better use distilled water?

Sonatas XII-50 (Life)

A
Sonatas XII-50 (Life)

  • 1
  • 1
  • 1K
Tower and Moon

A
Tower and Moon

  • 3
  • 0
  • 2K
Light at Paul's House

A
Light at Paul's House

  • 3
  • 2
  • 2K
Slowly Shifting

Slowly Shifting

  • 0
  • 0
  • 2K
Waiting

Waiting

  • 1
  • 0
  • 2K

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,732
Messages
2,795,773
Members
100,013
Latest member
jkfromsk
Recent bookmarks
0

bonk

Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
214
Format
Med. Format Pan
Is there any advantage (or even disadvantage) in using distilled water for mixing a) developer b)stop bath c) fixer or d)wetting agent? I can always get as much as I want for free, so I thought maybe its a good idea since the water is really clean. :smile:
 

abudhabiandy

Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2007
Messages
30
Location
Abu Dhabi UA
Format
35mm
Hi, I always use tap water for dev, stop & fix but have found distilled water to be 100% better for wetting agent -in fact my negs hve been 100% clean since doing this about a yer ago.
 

fschifano

Member
Joined
May 12, 2003
Messages
3,196
Location
Valley Strea
Format
Multi Format
Is your tap water fit to drink? If you let a container of tap water sit for a few hours, do you find sediment on the bottom? If you can answer yes to the first question and no to the second, then your tap water is perfectly fine for photographic use.
 

Neal

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 3, 2004
Messages
2,020
Location
Chicago, West Suburbs
Format
Multi Format
Hi Bonk,

The advantage is you will know what you've got. Many (most?) have no problems using tap water but I consider it cheap insurance. I use it for everything but wash water (I use distilled for the final rinse with wetting agent as well).

Neal Wydra
 

PHOTOTONE

Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
2,412
Location
Van Buren, A
Format
Large Format
Commercial photo chemicals (either powders such as D-76, or liquid concentrates) have components in them to allow them to work fine with a wide variety of water. If you are mixing up "custom" chemicals from individual components then distilled water is best.
 

Murray Kelly

Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2007
Messages
661
Location
Brisbane, Australia
Format
Sub 35mm
The de-ionisedwater at all motor suppliers is by far the best insurance against local water incompatibility problems with developer mixes. After that, tap water is 'probably ' fine.

I have had troubles with wash water here - it is terribly hard and I have had to add Calgon to avoid unusual effects.

Murray Kelly
 

Monophoto

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
1,689
Location
Saratoga Spr
Format
Multi Format
I strongly advocate use of distilled (or RO filtered) water for mixing PhotoFlo for the final rinse. Pure water results in clean negatives.

I also keep a supply of distilled water for use in diluting chemicals for Pt/Pd printing. The chemicals are so expensive that I want to make sure there is no chance of contamination based on water quality.

But for the other chemicals, ordinary tap water is fine.
 

lawrenceimpey

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2005
Messages
73
Location
London, Engl
Format
35mm RF
I have been experimenting with distilled water and filtered tap water for the final rinse (with wash-aid). Strangely, I've had more problems with the distilled water than with the filtered water. Not sure if this is because the previous steps were in filtered water (in a hard water area) but I'm not bothering with distilled water any more.
 

tac

Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2007
Messages
245
Location
Appalachia
Format
Medium Format
I have two darkrooms that I use on a regular basis, one in the central Appalachians, and the other in Manhattan. I have always mixed D76 from tap water at both. Early on, I discovered that I needed to use drastically different development times for each location, for identical film (mostly Tri-x and TMY), exposed with the same meters and cameras.

After eliminating all other variables that I could (e.g., using two Kodak Process thermometers, calibrated together, using fresh d76 from same batch), I was forced to conclude that the pH and mineral content of the two water sources was the culprit.

With adjustment, I can create identical negatives at either location, but the difference is about 2 minutes +/- development time.

I assume that distilled for mixing developer would be standard everywhere and thus eliminate this situation, but I never bothered, just used the time adjustment.

I do, however, use distilled for final rinse in wetting agent, and for the critical parts of alternative processes. I think that if I had free access to unlimited distilled, I would use it for almost everything.
Good Luck and Have Fun!
 

Snapshot

Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
913
Location
Toronto, Ont
Format
Multi Format
I've switched to distilled water for making photographic solutions, especially developers. I've had issues with regards to calcium carbonate deposits forming in certain solutions. Since the switch, there hasn't been any problems.
 

Changeling1

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2005
Messages
655
Location
Southern Cal
Format
4x5 Format
Is there any advantage (or even disadvantage) in using distilled water for mixing a) developer b)stop bath c) fixer or d)wetting agent? I can always get as much as I want for free, so I thought maybe its a good idea since the water is really clean. :smile:

Developer, fixer and hypo-clearing agents should NOT be made with distilled water. They were not formulated for using such water and will not yield optimal results.

Photo-flo should be made with distilled water.
 

Monophoto

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
1,689
Location
Saratoga Spr
Format
Multi Format
Developer, fixer and hypo-clearing agents should NOT be made with distilled water. They were not formulated for using such water and will not yield optimal results.

This doesn't make any sense.

Distilled water is pure water - H2O. Tap water is pure water that has a variety of contaminants in it, but the contaminants vary from place to place. How could a chemical manufacturer possibly design a developer, fixer or hypoclear for optimum use in tap water without knowing specifically the composition of that tap water? And how could he possibly market something on a global basis when the actual composition of tap water varies so widely.

No, the notion that photo chemicals were designed for optimum use in tap water rather than distilled water fails the common sense test.
 

gainer

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2002
Messages
3,699
Some developers have been designed to tolerate most tap water. Perhaps in touting that fact, the statement was made that tap water is optimum, but it should have read "There is no need for distilled water. Optimum results will be obtained with tap water." That statement may or may not be true. I have encountered tap water that was not fit to drink because of the amount of chlorine in it. You don't always realize it. When I moved to this place I got used to the deepwell water that is cool in hottest weather, sweet to the taste and, unfortunately for carbonate developers, very hard, but that's good for the heart. When I visit my old haunts, I can hardly stand to wash my face for the chlorine in the water.

I use a lot of borax and sodium metaborate in my developers because they do not require either distilled water or EDTA.
 

tac

Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2007
Messages
245
Location
Appalachia
Format
Medium Format
Developer, fixer and hypo-clearing agents should NOT be made with distilled water. They were not formulated for using such water and will not yield optimal results.

Photo-flo should be made with distilled water.

Could you maybe provide a source or authority cite for this? Especially for developer, fix and hypo-clear?
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom