Argus 40 (Forty) Camera

A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 0
  • 0
  • 83
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 1
  • 1
  • 74
img746.jpg

img746.jpg

  • 4
  • 0
  • 74
No Hall

No Hall

  • 1
  • 2
  • 73
Brentwood Kebab!

A
Brentwood Kebab!

  • 1
  • 1
  • 126

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,793
Messages
2,780,917
Members
99,705
Latest member
Hey_You
Recent bookmarks
0

PJay

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2019
Messages
9
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Format
35mm
i just picked up one of these at a local antique shop and loaded this up with 120 film. I was wondering if any of you have any experience shooting with this. Also would like to ask what kind of quirks you notice while shooting and if you have any tips for using it, that would be awesome. thank you in advanced.
 

Dennis-B

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
484
Location
Southeast Michigan
Format
35mm
The Argus 40 was meant for 620 film, not 120. The spool diameters are a bit different. It may, or may not feed properly. There are a number of links on how to convert for 120 use.
 
OP
OP

PJay

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2019
Messages
9
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Format
35mm
The Argus 40 was meant for 620 film, not 120. The spool diameters are a bit different. It may, or may not feed properly. There are a number of links on how to convert for 120 use.

I've done the conversions to fit the 120 for the camera already. DO you have one of these cameras? I'd love to know your experiences with it in accordance to thew above questions originally posted. Thank you :smile:
 

Dennis-B

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
484
Location
Southeast Michigan
Format
35mm
I've done the conversions to fit the 120 for the camera already. DO you have one of these cameras? I'd love to know your experiences with it in accordance to thew above questions originally posted. Thank you :smile:

Never owned one myself, but used my aunt's a number of times when I first started "serious" photography. I liked the large negs, but as I remember, enlargements were so-so, because I judged them against "real" portraits done by professionals. The camera was handy, but in those days B&W pan films had a lot of latitude, and it's the first camera I used to employ the "sunny f/16" rule.

My only concern now, would be the accuracy of the shutter, and the clarity of the taking lens.
 

spark

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
254
Location
SF Bay area,
Format
35mm
The Bakelite body Argus cameras can take a 120 reel in the source side if it’s a flat ended reel. Kodak and Ilford work, Fuji doesn’t. You still need a 620 spool for the take up side
 

spark

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
254
Location
SF Bay area,
Format
35mm
I should have clarified. The Argus 40 and the later Argus 75 series used the same body, made of “Bakelite”. This was the first synthetic plastic, invented in 1909 or so and it became a very common material for cheaper cameras. Look at 1940’s Brownies or 1980’s Lubitels

An Ilford or Kodak 120 roll fits snugly but acceptably in the supply side of my Dad’s old Argus “Super 75”, which is like your 40 except that it has a cheaper lens and shutter. You still need a 620 take up spool.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

PJay

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2019
Messages
9
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Format
35mm
I've tried placing Ilford 120 film spool in the supply side of my Forty but it was way too tight. I ended up putting the edges and filing down the sides of the spool to get ti to fit.
 

spark

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
254
Location
SF Bay area,
Format
35mm
The super 75 had a fixed 1/50 shutter and three apertures, it did pretty well with a roll of Pan-F. Have fun
 

John Wiegerink

Subscriber
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
3,641
Location
Lake Station, MI
Format
Multi Format
I have the Argoflex 40 model and while being bare-bones, it does rather well.. It has the 75mm f4.5 focusing coated Vaskar lens. Several years ago I was testing two Rolleiflex cameras out that I had just purchased and tuned up. I had never shot a roll of film in the Argoflex and thought it a good time to run it through the same test as the Rollei's. I respooled a roll of 120 onto are spare 620 spool since a 120 spool was just to tight to feed right. To make a short story shorter the Argoflex did extremely well. It's contrast at wide open f4.5 was less than the f3.5 Planar and f2.8 Xenotar I was testing as was the sharpness/resolution, but stopping down to f8-11 was a whole different ballgame. I would have no problem using the camera if I had to, but since I have many better cameras I don't have to. So, it's on my shelf with it's original box, flash with box and instruction manual. One thing these cameras have is very bright viewfinders and there is no problem viewing in any light condition. Of course scale focusing might be a problem for some folks. I have no problem scale focusing and can estimate distance very well. All said, the Argus Argoflex cameras don't have all the bells and whistles of a Rollei, Yashica 124G, but you might be surprised as at the result you can get if you take your time and use your head. Try it!
JohnW
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom