Bronica 110mm 4.0 Macro Lens Question

A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
img746.jpg

img746.jpg

  • 2
  • 0
  • 17
No Hall

No Hall

  • 0
  • 0
  • 23
Brentwood Kebab!

A
Brentwood Kebab!

  • 1
  • 1
  • 95
Summer Lady

A
Summer Lady

  • 2
  • 1
  • 124

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,784
Messages
2,780,808
Members
99,703
Latest member
heartlesstwyla
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Aug 18, 2016
Messages
22
Location
Staunton Virginia
Format
35mm RF
On a fluke I just bought a Bronco 110 for my SQ-A. Hasn't arrived yet, but in trying to find out info on it I come up empty. Like I said, on a fluke. The price was right and I decided to take a gamble. I've used Bronica SQ-A systems for years and have been more than pleased with the results from this system. What I'm looking for here is any feedback from people who have actually used this lens and their actual experience with this lens. It was listed as a 4.0, not a 4.5, so we'll see.
 

abruzzi

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2018
Messages
3,058
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
Large Format
I don't have an SQ system, but I expect that it is very similar, maybe even optically identical, to the GS-1, 110mm ƒ4 macro lens. I use that as the normal on my GS-1 and have been very pleased with it, but I'm not a lens snob.

As I understand it, the ƒ4.5 lens goes to 1:1 whereas the ƒ4 lens only goes to 1:4 on its own, and needs an extension tube to get to 1:1.
 

hirudin

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
74
Format
8x10 Format
I had the GS-1 with the 110mm macro for several years, a great lens! I even used with an extension tube to photograph subjects less than 1cm full frame and it was razor sharp on enlargement. I sadly had to sell my GS-1 system to pay some bills, but as soon as I can I'll be getting another.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,894
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
For the OP's sake, I hope it isn't actually the 110mm macro for the GS-1.
Of course, that might give him the excuse to buy another camera :D:whistling:.
 

DWThomas

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
4,604
Location
SE Pennsylvania
Format
Multi Format
I have the f/4.5 1:1 version for my SQ-A and I find it a very satisfying hunk of metal and glass. It seems fine for long normal/short telephoto use as well as macro. I believe abruzzi is correct about the 4:1 for f/4 vs 1:1 for f/4.5 magnification. The earlier 'S' series lenses offered a 105mm f/3.5, but I've no experience with that either. In general the PS lenses are excellent and later production so the shutters will be newer, a good thing.

The f/4 has fewer elements so with that and a reduced range for the focusing mechanics it is lighter to cart around (685g vs 940g).. The weight of the f/4.5 1:1 is certainly not trivial, but I tend toward tripod use so weight is not a big deal. (Hey -- I save gym membership! :whistling: )

Have fun with it!
 
OP
OP
Joined
Aug 18, 2016
Messages
22
Location
Staunton Virginia
Format
35mm RF
Thanks for all the replies. It should arrive this afternoon, so I'll know for sure whether I bought the 4.0 or the 4.5. If it's the 4.5 I'll renew my gym membership.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom