• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Arista.EDU Ultra 100 in HC110 dilution B

Forum statistics

Threads
202,127
Messages
2,835,487
Members
101,125
Latest member
man5091
Recent bookmarks
0

Nicholas Lindan

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
4,316
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
Format
Multi Format
Although the data sheet for Arista EDU Ultra 100 4x5/8x10 sheet film says 'NR' for HC110, it seems it can be done. Developing time is short and a bit close to the induction time so results may vary. ASA 100 is optimistic for this film and 25 or 50 may be more appropriate depending on how you like your deep shadow detail.

Test results One sheet of film, cut in two
Left side: HC110 B, 4 min, 20C, tray, continuous agitation
Right side: D76 1:1, 9 min, 20C, tray, continuous agitation
Arista100HC110.jpg


Not much of a subject matter, but it was sure to be a negative I would never regret cutting in two.

HC110 time was found by WAG.
 

Jadedoto

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 31, 2006
Messages
148
Location
Vallejo, CA, USA
Format
Medium Format
Just goes to show the magic of BW... so long as developer touches the silver for some reasonable amount of time, you'll get an image.

Those times are rather short... I wonder if pushing the film and then pulling development would make it easier to be more consistent with longer times? If it's that large of a sheet, I wouldn't think the increase in grain would matter that much, would it?
 

ntenny

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
2,525
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Format
Multi Format
Not much of a subject matter, but it was sure to be a negative I would never regret cutting in two.

I actually kind of like it.

Does the agitation regime affect the induction time, or is induction time more of a fundamental constant of the film? What I'm thinking with this question is that continuous agitation might prevent 4 minutes from being a "stupidly short" development time as it is with the intermittent-agitation regime that's usual for rollfilm.

-NT
 

aaronmichael

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 29, 2010
Messages
242
Location
Long Beach,
Format
Large Format
Thanks for the post. I recently started shooting this film in 4x5 (ISO 100). I developed them in HC-110 dilution H for 8 minutes and my negatives were coming out pretty thin. I thought that I was either doing something wrong with the developer or the film was actually rated at a lower speed. After some more research and testing, it looks like ISO 100 definitely is generous...with my box at least. Glad to know that someone else thinks the same thing. I'll shoot it a stop or two under 100 from now on.

As for your image, I find it to be a very subtle difference and it's hard to tell from the photo but I think I do like it in HC-110 better. Maybe I'll try it in D76 one of these days just to see how it comes out.
 

DWThomas

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
4,623
Location
SE Pennsylvania
Format
Multi Format
Coming up on Worldwide Pinhole day I shot some of this film in 4x5 and used HC110 Dilution E (1+47) at the D-76 times (6 to 7 minutes) and was pretty happy with the outcome. Since I use HC110 as a one shot, I try to avoid the higher concentrations anyway.
 

rjbuzzclick

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 30, 2010
Messages
379
Location
Minneapolis
Format
Multi Format
I shoot 4x5 Arista.EDU 100 and develop in HC-110 dil. H in a Beseler or Unicolor drum with motor fairly regularly. The MDC gives a time of 10:00, but I shorten that by around 10%. I've had good results exposing at both ASA 50 and 100.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom