100mm] lens OR the 50mm lens, the 80mm [or 100mm] lens and the 250mm lens.
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 3,589
- Format
- Medium Format
45-50 yrs ago I walked around with a gaggle of cameras and lenses. As time went by, I carried less and less. The Hasselblad system is so ingenious that it can be used as hand held compact kit as well as on a tripod for many different kinds of photography. In many ways a Hasselblad is the only real competition to a 35mm SLR in terms of versatility, with the advantage of a larger negative.
I've had a 500c/m for about 15 years, and haven't used it nearly enough. I've recently started using it much more often, and am happy to say that the love is back. What a great system!
I recently bought a copy of the Hasselblad Manual, 3rd Edition, which has all the information relevant to a 500c/m system at the right price point. Ideally, you should try to get a copy of the Revised Reprint 1989 that has an extra chapter covering new camera bodies, lenses, and accessories introduced between 1986 and 1989. TIP: Whatever edition of the book you purchase, make sure it has all of the color pages intact. The first copy I bought had all of the fashion/glamour photos surgically removed via an X-ACTO (or similar) knife, so I had to return it. Even if you don't typically do this type of photography, you paid for a complete book.
As for lenses and accessories:
I really recommend the 42170 Acute-Matte focusing screen with grid and split-image microprism. I shoot a lot of urban-scapes, and find the grid invaluable for keeping everything aligned when hand holding the camera. The only downside is this particular focusing screen currently sells for a lot more than I paid 10 years ago.
I think having two A12 backs is sufficient. I used to have three, but found that I really didn't need to carry three backs around. Loading a roll of film isn't a major time issue unless you're shooting a wedding.
As for wide-angle lenses, I can't say enough good things about the 50mm Distagon f/4 CF FLE. I use this lens much more often than my 80mm Planar CF. I absolutely love it. There's absolutely nothing wrong with the 80mm; the 50mm just suits my style better. Also, I now only use CF lenses. For me, the CF useability is preferable to the earlier C lenses. I don't find that the later CFi or CFE lenses offer any features that I need. I guess I'm a CF die-hard.
I recently bought a copy of the Hasselblad Manual, 3rd Edition, which has all the information relevant to a 500c/m system at the right price point. Ideally, you should try to get a copy of the Revised Reprint 1989 that has an extra chapter covering new camera bodies, lenses, and accessories introduced between 1986 and 1989. TIP: Whatever edition of the book you purchase, make sure it has all of the color pages intact. The first copy I bought had all of the fashion/glamour photos surgically removed via an X-ACTO (or similar) knife, so I had to return it. Even if you don't typically do this type of photography, you paid for a complete book.
As for lenses and accessories:
I really recommend the 42170 Acute-Matte focusing screen with grid and split-image microprism. I shoot a lot of urban-scapes, and find the grid invaluable for keeping everything aligned when hand holding the camera. The only downside is this particular focusing screen currently sells for a lot more than I paid 10 years ago.
I think having two A12 backs is sufficient. I used to have three, but found that I really didn't need to carry three backs around. Loading a roll of film isn't a major time issue unless you're shooting a wedding.
As for wide-angle lenses, I can't say enough good things about the 50mm Distagon f/4 CF FLE. I use this lens much more often than my 80mm Planar CF. I absolutely love it. There's absolutely nothing wrong with the 80mm; the 50mm just suits my style better. Also, I now only use CF lenses. For me, the CF useability is preferable to the earlier C lenses. I don't find that the later CFi or CFE lenses offer any features that I need. I guess I'm a CF die-hard.
only if the dark slide has Neil's name engraved to it.When I was a kid, I always thought the CM stood for COMMAND MODULE
Agreed, an Acute Matte D screen is a must IMO. They're so much brighter than a normal screen. I have the one with the etched grid and rangefinder patch, which makes focusing a breeze. They're very expensive, but worth every penny.
The CFi/CFE lenses do have an appreciably nicer focusing feel (probably the best of any lenses I've used). The shutters were also upgraded to have better longevity.
you can always crop in the darkroom to your liking.
I agree, even I can see the image snap, unbelievably sharp, when you dial in the floating element.
OP
OP
That seems like the normal kit for Hasselblads
Thanks
That strap looks comfortable. How hot is it? It seems everyone thinks the 5th edition is they way to go so I went ahead and ordered one. I think it will be money well spent.
When I was a kid, I always thought the CM stood for COMMAND MODULE
The Acute-Mate screen will probably be the last thing I get because, you are right, they are expensive. Still debating on a 50, 60, or 80. The camera came with a 80mm lens hood. so that would be one less thing I would have to buy. Rally wish I could try out lenses to see what I like the best.
Don't even want to talk about how dumb I was when I was a kid.
Down here in Australia we had the Mardi Gras in Sydney last week. It was a riot. I wouldn't (and didn't!) take a camera there for fear it would be smeared with lipstick, glitter, boa feathers and baubels! A smartphone is just fine, and that's what thousands and thousands were using. Actually, no time for any sort of photography -- too busy having a bloody good time in gold and glitter!!
Today I learned Sydney has Mardi Gras. Do y'all have a parade and floats? I don't mind bringing my camera out with me to stuff like that. I usually don't drink that much anymore because now that I am older than 40 hangovers last for a year. Mardi Gras is a great time and I usually always enjoy it.
Really appreciate all the tips. One reason why I like this site is because people like y'all take the time out to help people like me.
You bet we do! It's just what is needed to bring Sydney to an absolute standstill, and the crowds love it.
Many of the floats had been under construction for more than 8 months, and are works of art in their own right. They follow a specific theme each year.
I was in there... painted in lurid gold with that itsy-bitsy-teeny-weeny-chilli-red Speedo-kini. We finished off the night with a gin party. Perhaps too much gin...
Yes! And I sometimes do, but the 6x4.5 magazine also gives you 16 exposures, 4 more than the 6x6 magazine.
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:  |