Gene_Laughter
Member
D.R. Peretti Griva ROMA 91 Bromoil Transfers Folio 1949
ebay Item number: 280235958900
The above folio of "bromoil transfers" is on ebay. I am having a friendly debate with the seller. He contends that these are original bromoil transfers. I argue that they are high quality reproductions.
My reasoning:
1. There are 91 images and the edition size was 1,000. To me, for Griva to hand ink 91,000 matrices for transfer and to tranfer the images onto paper using a hand "etching type" press is unrealistic. A little math: say the artist worked on transferring these images 40 hours each week. Let's say he's super fast, taking 15 minutes for soaking and inking each matrix for transfer. That's 22,500 hours of making transfers - or over 10 years with a 40 hour work week!
2. We know that the matrix will blister after a certain amount of transfers and at some point it becomes unusable. How many matices would have to be made of the same image to transfer a thousand copies of one image? Too many in my opinion!
3. I have a folio of 54 "transfers" by this same artist - Griva, dated 1954. The prints are beautiful. There is a sunken plate mark on each, but they are all too perfect. The paper is fairly lightweight, maybe 60 lb. If this paper were subjected to running through a press sandwiched with a damp matrix, I contend the paper would not be perfectly flat as all pages are. There would be traces and clues of imperfection, IMO.
I have examined the images with a loupe. There are no halftone dots, an argument used by those who say these are original transfers. I feel that they were transferred onto a lithographic stone or plate and then reproduced. Or, perhaps collotype?
Other pages from this folio / book have been auction on ebay recently and they too have been described as "original bromoil transfers." Some of the individual pages from Griva's book have brought in the $275 range at auction on ebay!
Does anyone here know how the Italian bromoilist, D.R. Peretti Griva, reproduced his bromoils for books with edition sizes of appriximately 1,000?
Puzzled,
:confused:
Gene
ebay Item number: 280235958900
The above folio of "bromoil transfers" is on ebay. I am having a friendly debate with the seller. He contends that these are original bromoil transfers. I argue that they are high quality reproductions.
My reasoning:
1. There are 91 images and the edition size was 1,000. To me, for Griva to hand ink 91,000 matrices for transfer and to tranfer the images onto paper using a hand "etching type" press is unrealistic. A little math: say the artist worked on transferring these images 40 hours each week. Let's say he's super fast, taking 15 minutes for soaking and inking each matrix for transfer. That's 22,500 hours of making transfers - or over 10 years with a 40 hour work week!
2. We know that the matrix will blister after a certain amount of transfers and at some point it becomes unusable. How many matices would have to be made of the same image to transfer a thousand copies of one image? Too many in my opinion!
3. I have a folio of 54 "transfers" by this same artist - Griva, dated 1954. The prints are beautiful. There is a sunken plate mark on each, but they are all too perfect. The paper is fairly lightweight, maybe 60 lb. If this paper were subjected to running through a press sandwiched with a damp matrix, I contend the paper would not be perfectly flat as all pages are. There would be traces and clues of imperfection, IMO.
I have examined the images with a loupe. There are no halftone dots, an argument used by those who say these are original transfers. I feel that they were transferred onto a lithographic stone or plate and then reproduced. Or, perhaps collotype?
Other pages from this folio / book have been auction on ebay recently and they too have been described as "original bromoil transfers." Some of the individual pages from Griva's book have brought in the $275 range at auction on ebay!
Does anyone here know how the Italian bromoilist, D.R. Peretti Griva, reproduced his bromoils for books with edition sizes of appriximately 1,000?
Puzzled,
:confused:
Gene
Last edited by a moderator: