mtjade2007
Member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2007
- Messages
- 679
- Format
- Medium Format
These rules or laws are killing the industry of photographic films in my opinion. Honestly if I can not legally process films myself I would abandon my hobby of photography all together. Processing is a significant part of the fun of photography to me. If I had to reply on a 3rd party person to control the creation of the images I can't imagine why I would enjoy it. I can understand the environmental protection these rules are for. But they should only apply to large quantity shipments but not to small packages for individual home use. It's funny that I can not mail a 1 lb box of C-41 developer to a friend 40 miles away. But I know for sure a chemical distributor in my town delivers hundreds and hundreds of lbs of photographic chemicals on a daily basis with a beat up van all over the city with no regulations. Why do we give so much of our tax money to feed so many government officials who set these rules to make our hobby so difficult to enjoy? I am sure Kodak's business in films and film chemicals have been severly damaged by these rules.
By the way while I agree that China is the country that is releasing the most toxic waste to the whole world I don't think Taiwan and Malaysia should be included. India is more likely the next in line. Just look at the number of factories built in China by all industrialized countries around the world. Taiwan and Malaysia are too small to build enough number of factories to pollute the world.
By the way while I agree that China is the country that is releasing the most toxic waste to the whole world I don't think Taiwan and Malaysia should be included. India is more likely the next in line. Just look at the number of factories built in China by all industrialized countries around the world. Taiwan and Malaysia are too small to build enough number of factories to pollute the world.