Bergger Unveils Pancro400

Sonatas XII-55 (Life)

A
Sonatas XII-55 (Life)

  • 0
  • 1
  • 1K
Rain supreme

D
Rain supreme

  • 3
  • 0
  • 1K
Coffee Shop

Coffee Shop

  • 4
  • 1
  • 2K
Lots of Rope

H
Lots of Rope

  • 2
  • 0
  • 2K

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,816
Messages
2,797,068
Members
100,043
Latest member
Julian T
Recent bookmarks
0

Mick Fagan

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
4,429
Location
Melbourne Au
Format
Multi Format
Hmm, it is available in 135 format at 6.46 Euro, which equates to AUD$9.07, which is quite cheap compared to normal film prices in Australia.

I'll be in Europe in a few months, I may try and pick some up to bring home.

If they ever release this film in 135 bulk loading, say 30m rolls, I would be onto this like a rat up a drainpipe.

It is simply wonderful in 4x5".

Mick.
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
Trix and hp5 are not similar.. explain please
Thanks Peter
Tri-X and HP5 are both 400 speed, traditional (not t-grain or tabular grain) films. They produce not dissimilar results although I do like the look and overall contrast of Tri-X better. I've shot the Bergger Pancro 400 in 5x7. It was nice overall but I got frilling when I developed it in Pyrocat HD. If the problem exists in 120 as well, that would completely rule it out for me.
 

Peter Schrager

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
4,206
Location
fairfield co
Format
Large Format
Tri-X and HP5 are both 400 speed, traditional (not t-grain or tabular grain) films. They produce not dissimilar results although I do like the look and overall contrast of Tri-X better. I've shot the Bergger Pancro 400 in 5x7. It was nice overall but I got frilling when I developed it in Pyrocat HD. If the problem exists in 120 as well, that would completely rule it out for me.
I have yet to try it but will at some point...supporting kodak and ilford right now
I've used trix and hp5 but find them more dis similar than alike..if kodak ever stops making trix we're in trouble!!
 

ChuckP

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 8, 2003
Messages
722
Location
NW Chicagola
Format
Multi Format
Don't forget that Tri-X sheet film is different from roll film. 320 speed and a different curve. I find in sheet film HP5 and Tri-X are very different.
 
  • Deleted member 2924
  • Deleted

Peter Schrager

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
4,206
Location
fairfield co
Format
Large Format
Not a clone. .probably made by ilford under contract with the Bergger formula
Regardless hood to have cjoices
 

Peter Schrager

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
4,206
Location
fairfield co
Format
Large Format
Remember Bergger never made anything
they still don't but it's nice to have choices
I've only heard nice things about tge film
 

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,089
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
So they have unveiled a film? An amazing feat!! Previously, what i understood is that once you veil (fog) a film, it could not be unveiled...
 

Rudeofus

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
5,084
Location
EU
Format
Medium Format
Trix and hp5 are not similar.. explain please
They may not be exactly the same, but they occupy the same (quite crowded) product space of traditional grain ISO 400 black&white emulsions. Is it really so difficult to create a product which brings something new to the table, like a true ISO 1600 emulsion? Or is the ISO 400 market so much bigger than anything else, that there is enough room for such a multitude of products?
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
12,210
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format

Rudeofus

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
5,084
Location
EU
Format
Medium Format
Thank you! According to their data, it appears to have slightly more red sensitivity than the average B/W film.
Now that you mention it, while Tri-X and HP5+ stop at 650nm, Pancro's red sensitivity goes till 680nm. This is still not as far up in wavelength as typical bayer sensor filters, on the other side, the human eye appears to cut off at 650nm. Since Chlorophyl has a Dead Link Removed, I wonder whether this seemingly slight difference in cutoff wavelength is a lot more visible than one might think.
 

NJH

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
702
Location
Dorset
Format
Multi Format
Delta 400 also has a similar drop off up around 660 to 680.
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
12,210
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
I asked Beau Photo in Vancouver if they would carry this film when it was first released, and they said no, due to weak Canadian dollar. But that's okay. I can order it from the US.
 

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,089
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
Not a clone. .probably made by ilford under contract with the Bergger formula
Regardless hood to have cjoices

Probably the formula itself was done at Ilford laboratories by Ilford engineers; most likely Berger direct them on what result they wanted.

Still, I welcome new films.

Thank you! According to their data, it appears to have slightly more red sensitivity than the average B/W film.

What about Fomapan 400? it goes almost to 690nm according to their datasheet.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
2,408
Location
London, UK
Format
35mm
Not a clone. .probably made by ilford under contract with the Bergger formula
Regardless hood to have cjoices

Probably the formula itself was done at Ilford laboratories by Ilford engineers; most likely Berger direct them on what result they wanted.

Still, I welcome new films.



What about Fomapan 400? it goes almost to 690nm according to their datasheet.

Nope. If I'm not mistaken when Panchro 400 was first unveiled in large format it was said to be a collaboration between Filmotec, Bergger and Innoviscoat.

Funny that the datasheet recommends pre-soaking, something that no Ilford or Kentmere film needs or even recommended.
 

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,089
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
Nope. If I'm not mistaken when Panchro 400 was first unveiled in large format it was said to be a collaboration between Filmotec, Bergger and Innoviscoat.

Amazing that the #2 fast food company (behind McDonalds) would get involved with Filmotec and Inoviscoat!
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
2,408
Location
London, UK
Format
35mm
Amazing that the #2 fast food company (behind McDonalds) would get involved with Filmotec and Inoviscoat!
???
What fast food company?
You must be needing reading glasses.
Bergger has 2x "g". And it isn't "Burger King".
I made a mistake with Inoviscoat as it hasn't a double "n".

http://bergger.com/
 

Mick Fagan

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
4,429
Location
Melbourne Au
Format
Multi Format
I have almost finished my 50 sheet 4x5" box or Bergger Panchro film, I have 6 sheets left. As I never process more than 4 sheets at a time, often it is 2 sheets. I have processed probably around 15-18 lots of this film. Not once have I pre-soaked, nor am I ever likely to do this. Regardless of the reason for pre-soaking, as suggested by the data sheet, I think this is a really wonderful film.

I do wonder why when using Bergger PMK, one has to pre-soak for 5 minutes with the pre-soak 1ºC warmer than the incoming developer solution. This is a mystery to myself.

Mick.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom