I realize that the 612 is wider than the Veriwide 100, but otherwise why not? I also note that with lens it is far out of range for people like me, but then so is a Veriwide in good order.
Have you looked into the ProPaq line of modified Graflex XLs as sold by SKGrimes? Again, not quite Veriwides but in the spirit. I've suggested to Adam that he should be able to beat Alpa handily on price but he hasn't taken the hint.
And, come to think of it, I see that Capaul & Weber are now offering a modified Linhof Super-Rollex back that gives 56 x 84. They want silly money for it, also for the camera bodies that accept it, but an Alpa 12 with slightly long nominal 6x9 back and a short lens is in the spirit too.
About the suggestion above that a Graflex SLR be revived, Ron Wisner tried. IIRC, his well-made wooden box got good reviews but sold very poorly.
A subtext of this thread is that the new alternative to clapped-out old cameras should be relatively inexpensive. But many of the clapped-out cameras nominated for modern replacements were pretty expensive when new.
Cheers,
Dan
Mamiya 6
According to his web page, the first run sold out and more are being produced.
http://www.wisner.com/freedom.htm
In other words, you wants what you wants and thats what you wants, no substitutes accepted.When I first looked at the veriwide it was going for 600-800.00 w/ finder on ebay. Then they started to rise and I was informed that the lens wasn't suitable @ f/8 which is where I'd want to use it. I do like the integration of film /w body over the Paq Pro and like the Fotoman, but I feel the veriwide is more ergonomic. One day I'll either get over my desire for a hand holdable sw 6x9 or I'll buy whats available (old fuji RF?). Nice list of cameras though and I wasnt familiar with the paqpro until I read your post.
Allan, I have a Selfix 820 with 105/3.8 Xpres (not Express). If that's your idea of perfection, I fear you've been deprived of the better things ... I thought austerity in the UK ended long ago.Rolleiflex 3.5F Planar, Ensign Selfix w, Ross Express lens (if you,re old enough to remember) and without doubt the finest 35mm SLR system ever produced, the Olympus OM-1/2/3/4 - bet the OM-5 could have accepted digital backs and made toast and coffee!
In other words, you wants what you wants and thats what you wants, no substitutes accepted.
Cheers,
Dan
About the suggestion above that a Graflex SLR be revived, Ron Wisner tried. IIRC, his well-made wooden box got good reviews but sold very poorly.
Cheers,
Dan
How about a new Diana camera? 35mm model and 120. Panoramic Diana
New Zuiko lenses would be nice but then I couldn't afford them anyway and wouldn't bother buying em if I could
Who will decide and how soon will the winner be announced? I want that Rollei 66?
Simple, affordable ULF tailboard cameras.
that's a funny statement on several levels.
the Dianas arethe lenses! so changing them doesn't make any sense...
and a "new Diana" is here! Called Diana+ from Lomo...
I bought the Golden one (SO ugly!!) and I am quite dissapointed with it..
I don't know, but it certainly looks like they made another Holga, but disguised it as a Diana... in other words, the lens doesn't have the Diana characteristica!
But is it ok for the Students to try out.
(they added a pinhole feature in it - which is silly -and a screw thingy for tripod - which is nice!)
look here:
http://shop.lomography.com/shop/main.php?cat=&pro=dia
I didn't mean put a Zuiko lens on the Diana. Ha. I just meant a new Diana and some new Zuiko OM's ..for the future ebay when their prices aren't so steep so that I can replace/add to the ones I have now
CV did make SLR lenses in OM mount, now discontinued and mostly sold out, but no particular emphasis on speed. See http://www.cameraquest.com/Voigt SL.htm
The same facility is now making the Zeiss ZF/ZS SLR lenses.
Lee
Barry, save your small monetary units and someday you'll be able to get a 110/2 Planar.
Wot? Don't you have a wheelbarrow?That many nickels would weigh a lot.
Wot? Don't you have a wheelbarrow?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?