Bellows length versus lens size

A Forest

A
A Forest

  • 7
  • 4
  • 162
Say it with flowers

A
Say it with flowers

  • 3
  • 1
  • 132
IMG_0701.jpeg

A
IMG_0701.jpeg

  • 3
  • 2
  • 105
The letter P.

A
The letter P.

  • 3
  • 1
  • 110

Forum statistics

Threads
186,625
Messages
2,599,341
Members
96,584
Latest member
patmu
Recent bookmarks
0

Robert

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
747
I've read the piece on the viewcamera website and it mentions that using lens with focal lengths longer then the bellows you won't be able to focus at less then infinity. At least that's my feeble understanding. Do you lose anything else? Assuming the camera doesn't fall over from the weight of the lens-)) For a camera that is going to be used in the outdoors mostly focussing on far away things does this matter? I know I should be looking at shorter focal lengths but the budget looks better with barrel lens and a lens cap shutter. They mostly seem to be close to the max bellows of the low cost cameras.
 

Jorge

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2002
Messages
4,515
Format
Large Format
If the lens is longer than the bellows, you wont be able to focus at all!
So for example if you have a 210 lens you need 21 cm of bellows extension to focus at infinity, anything less and it is like being nearsighted without glasses.....you only see blurr..
Now if you wish to focus on objects closer than infinity then you need to extend the bellows even more.
I have not read the View Camera article but Simmons is a very acomplished LF photographer so I think you misunderstood the article.

If you post what kind of camera and bellows lenght you have maybe some of the members or I can give some suggestions for inexpensive lenses.
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,927
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
As a general rule of thumb, you want at least 25% more bellows extension than the focal length of your longest conventional lens; however, you should be able to focus a lens of focal length equal to the maximum bellows extension at infinity. Telephoto designs will let you go longer, because the optical node of the lens is actually out in front of the glass. True telephoto lenses usually involve a compromise in optical quality over conventional lenses, but by requiring less bellows length, they may avoid problems of camera stability and wind vibration that come from extending the bellows to the maximum length.

If you're just starting out, I would get something closer to the normal lens for the format, so you can experiment with camera movements and use the camera for what it does best. If the bellows is at full extension, you will usually have no movements available. There are lots of good classic lenses out there in shutters, especially around the focal length for a "normal" lens for each format. What format are you shooting? If you're starting with 4x5", there are many fine lenses, usually Tessar types, in the 135-150mm range, like the Ektars, that are usually quite reasonable priced.
 
OP
OP

Robert

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
747
I think I've found a Graphic View I. Well I think it's the early model. I get a bit of a headache reading the descriptions of the differences between the I and the II. I should have measured it but I checked the www.graflex.org website and they claim 12" of bellows max. 3 1/2 min.

The article mentioned the 25% rule. Actually it stated 50% would be better.

You'd think the normal lens would be reasonable but what I've seen on Ebay lately I'm better off getting a new one -( At least if I want one with a working shutter and no problems.

So I get the impression I should stop looking at those 600ml process lens on Ebay-)
 

Jorge

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2002
Messages
4,515
Format
Large Format
I would say anything from 150 to 210 would do you fine with this camera. Yes 600 would be way beyond what you could focus with your camera. David's suggestions are very good for your camera.
 
OP
OP

Robert

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
747
Okay I guess the limits make it easier to figure out what to buy.
 
OP
OP

Robert

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
747
With the talk about the Toyo 45CF I went and relooked at the specs. The info from badger graphics claims

"Maximum bellows extension 14.04” (356.7mm)
Longest Lens with maximum bellows draw 400mm"

That doesn't make sense does it? Also how useful are extension boards? All I'd really like to use would be 300mm at the long end and 100mm at the short end.
 

Jorge

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2002
Messages
4,515
Format
Large Format
well in addition to the bellows you have the thicknes of the standars which help a little, 4 cm is not that big of a distance. But I would be very uncomfortable using a lens at the limit of the bellows draw. WHat if you dont want to focus at infinity but at a closer subject and you are lacking 1 cm. It would be kind of a bummer to loose the shot because of this..no?
 
OP
OP

Robert

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
747
So basically that 400mm number is marketing speak. A 400mm lens would turn it into a fancy fixed focus camera.
 

Jorge

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2002
Messages
4,515
Format
Large Format
</span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Robert @ Oct 17 2002, 06:46 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>So basically that 400mm number is marketing speak. A 400mm lens would turn it into a fancy fixed focus camera.</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>
You got it!
 

EUGENE

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
38
Robert, the specs. for the Toyo 45CF states that a 400 tele lens is maximum for the camera, not a 400mm standard type lens. Check with the Toyo View website The Fuji 400T has a flange focal length of about 250mm , at infinity focus. Well under the 356mm maximum bellows extension that the camera is capable of handling.
 
OP
OP

Robert

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
747
To be honest all I did was cut and paste from the Badger site. Checking the Toyo site the text does mention the telephoto but the specs still say just 400mm. Maybe they figure I'm the only one dumb enough not to know better-))
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
7,651
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
As a general rule of thumb, you want at least 25% more bellows extension than the focal length of your longest conventional lens; however, you should be able to focus a lens of focal length equal to the maximum bellows extension at infinity. Telephoto designs will let you go longer, because the optical node of the lens is actually out in front of the glass. True telephoto lenses usually involve a compromise in optical quality over conventional lenses, but by requiring less bellows length, they may avoid problems of camera stability and wind vibration that come from extending the bellows to the maximum length.

If you're just starting out, I would get something closer to the normal lens for the format, so you can experiment with camera movements and use the camera for what it does best. If the bellows is at full extension, you will usually have no movements available. There are lots of good classic lenses out there in shutters, especially around the focal length for a "normal" lens for each format. What format are you shooting? If you're starting with 4x5", there are many fine lenses, usually Tessar types, in the 135-150mm range, like the Ektars, that are usually quite reasonable priced.

Why 25%?
 

Tel

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
826
Location
New Jersey
Format
Multi Format
One of the things I like about a view camera is the ability to really stretch the bellows out and get close to the subject. It'd be a shame to lose that option.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
22,478
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format

Well and example is a 300mm lens on my Wista 45DX, maximum bellows extension is not much more than the Focal length, so focus closer than Infinity is very limited. If the bellows extension was 375mm I'd achieve much closer focussing, making the lens practical.

In practice, I use a 360mm lens on my Wista, but it's a Tele-Xenar at Infinity it's roughly comparable to my 210mm in terms of bellows extension as it's Flange focal distance of 214mm.

Cameras are usually Double or Triple extension, that's bellows extension 2 and 3 times the typical standard lens Focal Length.

Ian
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
7,651
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
Well and example is a 300mm lens on my Wista 45DX, maximum bellows extension is not much more than the Focal length, so focus closer than Infinity is very limited. If the bellows extension was 375mm I'd achieve much closer focussing, making the lens practical.

In practice, I use a 360mm lens on my Wista, but it's a Tele-Xenar at Infinity it's roughly comparable to my 210mm in terms of bellows extension as it's Flange focal distance of 214mm.

Cameras are usually Double or Triple extension, that's bellows extension 2 and 3 times the typical standard lens Focal Length.

Ian

Got it. I don't shoot close (yet). So I have not been faced with that. I do have a 300mm lens that I use on my Chamonix 45H-1 that has a bellows to 350. Would that be sufficient for close-ups? How close? I also have 75mm, 90mm, and 150mm lenses. Couldn't I use those for closeups?
 

Tel

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
826
Location
New Jersey
Format
Multi Format
The thing I like best about my ROC Long-focus Premo is the extension: a bit more than a meter. The thing I like least is the bulk!
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
22,478
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
Got it. I don't shoot close (yet). So I have not been faced with that. I do have a 300mm lens that I use on my Chamonix 45H-1 that has a bellows to 350. Would that be sufficient for close-ups? How close? I also have 75mm, 90mm, and 150mm lenses. Couldn't I use those for closeups?

If my maths is right, 350mm extension with a 300mm lens will focus to 2100mm/2.1 metres. The 150mm would be best for closeups, as the 75mm & 90mm are wide angle lenses.

Ian
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
7,651
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
If my maths is right, 350mm extension with a 300mm lens will focus to 2100mm/2.1 metres. The 150mm would be best for closeups, as the 75mm & 90mm are wide angle lenses.

Ian

Thanks, I'll have to try it. Now, I need a subject.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
22,478
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
Don't forget the extra exposure factor at closer distances.

1657981065089.png


Make a start with things close to home, this was maybe 15 feet from my darkroom door. I did try with a 240mm, then a 210mm, but found them more difficult to work with. I may go shorter as U have a 135mm Symmar S and a couple of 127mm lenses one a macro lens.

Ian
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,927
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format

Ian's responses are right on target. Aside from macro still life, you might want to make a tight portrait with a long lens, for instance, for greater working distance. More bellows gives you more options, so long as you're not concerned about minimizing the weight of the camera by limiting bellows length and the extra rail and possibly larger tripod and head needed to support a longer camera.
 

xkaes

Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2006
Messages
2,127
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
The important thing is the flange focal length of the lens, not the optical focal length.

I use a 600mm Fujinon T on my Toko 4x5 cameras that has 360mm of bellows without a problem. It's a TELEPHOTO design and needs less bellows.

If you find yourself in a situation with a long lens, and run out of bellows extension, just slap a low-powered close-up/autxiliray lens/filter (AKA #10) on the lens and you are good to go.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom