Are Fuji Provia 120 spools smaller than Ilford HP5 ones?

Watering time

A
Watering time

  • 0
  • 0
  • 12
Cyan

D
Cyan

  • 1
  • 0
  • 12
Sunset & Wine

D
Sunset & Wine

  • 3
  • 0
  • 18
Adam Smith

A
Adam Smith

  • 1
  • 0
  • 69
Adam Smith

A
Adam Smith

  • 4
  • 0
  • 89

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,098
Messages
2,786,128
Members
99,809
Latest member
OttoMaass
Recent bookmarks
0

ChrisGalway

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 24, 2022
Messages
410
Location
Ireland
Format
Medium Format
I struggled to fit Ilford HP5 120 film into my DaYi film back ... and cursed the DaYi back (there are many reasons to curse a DaYi back!).

But I've now loaded the DaYi back with Fuji Provia 100f 120, and they fit perfectly, loading is easy.

My measurements indicate that my Ilford 120 spools have an external height that is around 0.14mm larger than the Fuji ones, hence the tight fit for the Ilford spools. Has anyone else noticed this? Or am I imagining things ... it's only a sample of 2 of each film spool.
 

AnselMortensen

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2020
Messages
2,496
Location
SFBayArea
Format
Traditional
It appears that the Fuji spools are slightly rounded (convex) at the outer edges, while other spools are flat.
 
OP
OP

ChrisGalway

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 24, 2022
Messages
410
Location
Ireland
Format
Medium Format
Yes, the combination of the Fuji Provia reels being very slightly less high, and very slightly rounded, makes a huge difference in the DaYi back!
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,547
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
It’s been a while since I’ve interrogated the film spool standard, but absolute measurement values might be important to consider rather than just the difference. All of the spool dimensions had a minimum and maximum value. The difference you computed is smaller than I remember, but my memory might be hazy. The measurements of the film holder might be what’s out of spec also.
 

AnselMortensen

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2020
Messages
2,496
Location
SFBayArea
Format
Traditional
Having slightly rounded edges makes the maximum diagonal measurement slightly smaller...which makes it easier to 'bayonet' the spool into the camera/back.
Clever.
Also, Fuji came up with a hole in the leader of their 120 film that catches on a prong in the center of their spool's loading slot. No annoying slippage when loading.
Also clever.
 
OP
OP

ChrisGalway

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 24, 2022
Messages
410
Location
Ireland
Format
Medium Format
And I like their black dot sequence leading to the frame number ... a large black dot (you can't miss it) following by 3 black dots of decreasing size, designed so you concentrate and look out for the numeral. Fuji put thought into the details of their products.
 

Slixtiesix

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 31, 2006
Messages
1,408
Format
Medium Format
My experience as well that Fuji 120 spools are easier to load in most cameras because of the "sleeker" design, compared to most other manufacturers.
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
14,025
Format
8x10 Format
Fuji Easy-Load spools are slightly rounded on the ends, making them easier to insert. It's too bad that all spools aren't made that way. Now Fuji Acros II, which is made in England instead, has the same conventional spools as Ilford and Kodak films.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom