Lee L
Member
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2004
- Messages
- 3,281
- Format
- Multi Format
Hair is better then a chrome dome.
That's the typical sequence.

Hair is better then a chrome dome.
Think again, the Nikon F,F2, and Nikkormat came in chrome too, in the UK black Nikon bodys cost £10 more.I've always prefoerred the black, though I own both. My favorite is a Black Nikkormat EL. There must be a reason that starting with the F3 I think all "pro" Nikons are black.
I agree with that.I did not vote because I have both, I use both, and I love both.
When I worry about wear and tear effecting the appearance of the camera, I prefer a chrome body.
When I am shooting candids and need to be inconspicuous, I prefer a black camera body.
When I am shooting a subject through glass and worry about the camera's reflection appearing in the glass, I prefer a black body.
One black body 35mm I always wish I owned was the Leica MP.
One 35mm chrome body that I always thought was attractive was the Olympus OM-1.
Black has always been my preference.
All my Canon's (A1, AE1-Program, F1) have been black; my EOS system followed suit - although it doesn't actually come in any other colour, so I'd be stuck if I really loved chrome!
There is the whole debate over which is better as far as reflecting heat(chrome) vs attracting and holding heat(black) and is it myth or fact. I remember reading an article about that back in the 80's as to why most camera manufacturers went to all black. It is purely a marketing ploy, and cheaper to make an all black unit, and label it a"professional" model. I believe this was due to the popularity of the Nikon F series, and not everybody could afford one, plus it gave the illusion your camera was just as good as the Nikon.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |