Are people dumping their Leica collections in the trash?

$12.66

A
$12.66

  • 6
  • 3
  • 122
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 1
  • 0
  • 151
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 2
  • 2
  • 143
img746.jpg

img746.jpg

  • 6
  • 0
  • 111
No Hall

No Hall

  • 1
  • 8
  • 167

Forum statistics

Threads
198,804
Messages
2,781,083
Members
99,708
Latest member
sdharris
Recent bookmarks
1

steven_e007

Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2007
Messages
826
Location
Shropshire,
Format
Multi Format
The danger of wives throwing stuff in the trash is bigger than you might think!
Not in a fit of pre-divorce pique, neccesarily, but very often widows (and I suppose widowers too) often have no interest in, and no understanding of, their deceased loved ones hobbies.

Many years ago our next door neighbour died in his late 80s. He was a collector of 'memorabilia'. Or, to his wife's viewpoint, 'rubbish'. After he died she had a nice big bonfire. We don't think there was ill feeling at work, she simply had no idea that anyone would be interested in this old rubbish.

Old 'rubbish'... well, my Dad was leaning over the fence trying to see what she was burning, (whilst my Mother was dragging him back shouting 'leave her to greive in her own way!" Roughly translated this means "I don't want any of that garbage in my house!")

Point is, he had a large collection of photographs. My Dad did sneak in and casually ask if he could have a look at one album, which she willingly gave him. It was a collection of views of sailing ships in Whitby harber. Apparently the old man was raised there.... before the first World war, which seemed to be the vintage of the album. The prints were all stamped "F.M.S." :-o

I don't even want to think about what went onto the bonfire....

A similar well known story concerned a guy whose hobby was photographing the canals in the Midlands of Britain. He went out most weekends from the 1930s until his death photographing this changing industrial landscape. Historians who new his work realised his negative collection must be a treasure trove of history. When they discovered he had died they made approaches to his widow tentaively enquiring about plans for this archive - a few weeks after she had dumped the whole lot in the skip. The local council even organised a search of the local landfill, but nothing was ever found...

And cameras too, they usually turn up at antique centres after the 'house clearers' have been in. An aquaintaince of mine 'in the trade' tells me that they usually collect at least one camera from each house, usually something worthless, but occassionally something priceless. They pay a flat fee to clear a house either way...

I'm sure there is a moral here, somewhere.
 

jsfyfe

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2007
Messages
77
Location
Northern Vir
Format
Medium Format
Here's another data point. A lot of unsold pieces at Tamarkin's spring auction, and those that sold (e.g. Rolleiflex) went for what I would call a 'low to average' price. Tamarkin usually has pretty good quality stuff. I guess they either didn't get what they wanted or no one wanted them. (Although someone paid big bucks ($55K) for the Leica Gun Outfit).

http://www.tamarkin.com/auction/
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,364
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
The danger of wives throwing stuff in the trash is bigger than you might think!

...
A similar well known story concerned a guy whose hobby was photographing the canals in the Midlands of Britain. He went out most weekends from the 1930s until his death photographing this changing industrial landscape. Historians who new his work realised his negative collection must be a treasure trove of history. When they discovered he had died they made approaches to his widow tentaively enquiring about plans for this archive - a few weeks after she had dumped the whole lot in the skip. The local council even organised a search of the local landfill, but nothing was ever found...

And cameras too, they usually turn up at antique centres after the 'house clearers' have been in. An aquaintaince of mine 'in the trade' tells me that they usually collect at least one camera from each house, usually something worthless, but occassionally something priceless. They pay a flat fee to clear a house either way...

I'm sure there is a moral here, somewhere.

Two in fact:
1) Don't die
2) Take it with you

Steve
 

sjperry

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2005
Messages
79
Format
Medium Format
The collectible camera field is indeed interesting. Leicas have always been a prime item, with prices far higher than other equivalent cameras. The reason simply is there are more collectors intersted in the make, and relatively low production. Most of their value is as collectors items - though many are used as well. On the other hand, Hasselblads from the 500c on have been used mainly by professionals, and with the increasing use of digital, their prices have declined considerably. Rolleflexes have not suffered much decline - in fact I think their prices may be increasing! Most cameras were made in such quantities that they have negligible collector value. The prices of those cameras have always been low, and have dropped even further. I collect some cameras such as old Rolleis, and use each of them as well. I think I concur with the thought that there is increasing use of MF and LF cameras. That might have some effect on certain Leicas and other 35mm's.
 

keithwms

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
6,220
Location
Charlottesvi
Format
Multi Format
Hmm I'd sure like for someone to dump an M7 in my general direction! Okay an M6. CLE? Pretty please?

I don't see these RFs as shelf gear, they are extremely robust & reliable tools, right back to the first Ms.

Seems to me that even if I had an M8 I would still find lots of routine use for my film RFs.
 

Terence

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2005
Messages
1,407
Location
NYC
Format
Multi Format
I'd say there's an increasing use of MF and LF by hobbyists. Unfortunately, the professionals were the ones who really made the market viable. The output of LF from Canham, etc is probably much smaller than the big guys (Toyo, Sinar, etc) even 10 years ago. And the current producers of MF cameras are an ever smaller group now that Bronica, Pentax and (I think) Fuji have bowed out. I'm hoping that there's enough demand to keep Hasselblad, Rollei and Mamiya film-based options afloat for at least a few more years.

Don't get me wrong, it's allowed me to graduate from a Rolleicord to a Hasselblad, so it has its positives. But I'm sticking with non-electronic models to increase my chances of longevity of equipment availability.
 

steven_e007

Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2007
Messages
826
Location
Shropshire,
Format
Multi Format
Two in fact:
1) Don't die
2) Take it with you

Steve

:D

I was thinking maybe.... don't rely on your wife or kids to value your Leica collection or FMS albums as highly as you do (or at all :rolleyes: ).

Maybe get the plans for your collection in your will....?

Steve
 

copake_ham

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2006
Messages
4,091
Location
NYC or Copak
Format
35mm
Two in fact:
1) Don't die
2) Take it with you

Steve


:D

I was thinking maybe.... don't rely on your wife or kids to value your Leica collection or FMS albums as highly as you do (or at all :rolleyes: ).

Maybe get the plans for your collection in your will....?

Steve

This is similar to a "problem" a lot of us ham radio ops occassionally discuss.

For many of us "old timers", although now long gone, the ham radio "equivalent" of Leica was Collins Radio. Ham radio collectors can list all the gear by model names over time just like Leica enthusiasts.

There are many anecdotes about the widow who, having long resented her late husband's hobby, simply tossed this "priceless" gear in the trash can right after the interment!

Oh, and there are also anecdotes of "helpful hams", usually from the local club the dear departed was a member of, calling on the grieving widow offering to get rid of this gear for a few dollars! :wink:

You camera collectors may want to look around for some geezers - espescially if you're in a club! :surprised:
 

Peter Black

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 19, 2005
Messages
1,012
Location
Scotland, UK
Format
Multi Format
Just every now and again I get a Leica twitch and start watching prices in the dealer listings and on the auction site. This is generally cured by putting a film in my Kiev 4A and going out with my Weston to experience the vibe, but probably not the full effect! I wouldn't say that I'm seeing a major drop in prices here in the UK, and I've been leafing through some old photo mags I've been throwing out and I'd say some of the prices have even gone up in the past couple of years for a decent M6 classic.

On the auction site I've seen some strange pricing and some shrewd bidding, particularly on an M6 TTL where the guy said a dealer valued it at £850. His stated logic was that he could sell through the dealer at 20% commission or sell on the site at £699 with a BIN price of £850, so hopefully he would get more than the £699. The sole bidder put in 3 bids which (at £20 increments) meant that any other bidder would have to go a minimum of £759 and possibly more, but without any kind of guarantee/warranty on the camera. No-one else bid and the sole bidder got a bargain at £699. I also watched an R6.2 go from £460 (with 2 minutes to go) up to £875 which would get a good dealer copy with a warranty, yet this one was from mainland Europe with high postage and the possibility of 17.5% VAT on top!
 

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,466
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
Not truly silly for the collector's realm, but we're all agreed that the collector's isn't exactly sane.
In collectable books, sometimes the dustjacket is worth as much as the book.
 

Leica_girl58

Member
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
19
Location
Leominster,
Format
35mm
This is the story of my Leica Collection.
My Uncle is a true Leica collector, which means that I don't even think he ever put more than a couple rolls of film in any of his cameras. He just enjoys holding them in his hands and pressing the shutter button.
He shared with me all their was to know about the history of leica and what it means to own and use one. It didn't take me long to learn and appreciate the quality of leica. My uncle actually gave me his m2 as a first gift and with the second gift of his r3 to follow a short time later.
I enjoyed using the m2 but mainly use the r3 for all of my photography. I have put that camera thru many years of use and it has stayed loyal to me with right-on exposure. I have had a few mishaps with the shutter button and advance lever being ripped off during one of my adventures. It just now returned to me after spending a few months at dags camera repair in wisconsin for a cla.
My Uncle is slowly letting go of his lecia collection and decided to give me his m4-2 this past year. I haven't had a chance to try her out yet, but do enjoy holding it in my hands and pressing the shutter button. :smile:
Just a couple months ago, my Uncle also decided that I shouldn't have to wait for his will to go in effect before I received his r6 and all the goodies that go with it. I was quite excited to receive that leica as I have used it a few times with beautiful results. I went to pick up the r6 and he told me that I might as well take his m3 while I was at it. I haven't used this one yet either but plan to try it out with the m4-2.
I believe that he is now left with a couple of older lecias which I wasn't really attracted to anyhow. I am happy with my new collection and will hopefully get to know the m's a little better this summer.
I plan on using all of my cameras so that I keep them in good shape, but I also love to hold them and feel that "oh so smooth" film advancer and quiet click! :smile:
darlene
 

gr82bart

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2003
Messages
5,591
Location
Los Angeles and Toronto
Format
Multi Format
Darlene,

We should all have uncles like yours! You are a blessed person!

My Grandfather's Leicas went to my uncle who promptly discarded it, to my father's horror. My dad's Leica is up for grabs between me and my brother - thank goodness photography's not a hobby of his! I already have my Mom's Leica.

Regards, Art.
 

Mark Layne

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
967
Location
Nova Scotia
Format
Medium Format
Most of my camera collection came from a fellow who ran a camera store and was inclined to squirrell away things. He then married a woman who threw his german wine collection down the sink and threw out most of his cameras, eventually complaining to the fire marshall that the place was too cluttered. Unfortunately they also found his gun collection and only criminals are allowed to have guns in Canada. He then had a stroke.
Mark
 

dfoo

Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2008
Messages
268
Format
Medium Format
^ heresy! She should have, at least, thrown the german wine collection down her throat!
 

WarEaglemtn

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2004
Messages
461
Format
Multi Format
Now would not be the time to get rid of any M mount lenses with the rumor mill going on Canon coming out with a full frame EOS 1R (rangefinder) set for manual M series lenses only. Auto or manual and using Digic III processing, newest generation full frame sensor and manual rangefinder focus with confirmation... it could extend the life of many Leica or Voigtlander M mount lens collections. Not a film camera but sure would be a powerful incentive to keep your Leica film cameras so you had the best of both worlds.
 

patrickjames

Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Messages
742
Format
Multi Format
Now would not be the time to get rid of any M mount lenses with the rumor mill going on Canon coming out with a full frame EOS 1R (rangefinder) set for manual M series lenses only. Auto or manual and using Digic III processing, newest generation full frame sensor and manual rangefinder focus with confirmation... it could extend the life of many Leica or Voigtlander M mount lens collections. Not a film camera but sure would be a powerful incentive to keep your Leica film cameras so you had the best of both worlds.

Where did you hear that?
 

railwayman3

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2008
Messages
2,816
Format
35mm
IMHO the difficulty with cameras as an investment (with the exception of the mega-rare stuff) is really the same as most collectables....there is no regular market-place (like a stock-market for shares), everything is down to supply and demand, and changes in people's interests and fashions.
Although, if there is a reliable priced catalogue (as with postage stamps and coins), this can encourage interest in a particular area.
Having seen how cheaply the commoner cameras from the 1900's-1930 go at photo fairs, it occurs to me that one factor (apart from the obvious problem of obsolete film sizes) could be that a particular collector's interest might be for the period which he can remember or relate to, e.g. I started picture-taking in the late 70's, and I have little interest in equipment further back than the 1960's, when I can just remember the stuff which my Dad used.
 

df cardwell

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
3,357
Location
Dearborn,Mic
Format
Multi Format
There was a time folks invested in stock looking for a dividend and stable investment.
Today, they buy stock for a quick profit, like betting on horse races. Things change.

Looking at cameras as an investment, however is silly.
I bought a pretty good investment outfit in 1969,
a black Leica M4 with a 50/2 lens. Paid $750.
Corrected for cost of living (2007) that's $4400.
Which is to say, the camera is
still a camera, but the dollar I used to pay for it is now worth 17 cents.

The real value of the camera has been that I paid for college with it,
and it has supported me many years since.
The added value has been, in other words, ME.
That its 'value' has kept pace with inflation is largely irrelevant.


A new MP with lens, a year ago, cost just about what the C-O-E projection predicted it would.
So, Leicas DON'T accrue value, they retain value. Putting that $750 in a nice, secure bond would have been a MUCH better INVESTMENT. They only are tools, and the money you make comes not from possessing them, but my USING THEM !

On the other hand, a new 105 Nikkor cost about $125 in 1969.
Same lens, on Ebay, mint-in-a-box, is about the same. Or LESS.
Corrected for Inflation, that lens should cost $750, which is so.
The lens has lost most of its value as an investment,
but the value as a piece of photo gear has increased, at least to me.
Film is better, and I'm a lot better shooter than I was 39 years ago.

Buying a nice, expensive camera for pleasure is the same proposition.
Buy a nice, new, expensive Leica, shoot it for 39 years,
unload it. Nice, cheap hobby, good clean fun.

But collecting cameras is a just mug's game.
 

Uncle Bill

Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
1,395
Location
Oakville and
Format
Multi Format
Darlene,

You have a very generous uncle, I inherited my Leica M3 and eye level prism Nikon F (641) from my dad just before he passed on from cancer three years ago. My brother got a Topcon, Nikkormat Ftn and a Leica IIIG. My dad's one regret was he did not give them to us sooner. All the cameras get used the way they are meant to.

Bill
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom