in the early nineties, as a very poor student, I had a love-hate relationship with the F90x, I saw it in a professional shop window in the town where I lived.
Love because it clearly was a special tool, as anyone obviously could see. And very high-tech. Not high tech like with all kinds of peeping-like features and on paper fabulous specifications, but true high tech features that anyone ever holding and using a camera really would use for the benefit of his photographs.
Hate because I couldn't buy it, it was many dimensions away from my budget.
So obvious thoughts of someone who can't afford: "what sucker needs such a camera to make good photographs". And "it's a shop window camera, but too expensive to really use", "people who can buy one take them to bed, instead of into the field".
Nevertheless I decided that I could really use one, one day...
Nowadays a F90x is regarded as dated, and surpassed technology, even in analogue terms.
I got 4 brand new of them by now, thanks to digital.
That's because I miss the ability to change films in between a roll efficiently (I am not a three digit number a week shooter, because I develop etc them all myself).
There are so many of them because they kept making them in large numbers even when "it was already over".
And I have 2 MB-10 and 1 MF-26. But I do not need these accessories in my style of shooting anyway. Allthough "focus priority" on MF-26 is sometimes useful to me. The F90x is perfect in exposure, when I'm lazy, when I shoot expensive E6 or any kind of flash.
I cannot say how much I love using the F90x. It is what I need, whether unpersuable in the past, or outdated at present.
The use of the F90x feels so natural to me, I KNOW that camera and the line of AF-D's.
My dream machine for ever.
The four I keep in "unprofessional", brand new Nikon Snout bags. But they are of the toughest and finest leather and they fit my shooting and carrying style.