- Joined
- Mar 4, 2011
- Messages
- 513
- Format
- 35mm
I would like to know of a lab on what machines they scan, at what resolutions, what delivery methods, and prices. From the ads some do this at a single price which is really cool.
I can do without scantalk in order to get all the wonderful analog info.
Monito - It used to be called Hybrid Photo. It got renamed because, as I understand, it was part of the revamping to make it a more lively site.
Monito - It used to be called Hybrid Photo. It got renamed because, as I understand, it was part of the revamping to make it a more lively site.
The reason it becomes contentious is because APUG tries to put a Berlin Wall around such discussions instead of owning outright the scanning issue as a sub-forum as has been suggested already.
I don't think anyone but APUG users refer to it as hybrid. It's a term I've never heard a pro lab use and not even lomo types use it.
Actually Dr Edwin Land coined the phrase hybrid in photographic terms way bay in the 1980's, and the term has been in use ever since.
He foresaw the Ditital/Analogue interface, images being shot either way and being output by another A/D or D/A, or even shot one way and part of the process the other, A/D/A. A/A/D. D/A/D.
Perhaps in some ways because Digital minilabs became the norm by the aerly 2000's some customers don't realise they are hybrid. So in selling minilabs machines the terminology is important but to a labs customers all that matters is the actual prints/scans etc.
The term Hybrid is now more likely to be used when someone has to make a conscious decision whether to use a fully analog or hybrid route for alternative processing. Or perhaps decide whether to optically print colour negative or use a Lambada machine (or minilab) which is essentially the A/D/A route.
The real issue here on APUG is when photographers themselves use a digital stage to re-interpret images, that tips the balance from Analog to Digital. That's quite different to using a commecial lab to process and scan negatives and make normal commercial prints.
We all need to provide scans of our images either for Internet use on sites like this, publication etc and a FAQ section on how best to go about this would be ideal. and as Tim says with links to more resurces online.
Actually Dr Edwin Land coined the phrase hybrid in photographic terms way bay in the 1980's, and the term has been in use ever since.
He foresaw the Ditital/Analogue interface, images being shot either way and being output by another A/D or D/A, or even shot one way and part of the process the other, A/D/A. A/A/D. D/A/D.
Perhaps in some ways because Digital minilabs became the norm by the aerly 2000's some customers don't realise they are hybrid. So in selling minilabs machines the terminology is important but to a labs customers all that matters is the actual prints/scans etc.
The term Hybrid is now more likely to be used when someone has to make a conscious decision whether to use a fully analog or hybrid route for alternative processing. Or perhaps decide whether to optically print colour negative or use a Lambada machine (or minilab) which is essentially the A/D/A route.
The real issue here on APUG is when photographers themselves use a digital stage to re-interpret images, that tips the balance from Analog to Digital. That's quite different to using a commecial lab to process and scan negatives and make normal commercial prints.
We all need to provide scans of our images either for Internet use on sites like this, publication etc and a FAQ section on how best to go about this would be ideal. and as Tim says with links to more resurces online.
It's the process and practice of analog capture that makes this site unique--always will so long as film and chemistry are available.
APUG.ORG is an international community of like minded individuals devoted to traditional (non-digital) photographic processes.
If a lab user has no choice but go the A/D/A route, it makes no sense to have the middle part of that discussion shunted to the DPUG wasteland (less than 10 posts/day).
It's the rigidity and orthodoxy that does APUG no favors, along with the continuous and comprehensive anti-digital fatwas. What's next, sworn statements that we don't own or use digital equipment as a condition of participation?
Looks to me that the genie is finally free of the bottle. I think it's time for a reconsideration. Hopefully, a reassessment will lead to a separate forum on scanning issues integral with the APUG site. It's the process and practice of analog capture that makes this site unique--always will so long as film and chemistry are available.
With regard to lab work there is little if any reason for discussion of the internal details. It has no more value than gossip, may be fun to hear but it has no bearing on what gets done.
To be blunt when you or I are paying the lab to develop, print, and scan, we have made a choice not to need to know the details and not to spend the time doing the work ourselves.
IMO what is important when using a lab is if they will listen to you, if they are affordable, and if they do good work.
The only good reason I can see for knowing the internal details is if you want to manipulate those details.
Given that every lab is different, only the labs can answer those questions.
If you want to set up scanning at the house well we're back to lynda.com and photoshopuser.com as better sources for getting the info.
APUG.ORG is an international community of like minded individuals devoted to traditional (non-digital) photographic processes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?