These features have many advantages and applications in photography and I'm sure others will point you in the right direction for literature on how to use them.
I think I know to to use these features (and the principle behind them); I just can't seem to get the benefit of these features. Perhaps I am missing something.
It seems as if every time I want to keep 2 objects in focus (using camera movements), the 2 objects never fall on the "lines" where asymmetric movements would keep both objects in sharp focus.
I have this camera with asymmetric tilts & swings and, curiously, I almost fail to see the magic of having this feature.:confused::confused:
Insight would be most appreciated.
I misunderstood you to mean you are working with "variable tilt axis" like Horseman.
The post by David has given me an idea: (a) use rise/fall/shift to place the point of interest on the dotted line; use the asymmetric movements; then re-position camera, or (b) measure the angle and transfer said angle to the front standard.
Don't reposition the camera after tilting, or you'll change the relationship between the film plane, lens plane, and subject plane, and you'll need to change the tilt angle again.
Use rise/fall/shift to position the point of interest on the dotted line, tilt/swing on the rear standard, transfer the movement to the front standard if desired, and then use rise/fall/tilt to restore the original composition, now with tilt applied.
It can be a nice feature for tabletop studio photography where you might need to tilt the entire camera downward and have the luxury of working on a consistent focal plane. By way of distinction, many architectural shots use the camera leveled, where yaw is not an issue. In
portrait photography, strong movements tend to be uncommon. And then in landscape photography, the intersection of planes is often too
complex to simply use some on-camera formula like this (unless you're on the Plains, if you'll excuse a pun). I've worked for years with yaw-free
Sinars, and now prefer to use the earlier non-yaw-free Sinar Norma for my monorail needs. And neither of my folding field cameras have
asymmetric tilts. It's not a feature I ever seemed to use anyway, when I did have it.
Drew is right. In the days when table top commercial photographer did for example catalog work, asymmetrical swings and tilts sped up setting up the swings and tilts. Especially during the 80's when everything had to be sharp. When the pictorialism made a bit of a comeback with the bokeh crazy, it wasn't so important. I save up my money in college for my Sinar F in the 80's and I still have and use it. Like other photographers that follow the trend, I don't particular appreciate the feature to it's fullest these days.
I only "play" at LF, but this thread has been a mine of information to me, and the pdf by Ebony that Mr. Howers linked is an absolute gem of clear exposition
Well to site just one instance, with the use of cross front you can photograph a subject off to one side, without showing what may be directly in front of it.
Having gone from a very nice Arca Swiss 8x10 to an Ebony with asymmetric movements I can honestly say it's changed my life. It is just so much faster to setup and focus without going back and forwards. The fact that you can nail the focus first time leads to much less back and forwards checking etc. It makes me sad that my 4x5 doesn't have asymmetric movements :-(
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?