Another option might be to remove it with retouching the print. It depends on the size of the highlight and its surroundings. I've "removed" a bright lamp post in a night shot that way. The surrounding area was very dark in my case so all I had to do was fill up the bright spot with black spotting dye.
Nathan
this calls for a slight pre paper flash, and then burn in with the grade 5 to darken any darker areas in the highlight.
Calls for a second light source or enlarger, and basically you do a test strip of flash with image over top.. at a certain point you will reach the threshold that works besf for you.
leave the neg in the enlarger.
The highlight in question is a piece of sky. There is no detail to recover in the negative, I simply want this small area to print very slightly darker than paper white to mitigate distraction. I will try the flashing technique this weekend, but I'm quite intimidated as it seems complicated.
This is exactly why I love this forum. There is so much knowledge here!
The highlight in question is a piece of sky. There is no detail to recover in the negative, I simply want this small area to print very slightly darker than paper white to mitigate distraction. I will try the flashing technique this weekend, but I'm quite intimidated as it seems complicated.
This is exactly why I love this forum. There is so much knowledge here!
use penlight
I have a negative with a small distracting highlight near the edge that I am trying to burn down slightly. The spot on the negative is at full density and prints paper white. No matter how long I burn the spot it does not darken (5+ stops of burning). I'm assuming this means absolutely no light is making it through the negative. I tried removing the negative for the burn, but that is extremely difficult to control as a large amount of light is projected even at the smallest aperture. How does everybody here solve this issue?
I'm a decent printer but have never come across a highlight that absolutely refuses to burn!
Hi Nathan,
the method that I described is very easy to do - no need to be intimidated.
All you are really doing is slightly fogging the area where the highlight is to take it away from pure paper base. This is exactly the same as any other area that you might burn in - only difference is that you are adding a grey tone rather than detail a per normal burning in.
Once you give it a try, I am sure you will get the hang of it very quickly - and pre-flashing is a very useful technique to have in your toolkit.
Bests,
David.
www.dsallen.de
Hi Nathan
I use a very similar method to David and works a treat. I use a larger sheet of diffuse perspex (about 30cm square) held between the paper and lens so can either give a complete flash or with a card flash in edges or very hot spots. best thing is no need to take the neg out or move the enlarger. I normally do it all as a post flash but works the same pre or post. As David says, very easy to get the hang of it. I was teaching this one time and a student suggested using a paper cup under the lens. Could work.
I've used Drew's technique only with the diffuser below the large piece of cardboard and a white or light gray piece of paper on top.The hole is through the white paper and cardboard.With the large piece of cardboard covering the whole printing area,it can be closer to the print paper and you can see the image on the white paper on top allowing accurate location of the hole.It can be moved around to help with softening the outline if needed and in this case registration wouldn't be necessary.
Good luck...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?