Beginner problem developing in the kitchen sink

3 Columns

A
3 Columns

  • 6
  • 7
  • 145
Couples

A
Couples

  • 4
  • 0
  • 105
Exhibition Card

A
Exhibition Card

  • 6
  • 4
  • 143

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,061
Messages
2,785,599
Members
99,792
Latest member
sepd123
Recent bookmarks
0

Agulliver

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
3,573
Location
Luton, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
OP, you are ok. Just wash everything well.

What I do: I keep separate sponges and scrubbers for food and photography [Keep them in separate places]. Before I change from one to the other I use Barkeepers Helper and scrub down both sinks with the appropriate sponges and let the sink dry.

Yes, use separate sponges and any other cleaning implements. Also don't use measuring jugs that you use for food/drink to measure out photo chemicals. You *could* do it safely but it's just a wise precaution not to. That's a sensible idea. And clean the sink after doing photographic work and before doing the dishes. Probably a good idea to clean it between dishes and film developing too....the last thing you want is small food particles or tiny amounts of dish washing liquid or whatever else you put in the sink getting in your film developing tank.

And honestly...the stuff you likely clean your kitchen floor with and maybe rinse your mop in the sink is far more dangerous to health than any standard B&W developer. Hand sanitiser too, for that matter. And yes, I use both. People have been doing this in kitchens and bathrooms for decades. A few sensible precautions and it's all perfectly fine. If you are worried about photo chemicals, please do not ever consider dying your own hair. The stuff in hair dye is orders of magnitude more damaging than standard B&W photo chemicals. And that's also designed to be used in the sink.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,310
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
The stuff in hair dye is orders of magnitude more damaging than standard B&W photo chemicals. And that's also designed to be used in the sink.

Actually, several of the ingredients in hair dyes are B&W developing agents. Phenylene-diamine derivatives (CD-3 and CD-4 are PPD variants), catechols -- seems to me I've read of people developing film in suitably alkalized hair dye...
 

Nicholas Lindan

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
4,248
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
Format
Multi Format
Actually, several of the ingredients in hair dyes are B&W developing agents.

Chloro-Resorcinol is in almost all hair dyes and is one of the putative 'magic ingredients' making up the X in Microdol-X.

I wonder if old stinky Dektol would make a good hair dye?

Many developing agents are produced by plants as fungicides. Catechol can be extracted from apples and bannanas.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,991
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Actually, several of the ingredients in hair dyes are B&W developing agents.
Funny you should say this, as I recently dyed my hair a lovely chestnut brown and I am sure it has improved my sepia toning. I wonder if some of the ingredients seep through to the brain which transmits a sort of a message to that part of the brain that is responsible for brown toning

A friend went blond and since then his highlights on his head and in his prints look overexposed. There has to be a correlation, I feel

pentaxuser
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,310
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
I’ll cast a vote for caffenol here for kitchen friendliness.

Probably as good as it'll get, but it stinks.

Second place might be Xtol (tiny level of phenidone derivative, borax found in laundry products for alkali, though sulfonates from the sulfite are one of the things I've seen warnings about). Likely Adox XT-3 would be better than Xtol due to no borax.

Beerenol? Nothing but beer and suitable alkali (washing soda, usually), probably less stinky than Caffenol (haven't tried it with beer yet).
 

Horatio

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 13, 2020
Messages
965
Location
South Carolina
Format
Multi Format
Probably as good as it'll get, but it stinks.

Second place might be Xtol (tiny level of phenidone derivative, borax found in laundry products for alkali, though sulfonates from the sulfite are one of the things I've seen warnings about). Likely Adox XT-3 would be better than Xtol due to no borax.

Beerenol? Nothing but beer and suitable alkali (washing soda, usually), probably less stinky than Caffenol (haven't tried it with beer yet).

Lager or Pilsner? Better yet, brew your own and drink the leftovers!
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,310
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
Lager or Pilsner? Better yet, brew your own and drink the leftovers!

There is a craft beer (an ale, IIRC) made specifically for this (adjuncted with high phenol content berries), but it's pretty expensive compared to plain old Rainier (which is a lager pretty similar to a pilsner).

In fact, almost any beer ought to work if Rainier does. Likely you'll get more activity with a higher body beer -- or some of the action might be due to components of the hops, so an IPA might be preferred, but again, if Rainier works, I'd expect really cheap stuff like Hamm's or Busch to do so as well. I'd probably avoid "light" beers, though -- like developing in Xtol 1+3 instead of 1+1, little if anything gained, just takes longer.
 

Horatio

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 13, 2020
Messages
965
Location
South Carolina
Format
Multi Format
There is a craft beer (an ale, IIRC) made specifically for this (adjuncted with high phenol content berries), but it's pretty expensive compared to plain old Rainier (which is a lager pretty similar to a pilsner).

In fact, almost any beer ought to work if Rainier does. Likely you'll get more activity with a higher body beer -- or some of the action might be due to components of the hops, so an IPA might be preferred, but again, if Rainier works, I'd expect really cheap stuff like Hamm's or Busch to do so as well. I'd probably avoid "light" beers, though -- like developing in Xtol 1+3 instead of 1+1, little if anything gained, just takes longer.

How about non-alcoholic beer? Any phenols there?

Edit: According to a study I found via google, ales have the highest phenolic content of all beers. Non-alcoholic beers have about 1/3rd the amount of phenols, 3.4mg/L. That doesn't sound like enough for development, but then again I'm not a chemist.
 
Last edited:

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,310
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
Looks like you'd get very slow development with near beer. Given ales have the highest content of the presumed developing agent, a homebrewed IPA (which, given the oak chips or barrel priming will also pick up a little tannin) is likely to be the strongest/fastest working developer. Still, seems like a waste of good beer compared to using brews I'd hardly drink that cost about the same as homebrew...
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,310
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
BAC1967 develops film in beer

That's where I noted the use of Rainier.

It used to be brewed in south Seattle (I could smell the brewery from the freeway when they were boiling the wort). I see no reason Hamms, Busch, or other "animal" beer shouldn't work exactly the same. Better beer might well work better (in terms of having more of whatever develops the halide) but Rainier et al. apparently work well enough I wouldn't want to use beer I actually enjoy drinking.
 

BAC1967

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
1,435
Location
Bothell, WA
Format
Medium Format
I've developed in Rainier, Pabst Blue Ribbon, Budweiser, Fosters, home brewed Porter ... I've seen little variation from beer to beer so I usually go with stuff I don't like that people leave behind at a party, what's on sale at the grocery store or whatever is cheapest. I don't usually use beer I like to drink. When I developed my recipe I used caffenol as a starting point.

Here is my recipe.
Beer (cheap Lager, like Pabst Blue Ribbon works good) - 12oz
Sodium Carbonate (Arm & Hammer Washing Soda) - 2.75 Tsp
Ascorbic Acid Powder (Vitamin C) - 1.25 Tsp
Salt (Morton's Iodized Table Salt) - 1/4 Tsp

Add the ingredients in the order listed above. Fully dissolve the Sodium Carbonate in the beer before adding the next two ingredients, this may take several minutes. I mix everything in a clear container so that I can see the undissolved ingredients settling in the bottom. I always make sure my Sodium Carbonate is anhydrous by baking it in the oven at 250F for a few hours. Store it in an air tight container. This can have the biggest affect on your development.

Develop at 20 degrees C for 20 minutes. Agitate first 30 seconds then 15 seconds every minute. I follow development with a good water rinse at 20 degrees C followed by a normal Fix then whatever rinse is recommended by your fix instructions.

Warning - Adding the Ascorbic Acid first will result in a foam explosion, always slowly add Sodium Carbonate first while mixing.

Here's some of my results: https://www.flickr.com/photos/60348236@N07/albums/72157680888508674
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,160
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
To the OP:
In case you were wondering, the preceding is what is known as "thread drift". :D
And the only thing I will say about beer and developing film in your kitchen, is that it is important not to drink too much beer before you develop film in the kitchen:whistling:.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,310
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
it is important not to drink too much beer before you develop film in the kitchen

And even more important not to drink the beer after making it into developer...
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,160
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I had a teeny tiny little taste of D-76 (1+1) when I was a little kid and I turned out just fine
Are you saying you developed without problems? :whistling:
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,397
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Or one can test the pH with this:
Screen Shot 2021-09-24 at 3.35.17 PM.png


https://www.empressgin.com/

This gin and McHenry's Butterfly Gin use botanicals from the same plant that Phenolphthalein is derived from. Pour some of this in a glass, it is dark blue. As tonic water is added it changes to purple [violet] around pH 7.0. Add more tonic water and it turns pink as the drink becomes acidic.

This is a perfect way to relax after a day developing film or making enlargement prints.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Or one can test the pH with this:
View attachment 286058

https://www.empressgin.com/

This gin and McHenry's Butterfly Gin use botanicals from the same plant that Phenolphthalein is derived from. Pour some of this in a glass, it is dark blue. As tonic water is added it changes to purple [violet] around pH 7.0. Add more tonic water and it turns pink as the drink becomes acidic.

This is a perfect way to relax after a day developing film or making enlargement prints.


That is a very interesting drink I never heard of. I do not drink Gin, but this might be a fun experience.

However:
-) Phenolphthalein is in the EU on the list of to be banned substances, it is listed as being carcinogenic

-) Phenolphthalein is a synthezised substance. I do not know of a plant that contains it.

You likely mix up Phenolphthalein with Lackmus, which indeed is of vegetabile origine and which may make such colour change in case the gin is alkaline from the start.
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
That is a very interesting drink I never heard of. I do not drink Gin, but this might be a fun experience.

However:
-) Phenolphthalein is in the EU on the list of to be banned substances, it is listed as being carcinogenic

-) Phenolphthalein is a synthezised substance. I do not know of a plant that contains it.

You likely mix up Phenolphthalein with Lackmus, which indeed is of vegetabile origine and which may make such colour change in case the gin is alkaline from the start.
many fruits / vegetables / plants have (natural) phenols in them
if you put a slice of tomato on photo paper in the sun it will do more than make a photogram, the phenols in the tomato react with the paper like a (slow) developer.
 

Agulliver

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
3,573
Location
Luton, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
I am sure that I've tasted ID-11 and Ilford fixer back in the 80s. I had no developmental problems :smile:

Though I definitely turned out unusual.
 

faberryman

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,048
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
Are there any image quality benefits to developing black and white film in coffee or beer? If not, what is the allure?
 

Nicholas Lindan

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
4,248
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
Format
Multi Format
if you put a slice of tomato on photo paper in the sun it will do more than make a photogram, the phenols in the tomato react with the paper like a (slow) developer.

Just tried it, works faster with some baking soda sprinkled on the tomato first: Tomatonol. So tomatoes have dangerous phenols in them - I suppose the responsible thing would be to place a wild hysterical call to a bio-hazmat removal team to come dispose of my tomatoes.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom