barryjyoung
Member
I do see your point, that some manufacturers may want to remain proprietary (Lotus?), but frankly, one reason I chose not to go with Lotus was that it limited me. I would not have chosen Wisner for the same reason (a wise decision in retrospect).
Regarding users' needs, a cheaper, one size fits all holder might be desirable, given that there are already enough exquisite pieces of equipment to purchase in the ULF world. There will always be a market for Sandy's holders for the reason you describe. I, for one, want a camera that will accept them, as they appear to be emerging as the new standard.
I am a film holder manufacturer, just starting out full time last week. The first holder rails are coming off the CNC machine this afternoon. I am complying with the standards put forth by Sandy King.