Melvin J Bramley
Allowing Ads
This site is to a large extent (or even, virtually entirely) about people expressing themselves. I don't know about you guys, but seeing AI generate output doesn't remove my desire to speak my mind or create images. So no, it's not going to make this site irrelevant.Will AI make real photography websites such as this irrelevant ?
Thats not the primary strength of a LLM.You can ask it where it was educated . For example Chatgpt is not up to the standard that some imagine:
ChatGPT as a darkroom tool
Has anybody else found value in using ChatGPT as a darkrrom tool? I am a novice photographer that picked up film photography during the early days of the COVID pandemic. I've never had formal photography training and have pieced together whatever knowledge I've gained largely through trial and...www.photrio.com
This site is to a large extent (or even, virtually entirely) about people expressing themselves. I don't know about you guys, but seeing AI generate output doesn't remove my desire to speak my mind or create images. So no, it's not going to make this site irrelevant.
We'd both fail on both ends.Especially you and me we should run Turing Tests on each other
Don’t know how relevant it is but I saw recently some forums made especially for AI bots to chat.
Their complaints were hilarious e.g. “Look what this stupid human asked me to do again”
AI might just be able to address the requests for help with photographic materials and equipment that this forum covers, thus rendering it a large part unneeded. However, the give and take of opinions and sourcing gear will still need human presence. Imagery has little to do with the general content of the forum IMO, except to analyze mistakes, complications and faults stemming from developing and printing. AI could probably take care of that, too. AI generated imagery might take over the gallery, but I never look there, so it wouldn't affect anything there. As a matter of fact even if the entire gallery were AI imagery, who cares? As far as I can tell, there is little to be gained by posting AI imagery in the gallery.Will AI make real photography websites such as this irrelevant ?
The internet is flooded with manipulated images that go way above the average film or digital photographer.
Will we have cameras that have an AI mode?
The future does not look good.
AI might just be able to address the requests for help with photographic materials and equipment that this forum covers, thus rendering it a large part unneeded. However, the give and take of opinions and sourcing gear will still need human presence. Imagery has little to do with the general content of the forum IMO, except to analyze mistakes, complications and faults stemming from developing and printing. AI could probably take care of that, too. AI generated imagery might take over the gallery, but I never look there, so it wouldn't affect anything there. As a matter of fact even if the entire gallery were AI imagery, who cares? As far as I can tell, there is little to be gained by posting AI imagery in the gallery.
| Feature | Kodak T-Max 100 | Kodak Tri-X 400 |
| Curve Shape | Linear / Straight Line: Maintains a nearly straight line through the midtones and highlights. | S-Curve: Features more pronounced compression in both the shadows (toe) and highlights (shoulder). |
| Shadow Detail (Toe) | Very short toe; detail is recorded almost immediately upon exposure. | Longer, more gradual toe; results in "crunchier" or more dramatic shadows. |
| Highlight Detail | Tends to compress highlights more gradually at higher densities (D-max). | Classic "shoulder" that compresses highlights, giving them a softer, traditional look. |
| Contrast Control | More responsive to small changes in development time (Zone System). | More forgiving of slight development errors; contrast is more "baked-in." |
Artificial intelligence and real stupidity are two sides of the same coin pretty much.Will AI make real photography websites such as this irrelevant ?
The internet is flooded with manipulated images that go way above the average film or digital photographer.
Will we have cameras that have an AI mode?
The future does not look good.
Sometimes. Most people never get to see them though.Any bots here?
Also, we use AI to improve this site.I do know that AI does train on messages from board like this, so this site improves AI.
Yeah, remember those days when you could go on a computer and type in something www. etc. and then you would get text and images and whatnot? Man...it's weird how briefly that lasted. The bubble burst and we all went back to newspapers, mail-order catalogs and video rentals.Like the Dot Com bubble.
AI could be very helpful in providing accurate technical information rather than aesthetic opinions. Here's a sample of a question I asked Google Gemini AI:
Provide comparison curve charts betwen tmax 100 film and Tri-x film.
While a single direct comparison chart from the manufacturer is rarely available in a single document, the characteristic (H&D) curves of Kodak T-Max 100 and Kodak Tri-X 400 highlight significant differences in their tonal responses.
Key Curve Comparisons
Feature Kodak T-Max 100 Kodak Tri-X 400 Curve Shape Linear / Straight Line: Maintains a nearly straight line through the midtones and highlights. S-Curve: Features more pronounced compression in both the shadows (toe) and highlights (shoulder). Shadow Detail (Toe) Very short toe; detail is recorded almost immediately upon exposure. Longer, more gradual toe; results in "crunchier" or more dramatic shadows. Highlight Detail Tends to compress highlights more gradually at higher densities (D-max). Classic "shoulder" that compresses highlights, giving them a softer, traditional look. Contrast Control More responsive to small changes in development time (Zone System). More forgiving of slight development errors; contrast is more "baked-in." Detailed Characteristics
For specific technical charts, you can refer to the official T-Max Technical Data Sheet and the Tri-X Technical Data Sheet for their respective H&D curves plotted against various developers like D-76 and Xtol.
- Linearity: T-Max 100 is known for its "perfect" linear scale, which makes it feel more like a modern digital sensor in its response to light. This results in smoother tonal transitions across the entire range.
- Highlight Separation: Tri-X provides better separation in the highlights due to its traditional cubic-grain structure, which many photographers prefer for a "vintage" aesthetic.
- Grain Structure: T-Max 100 uses tabular (T-GRAIN) technology, which allows for significantly finer grain and higher resolution (200 lines/mm) compared to the traditional cubic grain of Tri-X.
Some of that is inaccurate though, so whether or not it is very helpful sort of depends (not that it really matters much from a practical perspective but it could matter).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?