*Warning* Do not read if you are easily upset.
This is a very important subject for visual artists let me start by acknowledging some obvious and universal facts (things that are ignored by much of those contributing to this thread).
1. All sex is pleasurable. (heterosexual, homosexual, monosexual, s&m) This simply is how we're designed as sexual beings. It is very mechanical, and we are not vastly different from one another. Rub Y, get X. That simple.
2. Pleasure can be destructive. Just because something is edifying in one context, in another it can harm and destroy. For instance, fire does a wonderful job of roasting asparagus to that perfect softness/crispness to make it a pure pleasure, but fire all over the kitchen, or all over the forest is a terrible producer of death and destruction. Examples: Abuse of drugs is pleasurable but it leads to self destruction. To much alchohol leads to death on the highway and destruction of your liver. Licentious living leads to sexually transmitted deseases.
3. Sexuallity serves the essential function of reproduction of the human species. This is a very good thing. Nuff said.
4. Children are dependant on a stable environment, and need protection from those who can easily harm them. Healthy and lifelong heterosexual relationships are the most complete and healthy relationship for raising children who become healthy adults. Our society wishes to deny this so that we can excuse our adidiction to sexual pleasure at the expense of the healthy reproduction of our species.
5. Men are aroused visually. Women much less so. This is were pornography comes in.
6. Pornography is addictive to many males, and will lead to the foresaking of spouse and family for self gratification. It is a well established fact that all sexaul preditors are users of pornography first. Sexual arousal leads to sexual acts, most of which are destructive of healthy marriage, and nurturing of children.
Now I certainly hope that no one here would argue with any of they truths. If they offend you, you should ask yourself why reality bites. I would also hope that you would not produce art which leads to destructive sexual behavior, but would aim for a more edifying goal. Stop being an animal, and be human.
Rev. Timothy Gordish
Father of an adopted child who was the product of fornication, neglected by her mother, abused by a boyfriend and used for child pornography. We are currently dealing the the devasting effects of her early sexualization.
*Warning* Do not read if you are easily upset.
This is a very important subject for visual artists let me start by acknowledging some obvious and universal facts (things that are ignored by much of those contributing to this thread).
1. All sex is pleasurable. (heterosexual, homosexual, monosexual, s&m) This simply is how we're designed as sexual beings. It is very mechanical, and we are not vastly different from one another. Rub Y, get X. That simple.
2. Pleasure can be destructive. Just because something is edifying in one context, in another it can harm and destroy. For instance, fire does a wonderful job of roasting asparagus to that perfect softness/crispness to make it a pure pleasure, but fire all over the kitchen, or all over the forest is a terrible producer of death and destruction. Examples: Abuse of drugs is pleasurable but it leads to self destruction. To much alchohol leads to death on the highway and destruction of your liver. Licentious living leads to sexually transmitted deseases.
3. Sexuallity serves the essential function of reproduction of the human species. This is a very good thing. Nuff said.
4. Children are dependant on a stable environment, and need protection from those who can easily harm them. Healthy and lifelong heterosexual relationships are the most complete and healthy relationship for raising children who become healthy adults. Our society wishes to deny this so that we can excuse our adidiction to sexual pleasure at the expense of the healthy reproduction of our species.
5. Men are aroused visually. Women much less so. This is were pornography comes in.
6. Pornography is addictive to many males, and will lead to the foresaking of spouse and family for self gratification. It is a well established fact that all sexaul preditors are users of pornography first. Sexual arousal leads to sexual acts, most of which are destructive of healthy marriage, and nurturing of children.
Now I certainly hope that no one here would argue with any of they truths. If they offend you, you should ask yourself why reality bites. I would also hope that you would not produce art which leads to destructive sexual behavior, but would aim for a more edifying goal. Stop being an animal, and be human.
Rev. Timothy Gordish
Father of an adopted child who was the product of fornication, neglected by her mother, abused by a boyfriend and used for child pornography. We are currently dealing the the devasting effects of her early sexualization.
