Best developer for T-Max P3200

gcoates

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2005
Messages
71
Location
Chico, CA
Format
Multi Format
I'm giving T-Max P3200 a try for the first time as I need the speed for some indoor documentary style photos of my kids. It looks like Kodak recommends either Xtol or T-Max developer for push processing this film. Has anyone tried both of these developers with this film? What are the pros and cons of each?
 

ericdan

Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2014
Messages
1,359
Location
Tokyo
Format
35mm RF
I’ve tried both. Liked xtol much better. But then I don’t like Tmax developer on any films I’ve tried it on. I shot it at 1600 and realized it’s too flat. I have some threads out with my issues. I’d shoot it at 3200 and develop in xtol according to Kodak instructions. To me it seems much sharper and finer grain than Delta3200. Still grainy but not popcorn grain like the Ilford 3200 high speed film.
 

removedacct1

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
1,875
Location
97333
Format
Large Format
Xtol works quite well. Do NOT use Rodinal with this film; it will ruin the highlight details and turn them to paste.
 

NB23

Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2009
Messages
4,307
Format
35mm
XTOL. As opposed to what I have read on the net, I found tmax and dd-x developers to give less shadow details...
Xtol is an amazing developer.

I also like tmz 3200 with ilfosol-3.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,934
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
You might want to try Microphen. It may be one of the few developers that gives a genuine half a stop extra speed which it sounds as if you need so maybe close to 2000 speed.

pentaxuser
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,544
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
I used to shoot a lot of P3200 and always used T-max developer. My low light technique with this film has was to shoot wide open at 1/30 and zone focus. Though lately I have taken to using flash in dim and dark light and not using that film anymore.

P3200 in T-max Developer


HP5 + Flash

 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,354
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Replenished XTOL is my go to developer.
 

chriscrawfordphoto

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Messages
1,887
Location
Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
Format
Medium Format
Tmax Developer is what I've always used. I haven't tried Xtol, but it is also popular with Tmax 3200. Don't use D-76, it gives awful tonality with Tmax 3200.
 

Juan Valdenebro

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Messages
1,286
Location
South America
Format
Multi Format
The only developer that makes me enjoy TMZ @ 3200 a lot, is TMax Developer... And apart from a healthier tone than Microphen, Xtol and DD-X, it gives crisp, beautiful, yet controlled grain... The first time for me was wow! And the syrup is sooooo long lasting! That developer was not designed for TMax films, but to push TMZ, some say... I never was able to make Delta3200 that good in any developer. I would use TMZ if I could buy it here! Film has to be very fresh...
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
caffenol ( any recipe ) with a splash of any stock print developer you have on hand ( dektol or ansco 130 ar3 my go-2's ). normal agitation ( 1 mins then 10sec/min ). .. about 8 mins. its like GOLD
 

ericdan

Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2014
Messages
1,359
Location
Tokyo
Format
35mm RF
gcoates said:
Thanks, everyone! Anyone have any sample images of P3200 developed in X-tol that they'd be willing to share?
Click to expand...
Here are two prints I made from P3200 developed in xtol 1:1. These were printed on Ilford fiber warmtone developed in Neutol. I guess a lot also depends on how you print the film. Hope this will give you an idea.
this is the negative inverted.
 

Adrian Bacon

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 18, 2016
Messages
2,086
Location
Petaluma, CA.
Format
Multi Format

XTOL all the way.
 

Ko.Fe.

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,209
Location
MiltON.ONtario
Format
Digital

I have used new (current) TMAX3200 this winter. Including indoors. Developed in TMAX and printed from it. Do not waste your mone. HP5+ gives better results @3200 in HC-110. I'm sure TMAX400 will do the same.
 
OP
OP

gcoates

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2005
Messages
71
Location
Chico, CA
Format
Multi Format
Ko.Fe. said:
I have used new (current) TMAX3200 this winter. Including indoors. Developed in TMAX and printed from it. Do not waste your mone. HP5+ gives better results @3200 in HC-110. I'm sure TMAX400 will do the same.
Click to expand...
I have wondered about HP5 at 3200 and developed in Xtol. I have a bunch of HP5. Might have to give that a shot too.
 
OP
OP

gcoates

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2005
Messages
71
Location
Chico, CA
Format
Multi Format
I have a follow up question too. Xtol seems to be back-ordered at most places, but the Legacy Pro EcoPro developer is available. Are they comparable?
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,873
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
gcoates said:
I have a follow up question too. Xtol seems to be back-ordered at most places, but the Legacy Pro EcoPro developer is available. Are they comparable?
Click to expand...
It probably doesn't work the same in a replenishment regime - which is one of the big advantages in my mind of XTol.
 

bluechromis

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 11, 2015
Messages
652
Format
35mm

Agulliver

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
3,550
Location
Luton, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
I have used both ID-11 and Microphen with good results....I've shot P3200 at anything from 1600 to 12,800 ASA. Very grainy at 12,800 but usable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…