Looks well made Chris, although I must confess I saw the thread title and initially mistook it for a "For Sale" listing!
Others who have gone through a similar process may have some advice about useful refinements.
Be cautious about your eyes.
You want them as close together as you can get. There's no such thing as too much light in an alt process exposure unit! Don't hesitate to purchase some more leds and put them in. Looks like you can gain around one stop more light on this unit if you put the strips side by side.until I figure out the exact width they need to be.
That looks quite decent, but 45 minutes is pretty long. I think I get about 6 minutes with a bank of uv tubes, but I haven't done cyanotypes lately.
UV-C is germicidal, 100 to 280nm, if your light is 385 to 400nm I don't know if it will do much. Your light is in the UV-A range, UV-C around 260 or 264nm is the best.
https://ultraviolet.com/what-is-germicidal-ultraviolet/
You can always look for some led strips with higher power leds and interleave those with your current ones. Similar output levels as tubes can easily be had with leds these days, so there's a realistic upgrade path.a bank of tubes and fixtures were about three times the price I paid to build this, which is why I chose the LED strips. I’ll use these for a while and if I find the exposure time to be too long I’ll look into something more powerful. The silver lining is that I can print, read, and have coffee all at the same time!
Why would you want those shorter wavelengths? Firstly, there are the health implications; while UVA is relatively benign, UVB and especially UVC should NOT be used without thorough shielding of the user. Secondly, most alt processes have their peak efficiency at around 350nm: https://sandykingphotography.com/resources/technical-writing/uv-light-sources-for-printingUV-C is germicidal, 100 to 280nm, if your light is 385 to 400nm I don't know if it will do much. Your light is in the UV-A range, UV-C around 260 or 264nm is the best.
https://ultraviolet.com/what-is-germicidal-ultraviolet/
I had the same concern, but lately there have been reports of people having used these for a year or longer without noticing a reduction in light output. So there seems to be hope although nothing lasts forever.One of the problems with LED's, and especially UV LED's, is they tend to wear out over time. As they age, they'll produce less and less light
I had the same concern, but lately there have been reports of people having used these for a year or longer without noticing a reduction in light output. So there seems to be hope although nothing lasts forever.
Try 2 minutes, 4 minutes, 8 minutes, 11 minutes, 16 minutes, 22 minutes, 32 minutesWell... 45 min exposure may be too much. I just did another print, this time with the new chartthrob curve, and a less contrasty portrait, and at 45 mins it’s nearly completely dark. I’m redoing it now with 10 minute increments.
No alt process needs UVC -- thank goodness. Most are highly sensitive to UVB, but is also hazoudous to work with. The glass of the contact printing frame would block 95% of the UVB and I believe all of the UVC. So we typically use UVA, with some variations in the processes as to sensitivity and wavelength.UV-C is germicidal, 100 to 280nm, if your light is 385 to 400nm I don't know if it will do much. Your light is in the UV-A range, UV-C around 260 or 264nm is the best.
https://ultraviolet.com/what-is-germicidal-ultraviolet/
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?