KerrKid
Member
The Nikon 28Ti is one such candidate.
Wait....$900+ camera? That’s just a wee bit out of my budget to say the least.
The Nikon 28Ti is one such candidate.
I kind of want one of these every time I see them.
Love needle meters, love weird stuff like that, they're very 1990 Japanese... I have too many cameras for a spendy point and shoot, but the at price they were two years ago when I was only thinking about getting back to film and didn't have a box full of cameras I wouldn't regret it. 35mm is a great walkin' around focal length for me and they're tiny enough to stuff in a pocket.
I think OP should get one. Or two, one for a shooter, the second for a backup.
If the op spends a little time here, they'll see that buyer's remorse and complaining about something that isn't what we wanted once we got it is all we do!
Here's an example. I bought a nice, old classic lens for my Pentax, and the adapter didn't work. Turns out the lens is a T mount (which I have never held in my hands before now), not M42. So I took it to Monument Camera here in Tucson, and he had a T adapter that fixed the issue.
Meanwhile, I had found essentially the same lens in Nikon mount, so I had bought that, but I'm selling the only Nikon camera I have. If the lens arrives and the camera sells, I have to buy another Nikon body.
This all messed up my adapter idea for a Canon AV-1 that's coming, as I had bought an FD to M42 adapter, and it turned out I don't actually have a M42 lens. There's more, it's not fun to type :[
Good news! If you stay in this game long enough, things come around. Today, a Leica 58mm UVa filter in a nice case shows up in my mailbox, right out of the blue. But I didn't buy it. It has my name on the shipping envelope, but the sender is in a state I've never been to, and I don't recognize their name.
I checked my eBay purchases thinking that maybe a seller got their shipments mixed up, but the items that haven't arrived still show as "not delivered".
I see these on eBay for $130, If I don't hear from anyone in a week or two, I guess it's mine. It sounds wrong to to blindly send an expensive item to a stranger's address until I know that's where it's actually supposed to go, and googling the shippers name went nowhere. Weird, but I'm not complaining.
Send a PM to Sean with the Seller's name and ask if he can check to see if the seller is on Photrio and would reach out to them for you.
Lets see,.....the RB67, RZ67 and the Bronica 645. Three of the worst cameras I ever owned and will never own them again.
Thanks, Matt. I received the camera today. It is in absolute mint shape. We'll see how the pictures turn out.
It is the same width as my Yashica T4 but a bit thicker. Not bad.
The shutter release travel is fairly long and does not release crisply. That's a nitpick. It's just something to adjust to.
The controls are intuitive and shaped and positioned well. The viewfinder is big and clear.
Overall, it's a very attractive camera and I'm happy with it. Yes, I wish I could have gotten it cheaper, but it's still a very good value at $50.
My comment was directed to the post immediately preceding mine from momus, who received an unexpected filter and can't figure out why it came to him. But I'm glad your purchase worked out.
Wow, I loved my RB67 (had three of them), wanted to get a RZ...
And now i own three Bronica 6x4.5 cameras (ETRSi and ETRS) which I totally love and essentially are like a scaled-down RZ67...
What was wrong with those cameras??
RB and the RZ were too big and clunky, and the bronica never worked right, that awful trigger handle was the worst. I've owned the Pentax 645Nii for 3 years now and will never give it up.
Well i can't fault this reasoning, RB/RZ are indeed very big. And the trigger handle on the bronica... I like it but of course i'd expect the Pentax integrated grip to be better.
This also means you don't miss fast flash sync speeds...
That Analog Display is the reason I bought a Contax T3. Although the Nikon has a certain cool charm, I didn’t think it would be practical in the field.Well then maybe the 35Ti would be more cost effective. That Nikon Analog Display System looks so cool!
I got an Oleson bright screen for my ETRSi. People seem to rave about these, and it is a touch brighter which is nice, but it's really badly made. When you look though the rangefinder the edges are rough enough that there's a black line around them, making it harder to get precise focus.
Also, the whole dymo tape to make it fit thing is cheesy. If it's a $40-50 item maybe, but these are a hundred bucks a pop, I'd expect it to fit. I'm still not sure it's the right height, to the point I'm planning on a roll of focus testing to figure it out.
Maybe I should have gotten the non rangefinder version. The mosaic works better than the stock screen. But I still wonder if I should have just sent it back and lived with the stock screen.
This is the one thread I always come back to (hangs head down in shame after buying TWO cameras last night on eBay that work only with the lens that was just sold).
(head goes back up): But I got such a great deal on them!
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |