It is possible to use the printing time for one negative to print the next, but it doesn't always give the results you might want. Two similarly exposed negatives might, for example, present skin tones that are slightly different (due to movement of the subjects and other factors) so if you are trying to optimize the skin tones, the optimized print times might differ.My professor had me do a test strip for every single print to judge the correct exposure. Is this really necessary when printing in the same session? This ends up consuming a lot of time in paper. In my mind at least, it seems as though if you have the same density in your negatives (same light meter judging exposure) then your exposure times while printing should all be about the same. Do y'all do test strips for every single print you make?
You want to choose a development time for paper that ensures a good, full black and gives good contrast. For me, that time is generally in the middle of the manufacturer's suggested range. With two exceptions, I would recommend using that time and doing so repeatedly, without variation (during a session). The exceptions are that if you are choosing which time to use repeatedly, you may have good reason to either choose a time nearer the short end of the range (e.g. when you need to do a lot of prints in a short time) or a time nearer the long end of the range (e.g. when you are processing multiple prints together, with shuffle agitation, and wish to minimize the effect of slightly different development times).how precise do you have to be when developing the paper? Is it as critical as developing film? I've read that for the paper developer I will be using the dev times are 60-120 seconds. That seems like a large range.
You probably shouldn't do this. Once you have a lot more experience, you may want to try it a bit.Third question, maybe related to the second: how do you "develop by observation?" How do you know when it is done?
Luckily I still have a bunch from my classes, as well as some leftover paper.Remember to put some negative sleeves on your shopping list. You need to store negatives carefully. The easiest to use are the clear type (e.g Clearfile) because you can print a contact sheet without removing the negatives from the sleeve.
There are 4 packets of Microdol-X for film and 1 packet of Dektol for paper but the Dektol has a small puncture in the bag so i'd assume it's shot.If any of the developer is print developer, it can't hurt to try it.
With the exception of Arista Flo, don't just buy one of each if you are relying on internet purchasesAnything crucial I'm missing?
In case I get a dud?With the exception of Arista Flo, don't just buy one of each if you are relying on internet purchases
Buy two of each now, and buy new packages when you open the second package.
There is nothing more frustrating than being ready to do darkroom work and realizing that you will need to order chemicals and wait for them to arrive before you start, unless it is to be in the midst of doing darkroom work and realizing that your chemicals have reached capacity, and that you will have to stop with the work unfinished, order chemicals and wait for them to arrive before you can continue.In case I get a dud?
Luckily I still have a bunch from my classes, as well as some leftover paper.
Right now in my Freestyle cart (trying to use them more because they sponsor Photrio, B&H doesn't):
XTOL to make 5L
Eco Pro Paper developer -1qt
Eco Pro Neutral fixer -1qt
Arista Flo -4oz
Anything crucial I'm missing?
There are 4 packets of Microdol-X for film and 1 packet of Dektol for paper but the Dektol has a small puncture in the bag so i'd assume it's shot.
Keep your enlarger and work area clean. It's much easier to clean your negatives and enlarger than to spot your prints. Have good ventilation and music in the darkroom.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?