FWIW, I've got a Philips PCS130/PCS150 enlarger. The manual comes with tables with filtration values for Kodak and Ilford papers from 20 years ago. These tables are rather different from one another in the recommended values to get a given paper grade. A while ago I ran some tests with several papers (Kodak, Ilford, Agfa, Foma, and Oriental). I found that the Kodak, Agfa, and Oriental papers worked best with the Kodak table whereas the Ilford and Foma papers worked best with the Ilford table. (I was interested mainly in the "constant exposure" tables for producing constant exposure times when changing effective paper grade.) These results might not apply to other enlargers, though, particularly since the Philips has an unusual additive (red/green/blue light) color head, rather than the more common subtractive design (white light with cyan/magenta/yellow filters).
Also, if you're interested in really quantifying these things, the January/February 1997 issue of Photo Techniques magazine has an article on doing so. It describes how to determine the effective grade of your paper with a given filter set (or the filter set to use to obtain a specific effective paper grade). I haven't yet tried using this technique, though, so I don't know how well it works. It requires a step wedge negative and benefits from a reflection densitometer, neither of which I have at the moment.