Yeah, that *always* hurts. (I just bought some car parts and the seller was brilliant - took him almost 2 months to find a suitable box for one of the parts, but he stuck with it and I appreciated his efforts.)
It's not that difficult to figure out, I've sold a couple of enlargers; used the weight from the manual and added some extra to cover packaging and the extra weight. If the buyer overpays, I simply refund the difference.
Good luck!
If it was me, I'd use it as an excuse for an overseas holiday. Go over with very little luggage and come back with an enlarger and some great memories of an overseas trip!
If it was me, I'd use it as an excuse for an overseas holiday. Go over with very little luggage and come back with an enlarger and some great memories of an overseas trip!
Mick no no, in Europe and the US I am not expecting to find an 8x10 here unless by some miracle.
I do know Chris @ Blanco Negro has a 5108 but I can't recall exactly where or how he got it, but hes not parting with it that is for sure!
I am just wondering if the 5108 and 504 share the same column?
Your second question, yes they do. There is a caveat though, if you get one of their enlargers that were a special build, they may have originally been designed for the 515 head. I'm not 100% sure, which may be a slightly different chassis up at the head. But nothing insurmountable.
Blanco Negro may have gotten his from Tasmania some years ago, but that is a pure guess.
Mick.
I am just wondering if the 5108 and 504 share the same column?
They do, but the counterweight springs are different. Sufficiently so that you can't just double up the 504's counterweight spring. As an example, the 5108 dichroic head alone weighs 17kg, before you even consider the weight of the negative & lens stages.
There are also spacers that centre the head, lens etc over the baseboard that are completely different.
Like I said before, I don't think it is anything I can't manage. Are you able to elaborate a bit more on the system it uses exactly rather than repeating the odyssey folk? The manual states its uses a pulley system or is that just for adjusting the stages?
Not planning to use the baseboard at all so.
Its actually cheaper to get one direct from the China factory than go through Odyssey
It uses a pulley system to move the stages, each of which are precisely counterbalanced with the springs so that it's almost effortless to operate. It's all inside the upper column, so it matters in all 3 possible setups - bench, wall, floorstanding. The spring counterbalances are quite intimidating, get it wrong while working on them and you could hurt yourself extremely badly, potentially even lethally so. If you've never used or worked on a De Vere before, I can only strongly advise that you don't try playing with the counterbalance springs unless you can source correct spec parts & install them with the correct tools.
Having a look at the manual just says tensators which is just a constant force spring - sourcing should be easy but as you say installing may be tricky. Unloading it then setting it horizontally perhaps may take some trial and error.
Regarding the floor standing model using chains, remember that the control interfaces have to move with the baseboard as you drop it, thus different length of drive distance have to be accommodated whilst keeping the controls at a constant position. The floorstanding base has more of the big counterbalance springs in it too.
Head & neg stage at top of column and locked off for starters. You'll need a torque wrench etc at a minimum. Have you ever dismantled a counterbalanced enlarger for transport before? Same principles apply up until you open the column, but unless you have the manufacturers spec for what tools to use & how far to tighten the mounting bolts, it's potentially a risky operation.
The opticom Durst is a computer controlled enlarger I that was designed around the l1200 frame for auto control.
It is way more complex than my AC800.
The Advertiser News paper had a AC1201 version in their darkroom in the 1990’s here in Adelaide
You don’t want it .......unless you intend to do a lot of custom prints with it and are willing to spend a lot of time programming it
Johnkpap
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?