Brooklyn Beckam

[cliveh]

What do you make of this: -

 

[mshchem]

Not wasting time on video either

 

[koraks]

Going by the first minute, it's 15 minutes of someone complaining that someone else made a book they didn't find worthwhile and that's supposed to sell (my guess) on the Beckham name alone.

What I make of it? Haters gonna hate, that's all. I couldn't care less either way.

Not wasting time on video either

Indeed; not going to watch the remaining 14 mins.

 

[Jarno]

Someone mentioned the book in another video, and showed some pictures, really laughable, didn't even succeed in getting an elephant completely in the shot, I mean you could watch a video like that for a laugh (as long as there's not too much moaning about Beckham being a nepo baby, we get it). But yeah, don't expect to glean any important insights from a video like that.
I mean, sure it's a photo:

And no, elephants for sure are not hard to photograph, here's a snapshot that my wife did, simple cheap second hand camera, decidedly not a wannabe photographer:

 

[Don_ih]

The Guardian article is pretty funny.

Frankly, the publishers sucked up to him to get something that would easily make them money. Even that people complain about the photos is due to his parents' fame. If he was unknown, no one would care that his photos aren't great, even if they were published in a coffee-table book. No one would notice.