Straw men and teleological smoke & mirrors, all. Saying 'lust is good' does not preclude the value of love. 'Nobility' implies a pre-ordained heirarchy, among species and usually among humans specifically. I have little evidence that one set of humans is a priori intrinsically superior to another, or that humans are inherently superior to beetles -- considerable history hints that they are not. I enjoy being human and all that comes with being human -- not being some flawed copy of a 'more perfect' boogieman.My question is simply, which is more noble and human? To love or to lust? Which should we cultivate? Is there no pleasure in self giving love? Is that pleasure greater than the pleasures of lustful stimuli?me said:And yes we can enjoy a host of lustful stimuli without having to actually create children, provide long-term care for their other parent, and all the other associations one can cite as 'love.'
4. Children are dependant on a stable environment, and need protection from those who can easily harm them. Healthy and lifelong heterosexual relationships are the most complete and healthy relationship for raising children who become healthy adults. Our society wishes to deny this so that we can excuse our adidiction to sexual pleasure at the expense of the healthy reproduction of our species.
5. Men are aroused visually. Women much less so. This is were pornography comes in.
6. Pornography is addictive to many males, and will lead to the foresaking of spouse and family for self gratification. It is a well established fact that all sexaul preditors are users of pornography first. Sexual arousal leads to sexual acts, most of which are destructive of healthy marriage, and nurturing of children.
Now I certainly hope that no one here would argue with any of they truths. If they offend you, you should ask yourself why reality bites. I would also hope that you would not produce art which leads to destructive sexual behavior, but would aim for a more edifying goal. Stop being an animal, and be human.
Father of an adopted child who was the product of fornication, neglected by her mother, abused by a boyfriend and used for child pornography. We are currently dealing the the devasting effects of her early sexualization.
"I would also like to see where you got your "fact" that a heterosexual coupling is the superior way to raise a child."
I am speaking in idealistic terms. If you were to compare apples to apples, and not rotten bannas (maybe I should stick to vegetibles) then heterosexual coupling is superior because they model a relationship that is reproductive, vice simply erotic. Homosexual sex does not produce life, if life is superior, then heterosexual coupling is superior.
A homosexual couple as parents is superior to no parent at all, and this is often the case in real life, and not the ideal, but we should always strive for the ideal.
"Beware of universal truths. They are rarely universal, and even rarer, true."
Is this a univeral truth?
The verdict is not yet out on that one, and there is a practical constraint on their value to the effect that because homosexual couples, less so ones with children, are not well tolerated in many societies, children reared in them can indeed potentially experience more travails than those reared in heterosexual couples. However, this is not conclusive to an essentialist argument about homosexual couples, which would go along the lines that such a milieu is inherently detrimental.
I did not denigrate homosexual couples or their adopted children's rearing. You jumped to this conclusion yourself. See my reply concerning what I think about homosexual vs. heterosexual couples with children.
Baloney. Women's sexual arousing during the viewing of pornographical material follows a pattern similar to men. Tastes, however, are notoriously different. While men can be satisfied with scenario-less hump-and-pump clips, the current market for women pornography seems to indicate that other aspects come into play. Standard formulas would be: romantic settings, better light, man's sensibility to woman's need, etc. But woman still jerk off looking at picture of people having sex, you know.
I did not say that women are not arroused by pornographic material, only that men are to a greater proportion. Just check out the local magazine rack for this one.
Premises: yes. Conclusions: nay. You are having a severe case of post hoc, ergo propter hoc. As you are a reverend, I will spare you the need to translate from the Latin. That sexual predators watch pornography, and that it has a deletrious effect on their condition is a fact. That pornography causes their condition is at best a hypothesis, not a logically following conclusion.
I said that sexual arousal brings on sexual acts. Read it again.
Oh my! what did I just do? I dared discuss TRUTH? I have CRITICIZED? I have even pushed the envelope as to wonder whether ASSUMPTIONS are justified? You mean that I have wrongfully used REASON against TRUTH? That I have perverted the sacred truth that you luckily hold aloft? How dare I?
Nope, you have pushed no envelope here. Thanks for responding, you don't seem to agree with what I am saying. Why is it so necessary to prove my points wrong if they are so unreasonable? By the way, what exactly are you trying to say that is contrary to my points?
If that last bit is true, you have my sympathy and my compassion for this child and for your efforts to help her. But I maintain my arguments, and return you to your claim "If they offend you, you should ask yourself why reality bites. "
Somehow, I think we've seen your model before.
A puritanical society of repressed brainwashed people, women as slaves, child abuse through indoctrination, and of course run by "reverends" like yourself.
We've seen it here, it's flourishing in the Middle East and it always breaks down. Why? Because it removes free will and the celebration of human expression.
One should always fear religion and its power brokers more that one ever need fear sex in its many forms.
Michael
So far it seems my only offense to discussion is that I signed it "Rev." Sorry folks, that's my title. Sorry you hate me before you even know me.
My apologies for my title.
*Warning* Do not read if you are easily upset.
This is a very important subject for visual artists let me start by acknowledging some obvious and universal facts (things that are ignored by much of those contributing to this thread).
1. All sex is pleasurable. (heterosexual, homosexual, monosexual, s&m)
This simply is how we're designed as sexual beings. It is very mechanical, and we are not vastly different from one another.
Rub Y, get X. That simple.
2. Pleasure can be destructive.
Just because something is edifying in one context, in another it can harm and destroy.
For instance, fire does a wonderful job of roasting asparagus to that perfect softness/crispness to make it a pure pleasure,
but fire all over the kitchen, or all over the forest is a terrible producer of death and destruction.
Examples: Abuse of drugs is pleasurable but it leads to self destruction. To much alchohol leads to death on the highway and destruction of your liver.
Licentious living leads to sexually transmitted deseases.
3. Sexuallity serves the essential function of reproduction of the human species. This is a very good thing. Nuff said.
4. Children are dependant on a stable environment, and need protection from those who can easily harm them.
Healthy and lifelong heterosexual relationships are the most complete and healthy relationship for raising children who become healthy adults.
Our society wishes to deny this so that we can excuse our adidiction to sexual pleasure
at the expense of the healthy reproduction of our species.
5. Men are aroused visually. Women much less so. This is were pornography comes in.
6. Pornography is addictive to many males, and will lead to the foresaking of spouse and family for self gratification.
It is a well established fact that all sexaul preditors are users of pornography first.
Sexual arousal leads to sexual acts, most of which are destructive of healthy marriage, and nurturing of children.
Now I certainly hope that no one here would argue with any of they truths.
If they offend you, you should ask yourself why reality bites.
I would also hope that you would not produce art which leads to destructive sexual behavior,
but would aim for a more edifying goal.
Stop being an animal, and be human.
[signed] Rev. Timothy Gordish . .
Father of an adopted child who was the product of fornication, neglected by her mother, abused by a boyfriend and used for child pornography. We are currently dealing the the devasting effects of her early sexualization.
Somehow, I think we've seen your model before....One should always fear religion and its power brokers more that one ever need fear sex in its many forms.
Ya, my spelling sucks...(not bites) but that has always my downfall in the literary arts. I guess that is why I enjoy photography.
So... what is the point? That I am a hypocrite simply because I have ideals. That I burned Joan of Arc? That I am sexually repressed? (I guess I suffer a lesser of two evils) That I be irked? That you can't address my points directly? I guess I just don't get it because I didn't study hard, and strive for academic excellence, and ended up in the church?
What exactly is it that I said that evokes your response? What is the essence of your disagreement? Spoken like a high school student in chemistry class..."I don't get it!"
BTW I checked the spelling on this one so hopefully it is better.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?