ahh ok - fair enough, if you don't ask you wont know i guess
Love the look of those Cooke lenses - maybe one day...
I want to try and find out what lens(es) Victoria Hill used on her Graflex for this shoot: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5F13q2Z39M
the series can be seen here (she used a Graflex Super D and a Sinar for the series): Dead Link Removed
& here: https://fstoppers.com/bts/17-extrao...tintype-portraits-and-bts-victoria-will-67181 & here: http://camerarumors.info/tintype-po...-the-sundance-film-festival-by-victoria-will/
I would love to use the lens similar to what she used to get that rich detail and lovely DOF... Any ideas as to what she used???
What is this lens?
Hi all,
I am looking for a fast, sharp portraiture lens for my recent Graflex Super D 4x5 acquisition...
I will mostly be making 4x5 tintype close-ups of my sitters in studio (lighting) conditions. But will also be using it on location out 'in the field' for more full body work... I want to have full control over DOF - so the faster the lens the better!
A newer lens would be best, I would rather not have any 'hot' radioactive lenses around my children, regardless of the lack of trouble coming from them...
But if the best lens available is a radioactive elemented lens then so be it - i will have to be extra careful where I put it
Cheers all!
Nathan
Going to strongly dis-agree with Ed. Something I've never done. But to imitate the look that Victoria Will is getting you would have to embrace wet plate photography and yes, you will have to find a fast petzval lens somewhere. They have a unique signature of incredible sharpness in center and fast fall off to beautiful out of focus zone. Nothing about what she was doing is cheap, but neither is it impossible to accomplish. Lots of folks doing fine wet plate. I dabbled and didn't commit.
Hi all,
I am looking for a fast, sharp portraiture lens for my recent Graflex Super D 4x5 acquisition...
I will mostly be making 4x5 tintype close-ups of my sitters in studio (lighting) conditions. But will also be using it on location out 'in the field' for more full body work... I want to have full control over DOF - so the faster the lens the better!
A newer lens would be best, I would rather not have any 'hot' radioactive lenses around my children, regardless of the lack of trouble coming from them...
But if the best lens available is a radioactive elemented lens then so be it - i will have to be extra careful where I put it
Cheers all!
Do you ever travel by air? If you do and your plane flies at or about 20 to 30 thousand feet altitude, you will probably get a bigger shot of radioactivity sitting quietly in your seat on the airplane that that poor old lens would put out in (I'll bet) 1000 years clipped to the front of your Super D. Of course, I am no expert but then I probably would be surprised if anyone reading your post is. The Super D is a new enough camera for the manufacturer not to put a lens on it that was dangerous to its users. I always figure that my family and I are in far more danger riding in our family car than from radioactivity.................Regards!
That looks to be an 8" Darlot projection petzval.
Ian- the Super D has a bigger lens board than the Graphics do.
Get yourself out to some flea markets, and camera fairs. these lenses turn up every so often, I have 2 or 3 bought for around £20 ($30) or less. Like this one
Despite what it looked like when I picked it up it's actually optical in extremely good condition after a clean and evicting the spider
Remember that buying from the US you're likely to get caught for VAT etc and that can add around 30% to the final cost. They are all adaptable for LF provided they have the coverage, 8" is roughly the minimum FL you'd need. You also need to make sure it'll fit a lens board mine only just does on my pee-Anniversary Speed Graphic, it's approx 9" FL.
Ian
According to the source I have the Super D lens board is 3.75"x3.75", my pre-Anniversary Speed Graphic's lens boards are 4"x4".
Ian
Would a B&L Tessar 210/4.5 be a reasonably good stand in for the projection lens and possibly be easier to find at a reasonable price?
Be aware that lens has no slot for Waterhouse stops it's a projection lens so can only be used at full aperture, for that reason alone it's quite over-priced. In addition you only have 12" of bellows extension I think so a 13" lens is too long and may not be practical for portraits.
The aperture is the focal length divided by the diameter of the entrance pupil, so roughly f5.6
Ian
http://www.cameraeccentric.com/html/info/graflex_8.html
gives some useful information but does not tell the bellows draw of the various models.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?